Needless to say perceptual/kinesthetic experience art is everywhere again. Arguably, the three artists mostly responsible for this renewed interest are Robert Irwin, James Turrell and Olafur Elliason. A lot of interest in Portland for this kind of work as well.
Jerry
Saltz describes a Portland-esque art experiment... 'cept we've been developing
this way for years. Here it isn't a single site, it's the way our scene operates and
it is different if the art develops this way instead of an episodic situation.
Things are tough for art galleries and The New York Times chronicles the shift
to a
market that favors collectors vs speculators. When I was in New York last
March I noticed a vulnerability I've not noticed before... frankly this might
be a good thing because though the art market boomed during the past 7 years
it has produced little art of consequence. At least Portland galleries have
lower rents and aren't used to selling unknown artists for 10K+.
Edward Winkleman discussed the NYT's gallery woes article from his own very
personal angle.
The Tribune has a nice piece on MoCC's
Call and Response... with a lot of smart stuff quoted from curator Namita
Wiggers. But, define reknowned? ...in my book only Chris
Johanson qualifies, though many more international artists are getting set
to move here... (being international isn't enough either, we have lots of internationally
active artists in Portland now, for me it's the probability of a solo show at
MoMA some day that is the litmus test).
Jessica
Stockholder's park installation shows just how good she is. Local artists
like Jenene
Nagy, Stephanie Robison and Jacqueline
Ehlis are all quite influenced by her... and she's actually from the Northwest...
so will we ever get a solo show of hers here in Portland?
If there is a critic in Portland who is more interested in sexualized identity
politics than... (more)
At PORT we've all known for a while that our pal MK Guth was stepping down as PNCA's MFA chair, especially after being in the last Whitney Biennial. What wasn't clear is if they could get some similar star power to replace her, yet they needed it. Now with noted curator (SF's Yerba Buena) and artist Arnold Kemp, it looks like they have the star hire they needed. In fact, Portland's professional portfolio of leaders just continues to improve... here's PNCA's release:
"We are so pleased to appoint Arnold Kemp, with his great strengths in so many spheres of the art world," said Greg Ware, Provost, PNCA. "We feel confident that he will bring diversity, richness and depth of experience not only to our MFA students, but to Portland's art community... (more)
Over the years, the Archer Gallery has become one of the more daring college
spaces in the metro area and I was saddened last year when Marjorie Hirsch made
it clear it would be her last year as director. Her efforts like Ellen
George's impressive solo show and the recent Considered
Space put the Archer Gallery on the map... but there's always more room for a risk-taking and professional curatorial program as Portland's institutions continue to catch up to all the very worldly artists who have moved here in the past decade or so. I also wondered, what would the Archer be like without her?
We are about to find out, since Clark College has announced that the new Director for the Archer Gallery is
Blake Shell.... (more)
John Wesley confuses the hell out of people but I really like his work, the
Times
has a piece on him here today. Of course Donald Judd liked his work too
and upon a recent viewing of his installation
at Chinati I could see why. He was also an excellent addition to Robert
Storr's 2004
Site Santa Fe Biennial on the grotesque, fitting right in with R. Crumb,
Carroll Dunham, Robert Gober and Tony Oursler. Wesley's work certainly does
create a kind of "Soul Dizzyness" Storr described in the biennial's
text.
So what is it about Wesley that keeps him an insider's favorite? For me its
his clean clear fugal forms of composition, his blurring between the private
things we all notice but don't speak about and bland things we always seem to
discuss... (more)
RACC, CAN and does emerge in 2010 with a strong budget
Even in these tough times Portland is beginning to make arts funding a priority by
announcing yesterday that the:
Portland City Council approved the FY10 city budget with a $4,325,300 allocation
to the Regional Arts and Culture Council (RACC), including whole funding for
most RACC programs. The budget, which was approved 5-0, also includes additional
one-time funds for the Creative Advocacy Network to deliver a regional, sustainable
dedicated funding solution for arts and culture funding as well as The Right
Brain Initiative to support integrated arts education programs.
Yes PORT
can be hard on RACC for not being challenging enough sometimes (for public
art and individual project grants), still this is a major victory for them in these
difficult times. They have been making steady progress in the past few years and this only consolidates their gains. Congratulations are in order as this allows them
to continue the momentum.
Is the Hybrid Bridge dead? It better not be! Portland Architecture reports there is a rising possibility of an all out war
between Portland's design community and Trimet, which many suspect has rigged
the Hybrid Bridge over the Willamette to fail
while negotiating Trimet's rather design-blind decision making criteria.
Seriously, something is very wrong in Portland's civic process if good design
isn't given serious attention for its bridges like the new Willamette
Span or the Columbia
River Crossing. If Portland is to continue being the international design
hub it has increasingly become, we must walk the walk. Besides, in "bridge city"
we need especially well-designed bridges not just functional eyesores. Seriously,
this simply cannot stand and the design/arts community needs to pool all of
their networks and fight for good civic design. (aka the Rosales designed Hybrid
Bridge and a design
competition for the CRC). The process is broken, fix it! Tell Trimet what you think here.
Francis Bacon's "Study after Velazquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X" 1953, Des Moines Art Center, Iowa
Mary Henry, "Full Moon Over the Mendocino Headlands," 1971
Sadly, PORT has just learned that painter Mary Henry passed away yesterday. Read Arcy's interview with her on PORT. Then go see an installation of her works from various periods @ PDX across the hall.
Brandeis' The
Future of The Rose Committee is not inspiring confidence and drawing comparison's
to Stalin's committees even. How can the Rose be a functioning museum without
a director and curators? How can this committee be anything more than a desensitizing
tool if it doesn't have suggested members from outgoing Rose staff? To answer
one question... would it be a permanent black list... yes almost certainly!
This will be remembered as one of the most foul museum raids by caretakers in
recent memory.
David Adjaye will designing the new
National Museum of African American History and Culture. Surprise surprise,
it's based
on sculpture... and though the design is decent it's hardly mind blowing...
maybe that is the point, the building will have to stand on its programming
ultimately.
Portland Architecture has joined PORT in calling for a design competition for
the Columbia River Crossing and gives
the Governor a lesson in the difference between aesthetics and design to
boot. Design
Competition Now... right now the process has been driven by very
unimaginative, extremely orthodox... even rigid thinking and we won't get an
actionable design until some serious architectural talent is brought to bear.
This job is beyond the capabilities of all but the best architects working in
conjunction with innovative engineers. Right now it is being driven by standard
engineers and nominal architectural talent. A design competition will bring
some real solutions quickly for quite a bit less than millions that have been
wasted already in this false design process.
Longtime Portland arts patron Melvin Mark has given the Portland
Art Museum an early Gauguin,Vue dun jardin, Rouen (Garden View,
Rouen) in memory of his recently departed wife, Mary. It's an important
impressionist acquisition for Oregon's art going public, which has had limited
access to any Gauguin works. The painting was exhibited in 2003 at the Portland
to Paris exhibition (which also sported another later Brittany era Gauguin, also from a private
collection). The work went on display Sunday on the 1st floor of the Jubitz
Center for Contemporary art (Mark Building).
Gauguin is one of my favorite artists and interestingly ambitious before he
so famously found his way to the south pacific and his most iconic works. In 1884
(same year as PAM's
Van Gogh) he was busy trying to ingratiate himself amongst the impressionists (having collected their works etc),
then the most vanguard artists at the time (until Gauguin, Van Gogh and Cezanne
took that title as the top post impressionists). In 1883 Gauguin
had decided to become a professional painter, before that having been a stockbroker with
a real talent for art...so considering this is a pretty good painting from that
early makes it a bit of a catch. You can see how Gauguin makes even a winter scene look exotic. Thanks to the Marks for making it possible
to finally see a Gauguin on a regular basis at the Portland Art Museum (completing the trinity of early works by the major post-impressionists).
The Guardian considers why "schlocky",
"teutonic" self portraitist Martin Kippenberger goes over well with
women? It is an odd question. Honestly, my take on him has nothing to do
with gender; he's a good artist but not terribly original... he's a kind of
permissive force for lesser artists following in his wake. After seeing his retrospective at MoMA recently I feel even more strongly now that his importance (or self-imposed unimportance) seems to rest on his follower's somewhat dubious merit more than his own.
My second response to the meeting last night about the integration of the Museum of Contemporary Craft and Pacific Northwest College Craft (PNCA) was that art institutions should consider becoming more specific rather than more general in regards to their programming. It might seem counter-intuitive but there is a term used in retailing called "death in the middle". The term suggests that the way that most people shop for things today is very selective and generally at either the top end or the low end with rarely anything in the middle. The result is that one might see a $500 hand bag being carried by a person wearing a $5 shirt. Either someone really wants something and is willing to invest in it or they need it but are not really emotionally attached to it and therefore it should be as cheap as possible. In other words this is a good market for stores that sells things at the upper end that might be expensive and at the very low end where things are inexpensive, but for the stores in the middle, like department stores that try to be everything to everybody, it is a very difficult time. Just to be clear, these analogies are about the relative price of goods, and maybe the emotional attachments to some products, not indicator of friendliness or approachability. These stores are equally accessible to anyone. It is a good example that we all live in extremes, and that a general audience does not even really exist.
More...
Basically, the
proposed design is laughably bad (I've called it a casino in the past) and
proves the design process is broken and backwards... overall requiring a fix.
Why? because the architects involved are clearly out of their league, designing
an inelegant and patronizing monstrosity that resembles
the car Homer Simpson designed (The Homer).... essentially decoupling aesthetic
form from function. Major architects know better, hell even minor ones do... (more)
Tyler Green has been making links to tweets about people's favorite small paintings, here, here and here.
Though I don't have a favorite small painting per se, I do have a favorite small scale painter, Paul Klee. He's ultra influential these days with his lyrical pre-minimalist and fairytale theatrics, which relate to artists like Chris Johanson, Mark Grotjahn and Tomma Abts etc. Even architects like Steven Holl with his perforations, Rem Koolhaas's irrationally rationalized materials, Zaha Hadid's fugal curves and Herzog & de Meuron etc. They all owe him a great deal.
detail Clarification, Paul Klee (1932) Berggruen Collection at the Metropolitan Museum
Right now I currently have a crush on Klee's...(more)
Jerry Saltz
takes on the Younger Than Jesus show at the New
Museum and particularly liked Ryan Trecartin, whom weve seen a couple of
times at Igloo and TBA. He also explains why postmodern theorists look just as hypocritical as modernist idealogues.
Frankly, in many ways it looks like the same old thing weve seen for years and something tells me no institutionally
sanctioned "ennial" will define the next really big thing, we need a cleaner break.
The WWeek has the scoop, another sad day... Mark Woolley Gallery to close after 15 years in business. (Yes close is the right word this time, galleries often reinvent themselves but that isn't the case here.)
Pedestrian view from proposed "Hybrid" bridge, courtesy Rosales + Partners/Schlaich Bergermann and Partner LP
Brian Libby at Portland
Architecture has a great follow up on the hybrid
bridge unveiling. I couldn't make it but this more detailed design is much
better and Rosales is correct in that this hybrid cablestay/suspension design
is more transparent experience for users (see above) than the wave
design. My overall concern centers around how this future Portland icon
is getting less aesthetic attention things like former Mayor
Potter's beard or Randy Leonard's bass-akwards fixation
on a neon sign. Aesthetics matter and it seems like design is trying to
be snuck in through the back door of the discussion. This is the same problem
with the
I-5 bridge, which needs a top tier architect to pull off with any kind of
hope for success.
Barry Johnson over at the Oregonian, is also discussing Willamette bridge appropriateness
with some
good thoughts. Still, his focus on height is a bit of a red herring, it's
about a design that stands up to context rather than pandering to it. A more
tailored cable stay design could be even more elegant and appropriate than the
wave or hybrid design and declare that pedestrians/bikes and mass transit are
the most celebrated modes of locomotion in the city. In my mind this bridge
was considered an engineering and budget driven project above all else. The
aesthetics are being added at the end... a kind of hail mary attempt by the
architect to save the process from itself . That strategy is appropriate for
the architect but frankly it's bad for a "city planning"... ironically
what the bridge will come to symbolize. All things considered this "hybrid"
design should be Trimet's first choice (let's see).
All that that said this Willamette span issue clears the path for stronger
discussion of the I-5 bridge, which is currently a blind man's elephant
in dire need of an architectural competition to gain clarity. Also, the Oregonian
still requires a real architecture critic to take the lead in this discussion,
healthy civics require major and experienced critical framing. Art criticism
is more of an insiders game and PORT is just offering an aesthetic assessment
on a larger issue... our focus makes us more limited in major civic discussions.
Important yes, but we are just voices from the vis art community.
Portland Architecture has weighed
in on the Hybrid
Bridge model for the Willamette we gave you a peek at last weekend. It seems
like the consensus is the Trimet process hasn't taken design seriously enough,
even though that bridge over the Willamette is likely to become a major symbol
for the city. I can say PORT has gotten image requests for the seemingly out
of the running wave design and none for the other options.
If you want some cultural blood sport, Tyler Green's play
by play over deacessioning between Christopher Knight and Donn Zaretsky.
My feelings about this are that museum deacessioning should only occur if it
if the work is unrelated or secondary to the Museum's primary focus and or the
museum already has significant holdings of that artist rendering the work a
second class citizen. Deacessioning should be rare and done to support the museum's
mission... which is not the case with The
Rose, which is just a money grab.... pure and simple.
advance look at "Hybrid Bridge" model courtesy Rosales + Partners/Schlaich Bergermann and Partner LP
On April 7th at City Hall, architect Miguel
Rosales will unveil his latest bridge design, the first new span over the
Willamette in over 35 years. There will be a scale model unveiling at 6:00 and
a lecture by the architect at 7:00.
Image of the New St, Andrews bridge, an uninspired design but interesting eco-concrete (seen in bad sculpture) has potential
The New York Times has a fascinating article on green minded, pollution
scrubbing cement being used on the St. Andrews Bridge in Minneapolis. Yes
it's the replacement for the one that collapsed...but might it have an application
for our Columbia River Crossing on I-5? Mayor Adams has made a promise of A Better Bridge and his political future rests on delivering it. The St. Andrews project only uses the
cement on sculptures but a Portland bridge design could possibly incorporate it more
fully?
Right now the two mayors are the leading voices
on the design issues and frankly that's just wrong. What the politicians need
is an architect whom they can torment into being on time and on budget while
the architect can create designs that do more than simply speak to one issue
or group. A design competition gives people a visual, till then the discussion
is about lanes, dollars, concrete, wind turbines, bridge heights, where people live and other red herrings
that only see part of the picture. A good design has to address all of those
things and much more, a politician can duck or steamroller issues but a bridge
embodies them and I think the two mayors should avoid their current situation. Let the
designs embody the discussion so the politicians can politic.
Tyler Green indicates that the Hirschhorn has undertaken a series of rolling
gallery closures because of a lack
of security gaurds.
Jerry Saltz discusses who
is looking a bit dated or artificially enhanced as the less buoyant art
market casts their recent work in a more sober light.
Correction: Ok never trust the Oregonian (I should know better) Pulliam
Deffenbaugh Gallery is not closing just adjusting its current form. Basically they are leasing out some space during slower months to PDX comtemporary, next door. I've been out of town but have known about the restructing for a few weeks.
What should be noted is that Pulliam
Deffenbaugh is an
essential core gallery and founding PADA member, but of all the main Portland
galleries, I've been most concerned about them. For the past year the gallery
has been doing mostly group shows (some stellar but red dot sales have been noticeable
slower than many other PADA galleries). It's been a long time since they had
a blockbuster solo show sales-wise too. *Disclosure I showed in one of the better selling group
exhibitions last year.
For more background, a few weeks ago MaryAnn Deffenbaugh announced she would
be leaving the daily operations of the gallery to work in development for OCAC.
Like a lot of Portland galleries, a large portion of their sales in recent years
have came from outside the city (now likely effected by the economy) and yes
some key local collectors have been hit hard in the financial crisis.
*Update Rod Pulliam and MaryAnn Deffenbaugh have yet to figure out what the new business arrangement will be... so basically this whole story broken by the Oregonian's doom patrol seems a tad premature.
Today is the 95th anniversary of the passing of Mark Rothko's father Jacob Rothkowitz on May 27, 1914. Rothko was 11 at the time and had only been in Portland 7 months before his father passed. The house that they lived in at the time was in 834 Front Street in Southwest Portland.
Rothko spent "his youth in front of the endless space of the landscape of Oregon lying covered by the wintry snows, in front of the monumental emptiness that is nothingness and and at the same time part of it 'all'".
Well, I'm back from New York and now catching up on all the better coffee and
significantly less polluted and overall greener environs of Portland.
But New York does have great architecture and museums. I'll have lots of interviews,
reviews and pictures for you later but below is a di-opical summary of my trip:
Yale professor of art history Alexander Nemerov is speaking and leading two workshops on the practice of art history at Reed College this week, all free and open to the public. On Monday, he'll lead a workshop based on his essay Seeing Ghosts: The Turn of the Screw and Art History, from Michael Ann Holly and Marquand Smith, eds. What is Research in the Visual Arts: Obsession, Archive, Encounter (2008). On Tuesday he'll present the lecture Helen Keller: Making Contact, asking "What is the relation of Helen Keller to the visual arts in America? Which artists from her time perceived the world in the way she did? What would their work look like if they did share her views, and why would this matter to us now?" And finally, on Wednesday he'll present another workshop, this one guided by his essay Fragments of the Home Front, from of Icons of Grief: Val Lewton's Home Front Pictures.
Monday workshop • 4:45pm • March 9 • Vollum 110
Tuesday lecture • 7pm • March 10 • Vollum lecture hall
Wednesday workshop • 4:45pm • March 11 • Library 41 Reed College • 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
(More: Kathleen Dean Moore at PNCA, Book signing for MoCC at Powell's, J. Morgan Puett for PMMNLS.)
Barry Johnson discusses Portland's
Coraline economy. One correction... Portland's is the same as the Warhol
economy, only Portland has less cocaine and better coffee than New York version (ie more supportive
than inherently status driven). Essentially, Portland is analogous in the global creative
economy... there is no one center but there are popular centers. During the last few recessions Portland has typically gained a lot
of new talent fleeing San Francisco, the Midwest and Seattle. PDX is also appealing to those
New Yorkers who want to concentrate more on the work than the rat race. You
can definitely network here but it's even better if you already have a network. Also, with
creative efforts following the New York or LA style "quick buck" style of project development doesn't always lead one to something lasting
and new... as we hope Laika will be. Lastly, Coraline economy doesnt work as a term... because they are hardly the only game in town, Portland's creative economy is actually more centered around small businesses, but Laika is a welcome change. Ziba, W+K, Nike, Addidas etc. are at least on par with Liaka if not moreso so lets not act like this is a new thing with only one major player.
Save the Oregon Cultural Trust from political raiders
Oregon Cultural Trust license plate, a program that has raised 1.3 million of the 1.8 in jeopardy
Notice, if you gave funds to the Oregon Cultural Trust that money is in danger
of being reappropriated for things other than culture, RACC
has the info here. What's even mindbogglingly worse the 1.8 million dollar
war chest the trust has already built up over the years is in danger of being
"recaptured." This would effectively kill the program's credibility
with donors for all time by breaking their trust.
This is the same sort of short sightedness that constantly puts cultural funding
at risk, but it's far worse because it decimates a successful program that is trying
to pull Oregon out of the bottom 5 for funding of the arts. Time to dig in,
sharpen your teeth and definitely click
here and let the politicians know what you think.
The New York Times reports on how some very
successful artists are using their art as collateral for loans in these
troubling times. Ok it's another newspaper schadenfreude story but it
reminds me why museums should act differently than artists do towards their
own work. It's the artist's right to gamble with their work, a
museum like The Rose isn't an asset to be liquidated. It is a museum holding
work for the public in trust.
New PNCA and MoCC integration details and analysis
Here's a follow up on the PNCA/MoCC
merger. In the past week I've spoken with both Tom Manley, President of the Pacific
Northwest College of Art and Kathy Abraham Chairman of the Museum of Contemporary
Craft's Board... so PORT has some important details for you now. I apologize for
this having taken me so long but I've got some major projects of my own at the
moment.
PNCA President, optimist and soon to be craft/design Museum President Tom Manley
Despite all I've heard, I'm still just as cautious as before... though I feel PNCA
is less in danger of jumping the shark and damaging itself. The school also develops an opportunity to launch its curatorial studies program much faster. That's important since I consider PNCA's
fate to be nearly analogous to Portland's goals as a serious art city.
Some of the new information:
Museum retains separate 501.c3 status and governing board
PNCA undertakes fundraising campaign and slightly alters 5 year plan to address museum's financial situation and lack of endowment.
Julie Bernard 1st recipient of PADA service to art award
Julie Bernard at her home surrounded by art by Cliffird Gleason (the large red painting) and others
The Portland Art Dealers
Association has announced its inaugural recipient of its Award for Service
to the Visual Arts, Julie Bernard.
Julie has been a fixture in the arts community supporting various arts organizations
and with her radio program Art Focus on KBOO
radio, which she hosted for a staggering 25 years, (it continues on with other hosts). Frankly,
I can't even remember how many times Ive been on it but the half hour show was
always a blast, focusing on local and national art figures alike. She has a subtle
wry wit and knew how to push peoples buttons. Bernard stepped down in 2008 and
it is wonderful that PADA is acknowledging her contributions.
Once again Tyler Green has some great analysis, this time on how the so called
victory
of a 50 million dollar arts stimulus inclusion... isn't one. The US is going
to need a new cultural plan to help us gain a new competitive edge in a world
economy where new ideas will determine who is on top. We can't beat China for
workforce or manufacturing but we can innovate. That takes supple minds, a majority
of which need culture to develop.
In Britain there is a slack
space movement. This has been happening in Portland for at least a decade
but the city could encourage it more.
Zach
Feuer is downsizing his gallery stable. Frankly Tal R was one of his best
artists (and very influential on all of the others), so this might be a good
thing for him to step into a bigger spotlight.
As ever, Edward Winkleman does a great job discussing the ways
gallerists are digging in to hang on. It isn't solid doom but nobody should
be underestimating the current situation. The active gallerists will create their own luck.
First off, Tyler Green's two
part interview with Rose Museum board chair Jonathan Lee is a
must read for anyone on a non-profit board. Christopher Knight's historical
addendum to Tyler's posts also brings the situation into greater focus.
It is an incredibly cautionary tale and if this museum is as they say "monetized"
it could set off a flashflood of short sighted anti-cultural profiteering. Long
standing institutions keep things in trust for the public and its the public
that loses when museums are destroyed for convenience. Leadership means looking
at the heuristics of the situation, not simply some cause an effect and if Brandeis
does move forward I suspect the lawsuits from those who donated to the Rose
will make them wish they hadn't.
Second, frequent PORT reader and our favorite writer over at the Mercury Matt
Davis has a report on the I-5 Bridge. It's good that Sam is taking his measure
of this thing and not moving too quickly. Still one major issue remains, the
project will need a major architect. An engineer simply cant juggle the competing
desires, politics and functions of a project like this and PORT
was one of the first to really make this case a long long time ago... pre scandal Sam heard
it too. Hopefully our beleaguered mayor can show some leadership on this
very important issue and bring more intelligent discussion, but something tells
me he needs an architect to take that role over from him. Here's a start: a
major bridge design competition will allow architects to help the public understand
the bridge in ways this project hasn't manifested yet. A bridge is functional
philosophy and the architect takes on the role of whipping boy (freeing politicians to do other things like torment the architect the hired).
Last but not least PORT is still thinking about the MoCC/PNCA merger and PNCA
has even thanked us for forwarding a more intelligent discussion on the subject
(see O we aren't slagging, we know what we are talking about and we were criticizing
the plan to make it better, now if that only worked everywhere else). I'm simply cautious about this situation and combining
a museum with an art school is tricky business, it can be done right but I don't
want PNCA to inadvertently hurt itself and Portland in turn.
OK so let's now look at how the University
of Wisconsin, University
of Washington and Univeristy
of California Berkeley all got their top notch university museums and collections too. These university museums somewhat define the schools they exist within, and it would be doubly true for an art school. Depending on the choices made, PNCA could really enhance or screw itself up... but without a separate endowment and serious autonomy for the museum it is definitely even more difficult to get it right.
Oh and its isn't merely fear that has tongues wagging about the planned PNCA/MoCC
merger as
Barry Johnson at the O claims, it's very real "institutional culture"
head scratcher. PORT
pointed out some very real best practices issues over separation of institutions,
autonomy and the differences between Museums and Universities... all now
highlighted further by the Brandeis' decision. At least the O is now raising some
questions, but to date PORT is the only place that has really looked at the
organizational delicacy of the situation and like any merger the devil is in
the details. C'mon, if Christopher Knight worked at the O he'd be all over this
and it's part of the reason Portland institutions have problems... our arts
coverage of institutional intricacies is weak (mostly it is just some reporting and
little analysis... even when there is research, it isn't contextualized or given simple cautionary case study comparisons... cough, Brandeis, cough).
Tyler Green has a superb and timely
interview with the Rose Art Museum's director, Michael Rush. It's a must
read for those following Brandeis' reprehensible decision to liquidate the Rose's
collection and dissolution of the museum. What becomes clear from the interview
is that this decision has nothing to do with the Rose's own financial standing
and everything to do with Brandeis' situation. The Rose even has its own healthy
endowment. Of course this is extremely relevant to Portland as PNCA
and The Museum of Contemporary Craft are pursuing a merger, for which I
urge extreme caution (Arcy's outright against it).... and this is partly why.
Look, even established gallery programs like Reed's Cooley and Lewis and Clark's
Hoffman gallery face ambivalence from important sections of their university
so visual arts programming is always a tricky balance, even without a formalized collection.
By now everyone has heard that Brandeis
University is planning to sell off its art collection. (I've had tons of
emails about this since last night and Tyler
is definitely on it). In short, this is reprehensible... just like the idea
of selling off the University
of Iowa's super important Guggenheim Mural by Jackson Pollock was. It also
underscores my concerns about a PNCA/MoCC merger. Institutions are defined by
their priorities and a University has to be very stable to consider having a
formalized collection under its care. Also, I believe that is where Obama's
stimulus package needs to think beyond financial institutions. Museums and Universities
are just as much the job creating entities that the automakers and lending institutions
are, in fact they will likely outlive them.
The AP
is reporting that Sam Adams, our newly elected mayor is staying put amid
some sex scandal I have barely any interest in other than I like living in a
US city where sex scandals are kinda passé. Good for him and good for
Portland. No, Adams isn't popular with all of PORT's staff or sponsors for the lies and a perception that he can be a bit "phoney" but I
think this is a good development for Portland because there is work to do. Adams got elected in part because
of his commitment to the arts as key to Portland's identity. Though his savvy in such things as artist live/work space and arts organizations is sometimes questionable, at least he is interested
and any earlier pre-mayoral mistakes are educational opportunities.
Here's how we see it, PORT just doesn't care about sex scandals. We do care
about art, design and aesthetics and we will evaluate him on those matters alone.
Who knows, maybe a slightly humbler Adams will be a more effective mayor. Clearly
he's going to have to regain confidence from a lot of people and some head scratching pet projects
like the convention hotel are probably dead for now. Also, what does the mayor think
about a 70
year old Portland art institution merging with a 100 year old one? LA's
mayor definitely wasn't for MOCA merging with LACMA a few months ago.
Also, note to the New York Times. The map you ran on Saturday is incorrect,
that dot is near San Francisco, not Portland. Please make note of the correct
dot in blue below.
PNCA's Goodman building, one of 2008's two real estate acquisitions
Isn't 2009 dynamic? maybe too dynamic. Still, Portland really can't let one
of its major institutions, the Museum of Contemporary Craft, fail and PNCA still
isn't quite whole yet after splitting from the Portland Art Museum in 1994
(disclosure PNCA is a PORT sponsor and I had a solo show there last April). Now this merger solution is being seriously considered by the boards of both MoCC and PNCA. My cautionary stance is thus: this proposal puts a lot of eggs in one basket and requires a lot of discipline to pull off. Put it this way, Portland loves to collaborate but it isn't great at creating well-defined (and thus fundable) institutions. Only PAM under Ferriso's tenure has really gotten things right in the institutional discipline sense and that example goes back only 2 years.
The Museum Of Contemporary Craft (photo Basil Childers)
The idea of PNCA merging with (ie absorbing) the
troubled Museum of Contemporary Craft has been kicking around for a few
weeks and I feel cautious about this elegant solution of necessity becoming the
mother of invention. For example, nobody wants PNCA to get overextended in juggling
such a multinodal approach as they are already dealing with growing pains. There is a reason Reed, PSU, OCAC, PAM, PICA,
L&C and PNCA don't combine into one silly Voltron
like multi-robot, multi-acronym cultural monstrosity. Autonomy has advantages too, but in this case
that might mean MoCC's demise and a continued hole in PNCA's progam.
The Art of Obama blog ran the
inaugural address through wordle today. It probably isn't great art and
definitely pales in comparison to the actual swearing in of Barak Obama but
it's interesting how Presidential words get fetished. Americans only elect extremely
strong leaders when we really need them like; Washington, Lincoln, the Rooseveldts
and now Obama. As a historian I've felt weve been in need of our own Marshall
Plan level reprioritization of our civic, cultural and individual values. Not
since FDR have we had a President that is both willing and charged with such
a task by his election mandate. In a cultural context, art does best when humans
reconsider their priorities and instead of the straw man and rather deserved
scapegoating of Bush the art world will need to truly investigate our options
more fully than the past 8 years or so have given us. Art also needs peace and
a certain stability to fully flourish, may the next four years provide it...
It is official, one of Portland's newest and best art galleries, Quality
Pictures, will close this coming Saturday (*Update to Update - it's going to take a bit of time before anything definitive can be stated. It definitely seems like business partnership restructuring drama and the gallery is currently closed with a contact on the door). It's best to just let this play out.
Robert Motherwell, Elegy to the Spanish Republic (Basque Elegy), 1967
Oil on canvas 82 ¼ x 138 inches, Private Collection. Location: 2nd floor,
JCMCA Portland Art Museum
It has been a a year or two since we've seen a nice Robert
Motherwell "Elegy" at the Portland Art Museum, but this latest
guest is by far the nicest one I've seen in Portland in the near decade I've
been living here. In case you are unfamiliar, Motherwell... (more)
Richmond Burton, Untitled 1997, The Dorothy and Herbert Vogel Collection: 50 works for 50 States
The Portland Art
Museum has been given a generous gift of 50 works from super collectors
Dorothy
and Herbert Vogel. The Vogels, known for championing cutting edge minimalist
and conceptual work are dispersing their 2500 work collection to 50
museums in 50 states. If you are unfamiliar with their story, it's worth
checking out here and here.
Dorothy and Herbert Vogel living within their collection
The Vogels weren't wealthy and lived in a small New York City apartment, yet
managed to be some of the best collectors of artists like Richard Tuttle and
Robert Mangold. Among the 50 works going to the Portland Art museum is Richmond
Burton's "Untitled" from 1997, it's one of his best known works (probably because of the Vogels) and dovetails
nicely with the Clement Greenberg Collection, acquired in 2000. Other artists
included are John Hultberg and Dike
Blair.
PAM's Northwest Film center will screen Sasaki's documentary Herb
and Dorothy on March 28th and 29th. Thank you Herbert and Dorothy Vogel
for generously sharing your personal obsession with us, may you inspire others
to follow your incredible example.
(PS I always love it when PORT gets a scoop simply by reading the museum's
membership magazine.
Tyler Green's wonderful
remembrance of Betty Freeman illustrates the all important difference between
being a just a collector/donor and being a true patron. It's a deep... quantum level of involvement and personal investment in the artists and cultural organizations that makes a huge difference. I'm working on a historical
post that looks at influential patrons (a hot topic in Portland these days).
Randy Gragg interviewed Miguel
Rosales about the two possible Willamette river bridge options. Man I miss
Randy's contributions to the O, whose architecture coverage since his departure
has flagged (though this piece by Brian Libby is a start... there really is no replacement for an architecture and design critic, except a full-time architecture and design critic... especially in a city where design is a major industry). Here's what
PORT had to say on the new bridge designs a while back. We want new pictures
of the wave design so we can more fully assess it... maybe there will be new
images at Rosales upcoming talk on Monday night at Jimmy Mak's (door opens at 5)?
Yes, Ill have PORT's 2008 roundup posted by Saturday night (now that the show I've
been assisting on had its wonderful opening last night... it is always art first).
Here's Richard
Speer's take on 2008.
The O has posted their 2008
roundup... I'll have PORT's very detailed, multifaceted roundup posted soon (I'm helping install a very technically demanding show). PORT's analysis should give everyone something meaty to chew on.
Ok it's 2009, but it is also the last weekend for these four interesting shows
held over from 2008.
Livia Marin, Form Follows Variation
The Museum
of Contemporary Craft's Manufractured. There are a lot of highlights in this
massive group show, including Regis Mayot and Jason Rogenes (a personal favorite). Show runs through January 4th (it's free too but consider becoming a member)
2008 may be the year that most everyone I know can't wait to leave behind but
it was easily PORT's best year ever. Tomorrow I'll post PORT's annual year in
review.
Till then, here's a list of just a few of our standouts from 2008:
Great news,
MOCA will survive as an autonomous institution... when it is Govan vs. Broad,
Broad
always wins. Also, why is there even a Govan vs. Broad dynamic? It isn't just
that Broad has the money, it is that he is a smart donor who forces institutions
to do the right thing. It takes involved and principled donors, not just people
who write checks. I can also add that it's way easier to deal with the Broad
Foundation's press office than MOCA's.
Before the calendar takes a break for the holidays, I wanted to share a little good news from the RACC. They have collected record funds to award in grants in 2009 to artists, nonprofits, and arts education. Eloise Damrosch, executive director of the RACC, reminds us that supporting the arts is essential to the health of the community in difficult times: "Without question, artists and arts organizations make our community a better place to live, and they need our support now more than ever. Just imagine what it would be like if we didn't have the arts to get us through this difficult time; the arts bring us together, to challenge and entertain us. The arts give us hope."
Enjoy the snow, I'll be back December 29. (PORT will still be updated but have more sporadic posts during the holiday week)
It looks like MOCA is going to be saved (in the most culturally responsible
way), here's the LA
Times report. It looks like director Jeremy Strick might be out.
Carl Andre, 8 Blocks and Stones, 1973
Concrete blocks and river stones (from Portland), Each: 11 1/2 x 11 3/4 x 3 1/2 in. (29.2 x 29.8 x 8.9 cm)
The Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles The Barry Lowen Collection
85.36
Terry Toedtemeier speaking at the Wild Beauty press conference
PORT is extremely saddened to report that Terry Toedtemeier, the Portland Art
Museum's indispensable curator of photography has passed away. More details to
come but his life's work can be seen in what I consider to be the year's most important show, Wild
Beauty.
He died last night and collapsed while speaking in Hood River about the Wild Beauty show. Also, he had a recent history of heart problems.
It is a terrible and tragic loss, he had such a sweet presence that was coupled with an utterly contageous passion for photography, geology and life. We will all miss him and our thoughts are with his family and loved ones.
The community has lost a giant but we gained immeasurably through his efforts.
Last night I really enjoyed Morley
Safer's interview with Julian Schnabel on 60 minutes... mostly for the artists
hilarious meltdown over what Robert Hughes wrote years ago. First Schnabel was
offended that Safer even brought his nemesis up. Then Schnabel wouldn't drop Hughes as the subject.
(tsk tsk, overreacting to a critic is a telling sign of massive insecurities and
a more self aware artist knows how to take a punch...). As far as press goes Safer
is a pretty pleasant interviewer... why get all Khan vs Kirk with him, why attack
Safer so personally as a proxy for Kirk (erm I mean Hughes)? Still, I admire Schnabel
as a film director (though all the footage which was lost then resurfaced in
Downtown 81 certainly
laid the groundwork for Schnabel's own Basquiat
film) but as a painter he's a second or 3rd rate practitioner compared to his
contemporaries Basquiat and Anselm Kiefer. Still I need to see his latest film The
Diving Bell and The Butterfly.
I always enjoy it when an artist sucessfully finds a way to infiltrate more mainstream
events and Keith
Haring's balloon, (Untitled) Figure with Heart, in today's Macy's
Thanksgiving Day Parade gave me reason to watch a little bit of the otherwise
very top 40 spectacle. It continues Macy's Blue Sky Gallery Series of contemporary
balloons, you can
watch it here.
Often, I find post-mortem work like this problematic but Haring had expressed
an interest in this before his untimely demise. Also, someone like Paul McCarthy would make it a parade to remember for sure!
Tyler reports that MOCA's board is gonna gather tonight with the purpose solidifying MOCA's vulnerable position. They may dine together as a group, but the whole affair is about not eating crow.
Here is an online petition so you can voice your support for MOCA.
The recently unveiled Powell's
redesign isnt that good. cmon... a building housing that many architecture
and design books just can't look like a suburban strip mall in Northbrook Illinois!
It is interesting that board members of a very important institution are being held to task.... also a heads up, PORT's Arcy Douglass was out at Double Negative (part of MOCA's collection) a few weeks ago and his post on it will be up in an hour.
Tyler's post on MOCA's fate is the must read art news post of the month. He's right, in my mind MOCA has supplanted The Walker, The Guggenheim and The Whitney as the world's most cutting-edge art museum programmatically. Speaking of cultural mergers, I don't think the Guggenheim is in any position to merge with them as their LA satellite.
Overall, with a dwindling endowment and no recent expansion or capital campaigns one wonders at the strange lack of ambition in LA (a place with no shortages of such). Here's the LA Times on the subject. I might add more to this later today, but it is uber-odd that such a major institution would be facing such last ditch decisions... of course cultural institutions should raise alarms when they are in trouble but if they look confused it doesn't help. It does help that MOCA's progamming warrants saving.
The talks of a merger between LACMA and MOCA also seem terribly strained to me... MOCA losing its excellent collection also clips its wings for any future growth, branding it as a failed experiment. Like Knight stated, the first steps are a staff reduction as a good faith move then they need a bridge loan and a smart capaital campaign. Punting on MOCA is bad for LA, and the entire US... how about a bridge loan from the city rather than a weakened (merged) MOCA?
PNCA has a new Vice President for College Advancement (fundraising), Deborah
Hopkinson. With 20 years of experience with OSU etc. she is a smart move. In
2
years PNCA takes over the 511 building from the government and their 32
million dollar centennial campaign will need a very steady hand using long range
planning for major gifts during these difficult financial times. The campaign
should be in overdrive by the time the economy is crawling out of the anticipated
slump for the next year or so.
Skylab's Root Award's winner (office space) for North
Portland Architecture discusses Portland
Spaces Root Awards for design. Sorry, but I can't help making some weak
pun about how design has been putting down ever deeper roots in Portland. See
the first
Root Awards here. Overall, I'm still mulling over my reaction to the awards... they
were a
lot like the first Contemporary Northwest Art Awards, not bad... but not
a revelation either. The important thing is that awards enhance a sense of achievement
by spotlighting it, that is what cities do... they give talent a platform. Awards
are a type of recurring platform. Now if only the O
would stop turning editors into writers and hire an achitecture and design
critic... the single most important writing job in the city can't be left to
freelancers because follow-through is key!
Peter Schjeldahl looks at both Franz
West and Mary Heilmann. I'm continually impressed with West but Heilmann
(whose show I saw at OCMA) is frankly pretty uneven and not that surprising.
Throw in Chris Johanson, Rachel Harrison and Carol Bove and there is a real
case for a Paul Klee fanclub revival going on as of late.
The Oregonian gives more details on the downsizing
at the Museum of Contemporary Craft (a PORT sponsor). All of this just seems
like prudent preparation much like the direction
the Portland Art Museum undertook last year (another PORT sponsor). One
big problem though is the lack of an endowment, it's tough to be a true museum
without an endowment. Only once they have an adequate endowment can the MOCC
transition fully from a sales gallery with an exhibition program into a full
museum. It is also worth reminding everyone that the MOCC's supporters still
have significant means and the museum shouldn't water down great programming
like the Natzler
show or the more contemporary lexicon in Manufractured.
Still, MoCC needs both types of shows (classic and experimental) to remain valid...
Our Garth
Clark interview makes that necessity as plain as can be.... and it is also
why curator Namita Wiggers is the most necessary person at the institution.
She brings their programming to the museum level, now they need an endowment
that matches the curatorial seriousness. Wiggers is simply one of the best curators
in her field and key. Ill have something on Portland's creative economy soon,
there are sobering facts that everyone already seems prepared for as well as
some serious opportunities. In general, Portland typically gains a lot of entrepreneurial
talent during recessions.
Roberta Smith has an interesting piece on theanyspacewhatsoever
show at the Guggenheim, rightly questioning why it is comprised of, "a
group of the usual suspects," who seem to show up in blockbuster contemporary
museum shows frequently. Looks like a fine show that we've seen many times before
in London
and even Portland
way back in 2000. Maybe with "Change" being the active term in
this election cycle the art world will be forced to find some new names in the
Post-Bush era?
Also in the NYT's Holland Carter calls Miro
an artistic "serial murder"... I don't buy that, he seems more
like a satirist of human ideologies and habits... kind of the Steve
Martin of Spanish modernists, it's definitely physical comedy with a flair
for the philosophical. Miro's work could have easily said, "Wellllllll
EXC-ccc-CCC-UUUUUSE MEEEEEEEEEEEE!" while wearing an arrow through the
head hat while playing the banjo.
A lot of so called "balanced" journalists try to make it seem like
the sky is falling (panic is good for selling dead trees... hmm?) so it's good
that Tyler Green pops a few of the WSJ's doom balloons in his discussion of
museum
economics in these erratic financial times today. (I'll discuss local economics
next week) To be sure some institutions are going to be challenged (especially
SAM
which partnered with Washington Mutual) but institutions like the Portland
Art Museum saw this coming (and likewise so did most of their major patrons).
The meeting wasn't about revealing anything new about the design or process,
it was more of a "read between the lines" moment and getting a measure
of the architect and project. Here's a PDF
that details where we are now and covers most of the presentation today.
What came out "between the lines" was this:
1st priority is following all of the federal guidelines... (more)
Metallica drummer Lars
Ulrich is selling his excellent Basquiat "Boxer." My favorite
part of this NYT's piece is Lar's quote, "Its perhaps the last frontier
where the best of the best will not go the way of the rest of the economy.
Is it possible that improbable quality and artistic dedication are recession
proof? ...well I think it only holds true for "Basquiats", not lighter weights like Matthew
Day Jackson. Sure he's sincere but he isn't that perceptive or poetic. My
take is that Basquiat is on another level and his values will probably only
improve. Other proven, transcendent artists (Justine Kurland, Chris Johanson) will transcend this financial crisis and those
that follow art market trends will follow broader financial market trends.
Also, in the NYT's Roberta
Smith explains why Elizabeth Peyton matters. I concur, seriously at what
time were beauty and youth not worthy of our attention? Peyton transcends the
stupider tabloid stuff in the media and exemplifies why we find young and beautiful
people perpetually fascinating. At Peyton's best, she gives her subjects a grace
and existential fragility they never really had but for a moment. Some think
this is slight but it's like arguing against flowers, you can do it... but at
the cost of acknowledging you might have a dead black heart. Frankly I find viewing a Peyton painting more satifying than TMZ's celeb gawking.
Finally, Tyler
and I disagree about Peyton. It seriously freaks me out that we both like
so many of the same artists like Clifford Still, enjoy tennis, blogging and kick ass architecture
etc. Maybe it's our Midwestern/West Coast roots?
Also, check out Jen
Graves WACK post. Though I find the ads at the left that state, "find
your inner slut," a bit incongruous with the post.
Primer and welcoming committee for Reversed Reality
As Megan mentioned earlier Reversed
Reality opens tomorrow and Worksound plays Portland host to 5 of the 6 artists.
Here's a little primer on the artists from Hong Kong and Senegal. I'm certain youve seen some of these artists at recent Portland openings but let's give them a big Portland welcome tomorrow.
When I spoke to them today, the four artists from Hong Kong, all thought Portland had a young art scene
with a more relaxed attitude than Hong Kong... focusing more on the work rather
than purely career driven pursuits:
For this piece, Doris Wong collected postcards from Portland art events and assiduously copied
each of them. Wong's copies are on the right, the originals are displayed on... (more)
Cloepfil's MAD @ 2 Columbus Circle amongst its neighbors. Photo Michael Paul Oman-Reagan
Brad
Cloepfil's incredibly contentious 2 Columbus Circle opens tomorrow and the
NYT's gives it some pretty faint praise along with a fair amount of criticism.
Personally, I feel the project flies in the face of all these highly performative
and histrionic buildings architects have been putting up lately and that is bold in a different way. The real question
is how does it reframe the Columbus Circle and how well do its galleries work?
It just seems like everyone wanted this thing to do a jig but what Brad has
done is create a more useable and subtle building. I think there is room for
subtle in New York.
Also, check out part
1of PORT's interview with Brad Cloepfil and get ready for the super massive
part 2, it's the longest interview we've ever done and I hope to have it up
very soon so check back.
The Henry in Seattle has announced The Brink,
a biennial art award (funded by the Behnke's) that will go to a single deserving
artist from Oregon, Washington or British Columbia. Similar to the CNAA's
it will take nominations from local art worlders. Check out the details at The
Stranger. I'm particularly tickled that they are including Canada in the mix.
Art awards galvanize a more civic discussion over an artists work as well as the
region's overall support for interesting new art, so you can never really have
too many art awards.
Word has it PAM's first Arlene Schnitzer Curator of Northwest Art, Jennifer
Gately has quit. She certainly has had a challenging role to fulfill (bridging
historical and contemporary concerns) and PORT thinks her record of mostly positive
reviews here says it all... it certainly gives an accurate picture of what kind
of curator she is. Also her recent re-install of the Hoffman galleries is spacious and uncluttered (if only the rest of the collection were the same... I hear a re-install is coming). Her eventual replacement will inherit an exciting and
challenging situation in one of the country's most active art scenes.
Here are our reviews and other posts in chronologically descending order:
Despite the crashing stock market today there will be new condos by HdeM
and OMA
in NYC... both have already broken ground and something tells me the people
who already bought their penthouses will still be able to afford these. Funny
how NYC can get cool condos by HdeM
and Koolhaas
but hasn't been capable of
realizing museums designed by these two topnotch talents. Architecture is
always defined by the client and though I'm sure the condos will be nice...
no high density residential design can hope to take very many chances... and
certainly not as many as a museum project could conceivably afford.
Yes, I'm still on the road but we will have a great review for you saturday. Plus I have reviews of Jeff Koons at the MCA, an interview with one of the most exciting young artists today, then there's part II of PORT's interview with Brad Cloepfil (here's part I) and a round robin of exciting museum shows in the Midwest. Dang that is a lot of stuff... Plus PORT's other writers are covering Portland.
Damien Hirst's The Kingdom of The Father at PAM last Fall
My take, "journalists" are primarily a knee jerk reaction in the written record and they are probably pretty sick of having Hirst jerking them every month for the past 15 years. They are kind of addicted to him but nothing they say about him changes anything anymore... so it feels like everyone is on automatic pilot and everyone feels a little used.
I'm a historian so I don't have the twitchy fingers of a journalist... so I'll make this historical prediction, Hirst is going to be THE artist of the 90's and likely the aughts as well. Sure not all of his work is great but a great deal of it is very good compared to the rest of Chelsea's best fare. My favorite stuff was in the 90's (way better than Matthew Barney in the aughts) but I still think he turns out enough good work to take seriously now... just like Koons he's in it for the long haul and has entered that point where he's competing only with himself. Hirst is still the artist who best exemplifies our age. Life, death, Pop, minimalism, media tweaking/manipulation etc... he has it all. Including a penchant for avoiding museums.
I'm in beautiful Des Moines Iowa, home of the fantastic Des Moines Art Center and Ill have some things for you later today and tomorrow. Till then here are some links.
Jerry Saltz takes a look at the somewhat indecisive curatorial directions of MoMA and the Guggenheim... with some analysis on how it might change with new leadership situations.
I'm traveling right now but I'll have several posts for you in the next two days, including a review this weekend. I've already seen an incredible show called Sensory Overload in Milwaukee and I've yet to make my way through Chicago etc. Till then check out:
The NYT's reviews Looking
at Music at MoMA... does anybody question Bowie's influence musically or
visually? ...or is that something only his kid's might be able to do?
Peter Plagens has published first two installments of his on line novel The
Art Critic on Artnet.
For those who thought it was all gloom and doom when Motel and Small A galleries closed they didn't know that two new galleries run by two of Portland's smartest redheads were opening:
Fontanelle is run by Leslie Miller, a former Artforum staffer who has been
helping Stephanie Synder out at Reed. We are happy to see that her first show,
which opens September 4th features one of Motel's best artists Meg Peterson
and one of my personal faves Shanon Schollian. It's in Chambers old space. Chambers
is moving across town.
Fourteen30 is opening
September 26th in the old Savage/Small A space.
Tyler reported that Richard Diebenkorn (who was born in Portland but moved
at age 2) will finally have an
Ocean Park series retrospective.
New Gallery news: Jeanine Jablonski (who has been working for Elizabeth Leach
and created GLARE quarterly) is opening a new gallery fourteen30 in the old
Small A/Savage space (watch this
site). First show in September will feature the work of Los Angeles based
artist, Devon
Oder, Breaking Light. Besides national, local and international artists (is there a difference anymore?) she will focus on art
publications.
Peter Schjeldahl's latest
piece is a Must Read. It's one of those rare occasions where the critic's
analysis of the show is more worth while and telling than the exhibition
itself. The long and short of it is, the second artists start making gestures
at becoming very serious again we suddenly expect the work to transcend all
of the museum blockbusters and art fairs that have lowered the level of expectations
for art during the past decade. Finally, PS has taken on younger artists instead
of his typically brilliant laurel wreaths for the likes of Bruce Nauman and
Ed
Ruscha. We know those guys are good, what we want now is a new crop with
a similar level of rigor and achievement.
On a more regional level (but not strictly so), I'll be on Oregon Public Broadcasting's
Think
Out Loud tomorrow at 9:00 AM with curator Jennifer Gately, Dan Attoe and
Richard Speer to discuss the Contemporary
Northwest Art Awards and their impact on the regional art scene (though
artists like Attoe have pretty
bitch'n international careers already so it opens some complicated and impossible
to categorize discussions of regionalism in an internationally decentralized
art world).
The New York Times Sunday Book Review did
its thing on Erin Hogan's book, "SPIRAL JETTA A Road Trip Through
the Land Art of the American West. " It is a cute title that in its own
irreverence reifies a certain reverence for these often not so roadside attractions.
I got a kick out of Vanderbilt's review and the book itself is probably targeted
for the overeducated who haven't spent much time alone in a car and suspect
they are missing something of the American experience (they are).... it's no
wonder the Jetty is replaced by the Jetta. Artvergugen?
Holland Cotter takes on the expected
onslaught of summer group shows. The funny thing about Portland is we have
a lot of good solo shows in the summer. We get a lot of Bay Area and New York
tourists during July and August so it's worth putting on good solo shows.
In case you missed it like me, here is a
transcription of last Tuesday's PDXplore discussion at PNCA. Ahh the question
is... will Portland grow a pair or simply take a prophylactic approach to the
coming population surge? Eunuch is eunuch... no more complacency ok? Portland
isn't defined by Portland's past... it can only
direct those redefining outside forces.
Edward
Winkleman is clamping down on his comments... in the past his site has had
some of the most lively debates about art in his comment section, but lately
its gone south. It's true, moderating comments is a drain on time but there
is an interesting dynamic to having reader feedback; it often reveals more facets
to the story. About this time last year I was seriously considering removing
comments altogether from PORT but after a period of clamping down I think people
have gotten the gist... strong opinions are fine but no personal attacks.
My post was simple
common sense from an aesthetictician, with the added power of some decent
pictures. Even the Oregonian's editorial board has started to play
catch up (Calatrava is good but we need something more radical like Hadid,
UN Studio etc., Calatrava has already peaked and less likely to reinvent the
bridge for the 21st century... he already reinvented it for the late 20th.).
Actually what the O really needs is an architecture critic. Hire Brian
Libby, simply using him freelance isn't enough, it's the difference between
a personal body guard and a rent a cop... for the O to do it's job during this
major design upheaval in Portland it needs someone who would take a bullet.
Randy Gragg did heroic things like insist on a design competition for the Tram.
BTW that's exactly what we need for the I-5 bridge, scrape together a couple
of hundred grand and invite Hadid, UN Studio, Foster, Cloepfil, Toyo Ito and
Monolab etc. The ideas and
buzz it will generate will be more than worth it, giving the finalist and all
of us a
much better bridge. If an architect from outside the area is chosen no big
deal, most big jobs have a local firm partnered as well.
Barnett Newman's Canto #7, full set on display now
The Portland Art Museum has shuffled more than a little bit around with some very
distinguished guests including Barnett Newman and Andy Warhol (a more sweeping
rehang of the nearly 3 year old Jubitz Center for Contemporary Art should be expected
an a year or two). Also, There's the new Marc
Dombrosky show at Apex (I found it underwhelming; crafty sewing + human desperation
has been done with more legitimacy and
personal investment by Tracey Emin). Check it out though, it's kinda fun to
sharpen one's teeth on (BTW what's with all the attention paid to weak examples
of Seattle art at PAM lately?). That said the Contemporary
Northwest Art Awards and the awesome Ed
Ruscha show are absolutely worth a trip, even from out of state.
Besides the programming you gotta check out:
A complete set of
Barnett Newman's 18 Cantos 1963-64. These are no ordinary prints, this is
a complete set of the most important prints in the last 108 years. Simply sublime,
they are fittingly are on display in the Greenberg room of the Jubitz Center beneath
the Calder.
Ursula Von Rydingsvard's P's and Q's is a compelling addition to PAM's strong
sculpture collection (nice that PAM has made a point of collecting from artists
in its two solo show exhibition series).
There is also a tiny Andy Warhol shadow painting on the third floor of the Jubitz
center.
It's Disjecta, again... and again... and again. Long time Portlanders are probably pretty familiar with this promotional routine, and have already formed their opinions. For those of you who don't know the history, PORT takes a look back and a look forward after the jump. (More.)
I'll have a pretty complicated review for you later today (*I lied, but its coming soon). Till then here are
some links:
Tyler Green is excited about
Fritz Haeg, we are too and he will be showing at
Reed this Fall. His talk
at PSU was one of the highlights year last year, he's a major artist. (Aside)
during undergrad I had a nasty habit of planting delicious swiss chard in my
alma mater's many flower beds... let's just say the food service on campus did
not provide a lot of things I found edible!
The Expanded Field discusses Public Art in LA. We have 2% for art up here...
but we are a long way from being Chicago, which IMHO
has the best collection of recent public art on earth. How good? the last
time I was there my more vocally inspiring GF and I spontaneously broke into
a version of the Everly
Brothers "All I have to do is Dream" replacing that lyric with
"Bean"... the nickname for Anish Kapoor's incredible Cloud
Gate sculpture. No other public art has even a remote chance of provoking
public song! (thankfully)...
Portland City Council insists on building the right bridge for I-5
Mayor elect and current transpo commish, Sam Adams, has just released a statement
on the I-5 bridge that calls for much of what
I called for several weeks ago here by insisting that the bridge;
"Inspire a green, 'postcard-worthy' design. This should be the world's
most environmentally friendly bridge in design, construction, and operations.
Any bridge is an icon, and this one must aesthetically enhance the world-class
grandeur of the Columbia River and Mount Hood. And it must be sensitive to its
neighbors by helping knit together the two halves of Hayden Island and downtown
Vancouver."
Right on! As I wrote a few weeks ago there is only one way to achieve those
goals, hire
a world class architect to design the I-5 bridge. Design competition anyone? A competition and successful design would go a long way in convincing more world class design, technology and green industries that Portland isn't all talk... resulting in more jobs and a healthier planet strategy we can export.
Sam's office also states, "The approval today only moves the bridge project
proposal from one phase of evaluation to the next. It establishes the assumption
for the next phase of study that the existing bridge will be replaced with no
more travel lanes than exist today and that it must include an expansion of
lightrail." Read more on Sam's
blog.
It's time for bridge city to show the world a new kind of bridge. Isolationists who would do nothing (aka turn Oregon into a fortress) miss the fact that this is a golden opportunity to do the right thing for once (with major federal $$ prioritized as one of 6 corridors of the future, meaning it doesn't keep us from getting other funding for other projects). Time to be progressive about the challenges ahead folks, not provincially anachronistic. Cars and more people will be around in 100 years (hopefully running on cold fusion, hydrogen or the hot air generated by art critics)... so underbuilding something that will outlive us isn't an intelligent option.
Regina Hackett had a nice lil interview
with Christopher Rauschenberg. I particularly liked the question about dance...
because for those who are paying attention, Chris is absolutely the most awesome
dancer in Portland. At Elizabeth Leach's 25th anniversary party I remember him
just opening a massive can of dance whupass as a crowd of artists and curators
stood watching from the shadows contemplating just how terribly unfunky we were
by comparison. Yeah, that's right he dances like Travolta and sounds just like
his dad.
Edward Winkleman took on the question
of beauty, craft and its "antipode of convenience" in the constellation of artistic intent, conceptualism.
There is no right answer and for my money the best possible outcome is the one
where the philosophy and execution are capable of simultaneously undermining
and reinforcing one another. When something leans too heavilly on craft or conceptual
formula it is just dead to me, a spent force. Something has to be at risk for it to be intellectually/experientially
salient. Simply putting a marble in some cream cheese in the center of a room
or a giant gold dildo that shines like the sun isn't enough.... I want an aesthetic
and intellectual program to be presented in a way that I can both come back
to and or forget when I'm viewing. Still, the end result can't be too didactic or controlling of the viewer in making its gestalt. Perhaps, the follow through is the most important
part of visual art and at a certain point the artist fades as the work remains?
Also, yes I am hard on the schlub... so when DK
Row writes a nice piece on Robert Rauschenberg's final works (on view at
Bluesky) I feel duty bound to point it out. If you are gonna be tough it helps
to be fair too. I actually like defending him... (more)
Today, Tennessee, by 2006 Oregon Biennial artist Benjamin Buswell opens
as the final exhibition at the Tilt
gallery in the Everett Station Lofts. PORT was the first to tell you this
would be
a place to watch 2.5 years ago and it has really held up. Regardless whether any particular show was a success or fell flat, the trek to Tilt was always rewarding because of the surprise and professionalism that could be counted on.
Tilt has had a comparatively long run at "the lofts" for the husband
and wife team of Jenene Nagy and Josh Smith who have another project, TILT Export,
which will do independent curation while focusing more on their personal studio
time. Jenene is also curator for PSU's Autzen gallery and was PORT's business
manager for 2007.
Typically these alt space live/work Everett
Station Loft galleries last only a year and at 2.5 years it's a good run
for Tilt...(more)
Tyler Green is right about these Gertrude
Stein's twins, makes me wonder what a whole show of Gertrude Stein portraits would
be like? Kind of like an intellectually superior night of the living dead?!
Zaha Hadid's Shiekh Zayed Bridge... it is time to up the ante on the new I-5 Columbia River crossing
On Tuesday night it was announced that the Columbia
River Crossing Taskforce has recommended that an entirely new bridge be
built to replace the aging pair of bridges that constitute the only remaining
lift spans on I-5. What hasn't been discussed much are the opportunities
that the estimated 4.2 billion dollar project opens for a new type of bridge,
one designed to meet 21st century ecological and humanistic pressures. By not
putting an onus on smarter design the project has negatively polarized some
that would otherwise welcome a better bridge.
Yes the bridge is controversial but it's also the single best opportunity for
Portland to put its money where it's mouth is, ethically, aesthetically, ecologically
and technologically about being a progressive city. We aren't fond of cars here
or more people, but they are unavoidable. Portlanders do however prefer better design,
mass transit, human scale experiences, nature and green building ideas. The
Tribune's
article today emphasizes how the project must have MAX train mass transit.
Ok that's a start, but it needs more...(more)
Second, we don't usually plug fundraisers on PORT but PSU's
online auction provides scholarships for their students. Some of the artist's
included are Chris
Johanson, Robert Pruitt, Fritz
Haeg, Jim Drain, James Lavadour, Storm
Tharp, Bruce Conkle, Dan Attoe, Mads Lynnerup, Harrell Fletcher and Rigo
23 etc. It's a great opportunity to help PSU art students and score some good
pieces. Also, we hear Harrell's "The
American War" was recently added to MoMA's collection.
Lastly, this
interview in the O simply wasn't fit to print. Apparently the editors over
there either don't care that they have a credibility problem or simply want
to heckle Portland's art scene. Either way it's shamefully passive aggressive
and a wasted hatchet job effort. Soliciting JV level questions to ask the curator
was a cop out too. Note, Jen Graves of the Stranger is more respected in the
area arts community and got a much
better interview.
A very well written review of TJ
Norris' Infinitus show at NAAU by Richard Speer. BTW the WWeek is starting to have more art coverage again and I think ditching the listings for a few short reviews is better... it's about time, what about some features?
Last Friday the City Club hosted Tom Manley with Brad Cloepfil and Sohrab Vossoughi
of Ziba Design to discuss
Portland's "Creative Grid". Basically it was about networking Portland's
creative institutions, firms and individuals. You
can listen to it here. Overall this is an important shift in Portland's
strategic future as the city is networking the hell out of itself in a way that
lets creative types get in on the ground floor.
I liked several things about this rather 19th century style public forum at
the City Club. First the word "excellence" was used frequently (if
only both of our Mayoral candidates did the same, whoever gets the job needs
to take their cues from these 3 Portlanders and a few others...). Second, Brad
Cloepfil made a great point about being honest about our goals and instead of
trying to do it all (like some arts institutions attempt) we need to focus on
what we can do that is truly excellent. Finally, the best bit was when Cloepfil
responded to a the question about money and funding (a red herring) by stating
that Portland needs to "Get Over It" and should focus on doing things
at a high level instead (I suspect that will bring more money in 5-10 years). The trick is to not get self satified or think that spending lots of money leads to excellence.
I've been saying the same
thing for years, the actual amount of money matters less than how it is
used. We simply need to ask better questions like my favorite gripe, "are
the projects and institutions we are funding raising the level or of discussion,
ideas and execution rather than simply existing to create communities of mediocrity.
Communities are good but they matter most when they challenge themselves to
be better rather than self-congratulatory.
Roberta
Smith looked at a show of artistic mash-ups. Sounds like people are looking
for something new and trying to see what happens when 2 artists are artificially
put together. Of course when its not artificial as in Jasper
Johns and Robert Rauschenberg (rivals, lovers etc.) that's when art gets
radicalized in exciting ways. I don't think those days are gone.
Last but not least Art Blogging LA has unleashed its redesigned
site.
Personally, I've always loved stained glass and learned how to execute art
deco designs when I was 8 because my Mother was doing the same. Later, I was
near contentiously exposed to Frank
Lloyd Wright's work and eventually boned up on historical examples like
Chartres,
La Sainte-Chapelle
and Matisse's
project in Vence. As for the sacred/secular debate, I don't think it matters
much... many Christian artists were pretty heretical while pursuing their work.
I also think there is an odd double standard, nobody cares if an architect of
a church like Philip
Johnson, Moneo
or Frank Lloyd Wright were religiously compatible with the congregation's beliefs.
I always appreciate it when churches choose to employ top talent, it is a civic
responsibility and the poetics of talent producing tolerance are undeniable.
Brian Libby over at Portland Architecture gave a welcome recap of Brad
Cloepfil's chat at Jimmy Mak's. Interesting how he appreciated the Pearl
District as a decent effort that sets the stage for some possibly superb buildings
in the future. Right now the only above average architecture is his W+K headquarters,
a couple of galleries and the Holst architects projects of PNCA (with a stellar
paintjob by Randy Higgins) and Rivertek. With the 511 building and Holst's Ziba
Design HQ's there is a sense that some exiciting work is about to be built.
Also, what is Powells gonna do with their remodel/addition? The Portland art
scene can always use more interesting exhibition spaces and even the new condo's
have interesting lobby installation opportunities.
The Mercury reviewed the
Jess show. After the Cornell
retrospective at SFMOMA last year and an unrelenting string of lesser shows
in Portland I'm gonna have trouble taking in more collage art. Still, this sounds
promisingly obsessive. With collage art I remain wary... "more" seldom
is MORE, with Cornell being the benchmark for how to do it right. After Rauschenberg's death I'm feeling even more picky, though Anna Fidler is really starting to take off. Come to think of it collage is a lot like making a stained glass window.
Canyon, 1959, Combine on canvas, 81 3/4 x 70 x 24 in.
Robert Rauschenberg has passed away at age 82 of heart failure, here
is the New York Times obit. A great artist and massively influential,
PORT's thoughts are with his friends and family.
With his ultra influential combines and even moreso silk-screens, Rauschenberg's place
in history is secure as one of art's great alchemists. Without Rauschenbergs's mental muscle and protean
reinvention you wouldn't have Warhol (silk-screen), Johns or even Sigmar
Polke (silk-screen), Anselm
Kiefer (combines) and Jean
Michel Basquiat whose cypher-like pictorial organization owed much to seminal
works like Factum
I and II.
My favorite Rauschenberg would have to be Canyon, a work so loaded of with
rich associative properties it may be the most telling American representative
of Post WWII... it's simply all there; ironic nationalism, stylistic conflicts,
poetic hypocrisy, personal asides etc. Hilariously, the fact that Rauchenberg
used a bald eagle insures that the work cannot be bought and sold (a protected animal). Also, turning that
eagle into a magpie.. a predator turned into imposter... a symbol becomes a chameleon
etc.. is simply unbeatable when discussing art and American politics/life.
Portland Architecture has a great post on PSU's Social
Practice classroom on Alberta. An innovative project, the structure will
be designed to be moved from site to site, interracting with the various neighborhoods
that Portland is famous for.
Nan Curtis at Linfield (detail)
It's that last weekend for The
Dancer at PAM (an excellent scholarly effort) and Saturday is the last day
for Nan
Curtis' show at Linfield
College, always worth the drive and extra fun if you work in some wine tasting
in the area.
Roberta
Smith chimes in on the 55th Carnegie International... her complaint is its
lack of teeth. Tyler Green seems to have seen a different show, partly because
the Vija
Celmins did something for him. (Celmins usually delivers but what about
the newer names?) The elephant in the room is this question, "are all these
international shows the same uninspired show created through a preapproved list
of familiar names and or ideas? Has brand, inclusivity of various practices
and global ubiquity trumped the shock of the new?" Look, it's a change
election year and similarly I suspect many people simply want a different art
world... the Carnegie is proabbly allright but when
they went to Mars it looks like they brought the same old artists. All of
the biennials are suffering from a fatigue of the overly familiar (brought on
by a smaller world and a lot of shows). Artblog
also has some nice coverage.
Andrew Goldstein wonders what
P.S.1 will be like without Alanna Heiss? As of late the institution has been
morphing into more of an establishment venue with the Greater New York shows
etc. and a connection to MoMA... it's the way things tend to go. Really anything
that isn't a fusty musty academic institution will tend
to fall victim to its own successes (see MoMA, Dia, Guggenheim) and it's why
Judd took to Marfa and even that outpost has become a fetish of remoteness.
Look, if Walter Hopps could somehow mellow and take on an old sage-like patina in his last
years anyone and any institution can...it's just part of the metabolism of culture.
Speaking of Judd, Tyler Green is still in
the running for Judd
head of the month, both bits are interesting, especially the bits on why
Smithson was more favored in the academy.
Kim Davenport of Rice University has 10
bits of sound advice regarding installation art. You definitely have to
take a greater leap of faith and trust the atrist more for site specific projects... (more)
Exciting TBA festival visual arts lineup announced
Last night PICA announced their "On Sight" visual arts lineup for
the TBA festival September 5-14. Overall,
a much stronger and more rebellious visual arts lineup than last year (there
were grumbles and bad installs) with a real vis art festival feel than just some appended element
to primarily performance oriented TBA lineup. For the first time since they
canned their year round visual arts exhibition program I'm truly excited. Overall the curatorial
arc has lots of recent Whitney Bi approved names.
Mike
Kelley Day is Done ... Kelley's aesthetic can be found in a lot of the other
artists here. The Yes Men Co-presented
with Pacific Northwest College of Art
Fritz Haeg Co-presented with Reed College... hmmm a rebel gardener in Portland,
frankly I'm most excited about this. Haeg's
talk last year was a highlight. Ryan
Trecartin I-Be Area... seen last year at Igloo
in the Everett Station Lofts. It needed more attention, so good to see again...
a fantastic video artist
Lizzy Fitch Residency / Commission of new work / Installation + Performance... (more)
9 years & last chance for an impressive April gallery junket
April marks my ninth year in Portland and it is really satisfying to say that
this was probably the single best month of shows I've seen since moving here.
What's more there were strong offerings in every genre imaginable.(list of strong shows ending this weekend below).
A lot has changed since 1999, now there really are several scenes not just one... ... (more)
The West Side Railyards Project with pink cultural mystery box (lower right corner)
Nicolai Ouroussoff of the NYT's had an interesting
dissection of developer renderings on Sunday. In this case he was taking it
to Helmut Jahn's renderings of the recently awarded West Side Rail Yards
project in New York. I particularly liked the Ourousoff's "Cultural Mystery"
description where, "neither the developer nor the government have any idea
who would occupy the so-called cultural building." Apparently the developer
Tishman
Speyer has an art collection too... though it isn't like New York needs
another corporate art museum. (mmm and yes HJ and I are cousins) This railyard redevelopment reminds
me
a bit of the South
Waterfront project in Portland, which is actually bigger and more expensive
than this New York Project... though SOWA doesn't even have a cultural mystery
box, though to be fair they do have Linda
K Johnson's AIR residencies. Of the AIR projects I think Horatio Law's "China
on the Willamette" in May is gonna be a real treat because it draws a correlation
between Portland's mega-development which is tiny compared to China's mega-developments
(not that bigger is necessarily better from a human use standpoint).
PNCA has always wanted to buy its current home in the Pearl district, even
before plans were announced to acquire the 511
building. Now the college has announced they plan to acquire the current
building for an undisclosed sum (read about the
details here). I'm guessing it's an undisclosed amount because air rights
are valuable and real-estate valuations are currently in complicated flux. Also,
Brad Cloepfil of Allied Works (the schools master planner and architect of the
511 building) will oversee some light architectural modifications. Needless
to say this positions art
as a major industry for Portland, one of my pet subjects.
Yes, all of this capital campaign activity is great but here are a few suggestions:<br>
Modify the Feldman
Gallery space to make it a more coherent for showing larger scale work (it's
a bit tight and the wainscoting's gotta go), also endow its sometimes
awesome exhibition program with at least 2 million with fully endowed curatorial
position (PSU should do similar
things for its galleries).
Endow department chair positions and have more full time positions with salaries
in line with national standards.
Overall though PNCA has become the most ambitious business/cultural enterprise in the entire state of Oregon... it makes me wonder how many places can claim that their flagship art school sits at such a pole position? Yet this makes sense Portland's high profile employers like Nike, Adidas, Ziba Design, W+K etc... all need a very serious art school.
Cauduro scholarship for PNCA, Portland invests in the future but loses a Warhol
Oregon's single best art collector, Ed Cauduro... and arguably the best eye
north of San Francisco has given PNCA
a 1 million dollar scholarship endowment. When he was active he tended to collect early and presciently
and his collection has included the likes of Warhol, Judd, Schnabel, Terry
Winters, Jasper Johns, Jeff Koons and Basquiat (who even did a portrait
of the elusive collector). Cauduro has given many important works to PAM (like
the Peter
Young etc.) but none of the listed heavy hitters are currently in PAM's
gap-filled collection. Cauduro also owns Short
Stop, John Chamberlain's first crushed car sculpture... something every
art museum on the planet is interested in (Cauduro is 81 and must be slightly
annoyed with the dynamic sets up). In response he's been setting up a lot of
charities, including this incredibly generous scholarship endowment for PNCA.
I've known about this for a while and it's a major benefit for the college and
the art community. PNCA is on a roll with its 511
building, Hallie
Ford gift (FIVE program) and MK
Guth in the 2008 Whitney Biennial.
The Ed Cauduro Fund for Pacific Northwest College of Art of The Oregon Community
Foundation (OCF) will provide up to four $10,000 annual scholarships, beginning
with two scholarships for the 2008-2009 school year and one in each of the following
two years. The endowment will also provide approximately $5,000 annually for
students to use in purchasing art supplies and materials they would otherwise
be unable to afford. Having a scholarship like this helps PNCA compete with
other schools for particularly promising students... many might not realize
this but it is a competitive advantage they have been lacking....(more)
The latest contemporary addition to the Portland
Art Museum, Tom LaDuke's Private Islands (2007), is now on display
on the 4th floor of the Jubitz Center for Contemporary Art, nearby the recent
Tanya
Batura acquisition.
LaDuke has been getting a lot of attention lately from Tyler
Green and other museums and his work first appeared in Portland in PAM's
New In Town exhibition back in 2002. The thing that has always struck me about
LaDuke's work is how there is always a phantom presence... (more)
Last
weekend Nicolai Ouroussoff opined about the rash of preening new condos in New
York. One telltale problem is how the interiors are extremely conventional...
there was a time when ground breaking design actually pushed those who lived
inside to reconsider how they lived (whereas this is just a surface form of avant-garde).
The only project that seems truly inspired is Jean Nouvel's
100 11th ave project which sets up a generous visual rhythm externally that
actually carries into the interior spaces. In contrast to most of these "surface"
projects I've been photographing the Belmont
Lofts building by Holst Architects in Portland a lot lately and it strikes
me that that condo building doesn't turn its back to Belmont street, it is semi-permiable
and urban ... it isn't a barrier, fortress or some status symbol, it's emblematic
of an engaged civic lifestyle and very Portland. Also, the recent Casey
project in Portland is more notable for its platinum LEED rating than its
novel but slightly dull exterior.
Also last week, More Ways to Waste Time did her own art
tour of Portland, and managed to find way more nooks and crannies in the
art scene here than say the New York times has in their frequent stalkings of
Portland. She ate
a lot of stuff too... (more)
Congratulations to Portlander Michael Patterson-Carver who is one of the recipients
of the 2008 Altoids
art prize, he gets 25,000 and a joint show at the New
Museum. Previous recipient Harrell Fletcher was one of the *nominators. The award
is somewhat unique in contemporary art as artists select other artists for the
award, hence the reason the award doesn't have the musty and necrotic smell that
most art world prizes have... that and Altoids sponsors it. Carver is represented
by Small
A where you can see more of his work.
PAM's latest contemporary acquisition: Batura + some guests
Tanya Batura, Sourire en Bois, 2007. Clay and acrylic. 10 in x 17 in x 10 in. Portland Art Museum.
The Portland Art Museum's latest contemporary acquisition, Tanya
Batura's Sourire en Bois is on now display on the 4th floor of the
Jubitz Center for Contemporary Art. The title translates as, "to smile
out of wood." The double entendre is probably intended, but it also references
how the sculpture has a wooden texture where the torso normally would start... (more)
The Portland Art Museum
is host to yet another distinguished guest, in fact it's a work painted in Portland
by our most famous local artist, Marcus Rothkowitz (aka Mark Rothko). The painting is currently
on display in the third floor of the Schnitzer Center for Northwest Art. The ca. 1928 oil painting "Landscape (View of Portland)" was made long before
his signature style of the late 40's and depicts the then new Ross Island Bridge
from Pill Hill, a moody grey sky and Mt Hood. Overall, it is most strongly influenced
by Cezanne... (more)
In what will probably be the biggest Portland art news of 2008, PNCA has announced they have been given the green light to acquire the historic 511 building by the GSA and Department of Education. PORT reported in detail on this last fall (and were the first to recognize the importance of it to the local art world). PNCA is tied to both Portland's hot new design economy (Ziba, Allied Works, W+K etc)and the West Hills money that recently funded PAM's 100,000,000+ expansion and continuing endowment campaign... so yes they can do it. This is a major investment in Portland's future not just an art school realestate opportunity.
What this likely means:
-Big new Brad Cloepfil project in the architect's home town... we were just discussing his Clyfford Still Museum last week. Im about 99.9999999% certain Cloepfil will get the job, he's the campus' master planner. Hell his office even overlooks the 511 building a lil.
-More public galleries on the North Park Blocks giving Portland an opportunity to extend the Park Plocks in the future into a world class cultural enclave.... (more)
Ok, the typical Whitney rigmarole has given New York something to talk about
again (though it seems quieter and less engaging than usual, the Whitney needs
to radically change the show to increase its relevance). Frankly it doesn't
excite me at all, but so far Ben
Davis on Artnet has done the best job of capturing the issue at hand. His
best summary, "the whole thing does seem to represent an interest in homeopathic
medicine! That is, it offers to simulate a negative effect to cure the larger
disease; as if to fend off harsh critical attacks, the show embraces a defensive
self-abasement. It is willfully half-baked." Though his Neo-Hippie tag
isn't quite news...truth be told the last 4 (including 2008) have all been Neo-Hippie
late 60's and early 70's fests. One could point to the adoption of Devendra
Banhart into the art world as making it rather official (and therefore dead).
That nostalgia also underscores why people aren't that whipped up over this
Biennial show, there is no real shift at work here.
Despite that, Portland's own MK Guth is racking up all sorts of critical notice
doing the important thing in any group show, standing out (Davis and the New
York Times single her out as a favorite). Though Holland
Cotter's Times piece labeling of her work as "new agey" seems
like a New Yorker projecting funny expectations on a Portlander. Truth is MK
pisses a lot of Portlanders off because she isn't very dippy-hippy newagey,
she's often hard core but romantic with an eye for entropy and not new agey
at all.... (more)
It's true some worship the WB as some sort of art career Deus ex Machina
while the show's overall importance has waned as of late. Still, some 2-5 artists
seem to emerge from each iteration and artists like David Altmejd, Forcefield,
Chris Johanson and Harrell Fletcher have all gone on to make more serious contributions
after the show. My point is the Whitney B in itself isn't as important as the
follow through after. In many ways Portlanders are simply over being excited
about The Whitney but we love the fact that MK gets to do her thing. I also
keep thinking that a west of the Mississippi Biennial might be in order some
day as well.
Ok, I knew this wasnt going to just die, Portland is just too ambitious and organized. Besides the fair itself was solid, one senses the organizers themselves just ran out of steam for a big side project.
According to Jupiter hotel owners The AFFAIR @ the Jupiter Hotel art fair may not retain the same organizers, name or look, but there is a momentum in the Portland art community for continuing the popular art fair headquartered at the Jupiter Hotel since 2004. According to Jupiter Hotel co-owner Kelsey Bunker, "While it is true that Stuart Horodner and Laurel Gitlen will not be running the AFFAIR @ the Jupiter Hotel, we are excited about the new opportunities this allows us to support the art communities both locally and nationally... (more)
Jasper Johns is one of my all-time favorite artists and unlike Richard Prince
he tells jokes so great they become poetry before they become punchlines (Prince
starts with the punchline and then tries to reverse engineer them). Sadly, Im
not all that convinced by Johns' later work but I consider paintings like "Between
the Clock and the Bed" to be great art. It is a cypher of space and a semipermiable
abstraction... like the sea it doesnt give up its secrets or it's dead. Im not
afraid to utter the dreaded term "great" in the presence of a body
of work like this. In Portland we are intimately acquainted with the color gray
so the Jasper
Johns: Gray show at the Met is of special interest... that and we still
have tons of encaustic
painters here.
Carol Vogel generally leaves me disappointed and her
personal look at Johns is no exception... where is
Kimmelman (the Times chief hagiographer) when you need him?... Europe! Hagiography
has its place (though it isn't a replacement for critique).
White Columns @ Affair at the Jupiter Hotel 2007, Photo by Sarah Henderson
Well, everybody on the inside of the Portland art scene has known for months
that there wasn't going to be an Affair at the Jupiter Hotel Art Fair in 2008. I could have pressed the organizers on this but hoped it might be given over to other hands.
Now
it is officially over.
Most dealers were upset with 2007,
which seemed to be an afterthought compared to 2006 and many key players simply
weren't going to... (more)
Tomorrow (Feb 16th), James
Turrell will speak at PNCA's huge Swigert Commons space to kick off their
Idea Studio talks. Reservations are sold out but a limited # of standing
room only slots will be available, doors open at 3:00 first come first served. Talk
is at 4:00 (reservation holders need to be seated by 3:50 to retain their seats).
While you are at it read PORT's in-depth
review of James Turrell's Pomona College show to prepare.
Also, it's the general opening of the BCAM at LACMA and the New York Times smells
blood. Neither Ouroussoff
nor Roberta
Smith were that impressed and one senses that an unmitigated triumph at
LACMA would have forced New York Museums to step up...(more)
The Mercury has penned a story about Rererato's
zoning problems and looming closure by the city. I notified Sam Adam's office
of this last week (Commissioner Sam show us your your arts muscle? You wanna be Mayor...
as Mayor Vera saved a fake horse on NW 23rd, as Arts Comissioner why not save a good art venue?)... look
something needs to be done. This is the type of scrappy art venue that makes
Portland great and they have been doing good things. Don't let the letter of
the law usurp the intent. As an arts city its hypocritical for the city of Portland
to shut down Rererato. So readers please email: chamberlainj@ci.portland.or.us and let the city know what you think.
*Update: PORT has assurances from Comissioner Sam's office, "We're working on it. Promise."
As Tyler
notes it's definitely LACMA's
Broad Contemporary Art Museum day, and the LA Times piece is an interesting
exercise in revealing the greatness and faults of three of my favorite things
on the West Coast; LACMA's crazy (with its own woolly mammoth engulfing tar
pit) campus , super
collector Eli Broad and critic Christopher Knight. All three are forgivably
contradictory in ways only the truly talented are... (more)
Art and politics link up more often than I find interesting but Artnet's
list of Obama, McCain and Clinton contributors is interesting (though totally
irrelevant to anybody but art geeks). Sure, artists like Cecily Brown and Chuck
Close might support Obama and Matthew Marks might have supported Clinton but
ultimately it says more about the donors than the candidates...(more)
Unimpressive street art creates impressive waste of tax dollars
A portland artist, Ryan
Birkland, has been arrested for putting up guerilla style art on telephone
poles. It seems pretty ridiculous.... how about taking on the meth pushers that ride
the NoPo max lines instead? This could have a chilling effect on street art like Scott Wayne Indiana's horses and this selective enforcement seems poorly defined.
Last but not least there are (solidly sourced *update confirmed) rumors that the Portland Art
Museum has recieved a pledge from Gordon D. Sondland and Katherine J. Durant for a 1 million dollar gift to allow Children 17 and under to visit the museum for free. It is part of a larger endowment campaign to
provide free days for everyone. Mayor Potter may have avoided funding those
free days but the museum is moving forward with results. See, Portland's patrons do write
checks but it is tied to the seriousness and focus of the organization's mission. If you
are just showing your friends in a big warehouse (and if they aren't
very good) don't expect to be entitled to that much. Seriousness + focus = funding.
Important, Robert
Smithson's Spiral Jetty is threatened by an oil development. Check out Tyler
Green's post to contact the people in Utah doing this TODAY before 7:00 PM ET. I went to grad
school in Logan a couple of hundred miles away and as anyone who has ever visited
the site knows the isolation of the place is important. People in Utah often
don't appreciate this and plunk flame spewing oil refineries in some of the
most scenic areas imaginable so this is a very real threat. Hell, I even got Chas
Bowie this show at Chambers a few years ago because I though his photos
of the site were important.
Definitely stay tuned... Ill have PORT's 2008 curatorial roundup posted later today. Also,
yes I'll post the results of PORT's bridge design contest early next week. Sorry
about the backlog, Ive been very busy.
Brian Ferriso checkup: 1 year as director of the Portland Art Museum
PAM's Executive Director Brian Ferriso
This January marks the one year anniversary for the Portland Art Museum's new
director, Brian Ferriso. As arguably holding the most important cultural position in Oregon,
Ferriso's actions have far reaching implications and set expectations both within the
museum and the rest of the state's philanthropic/artistic community. It is time for an annual checkup.
(disclosure: Im VP of the Contemporary Art Council at PAM and PAM is a PORT sponsor)
The Ferriso effect:
For contrast, John Buchannan, Ferriso's predecessor was a successful and aggressive entrepreneurial
promoter (but questionable as a connoisseur), and for years many other organizations
followed his lead, putting hype ahead of content. Lately, Portlanders have
grown tired of the "constant PR" type leaders as purveyors of empty cultural calories.
[*Note to our so-called journalists, coverage should focus on qualifications of leaders and the quality of shows (aka
the only results that matter) not grandiose promises and PR glosses over inferior
programming simply designed to produce attendance.] In fact, the first thing Ferriso did was cool down the board who
wanted to build on the new property PAM had acquired so he could focus on solidifying
the museum's fundamentals like its; endowment, collections and programming tuned
to Portland's needs (more contemporary with a bustling arts scene). He's also
empowered his curators and that's good for deeping PAM's intellectual relevance... (more)
A group called the Atomic
Age Alliance has come forward to save the wonderful Crown
Motel sign. Even the TV
news is tracking the story. Hopefully (if it is saved) it will stay on Interstate...
Director Gavin Shettler in 2005 at the Portland Art Center's then new home in Chinatown
For the two readers that have not heard, Gavin Shettler sent out an email yesterday announcing that the Portland Art Center is closing. D.K. Row wrote an article about it here.
As an artist who showed at the Portland Art Center as they were transitioning from their old space on Belmont to their new space in the Pearl, I was happy that an institution like PAC existed in Portland... (more)
Hadid gets a university museum... so where is Portland's university museum?
Hadid's winning entry for the Broad Art Museum
I'm certain a lot of you already know
Zaha Hadid has won the commission for Eli Broad's art museum at his alma
mater, Michigan State University. It's a gutsy choice and I like its italicized character a lot more
than her Cincinnati
CAC project or any of the other contestants like Coop Himmelb(l)au and Morphosis
etc. Still it seems pretty tame for Hadid, despite the fact it uses lots of
triangular forms (a personal obsession). She also recently completed
this interesting transit project the Hungerburgbahn
(don't you just love German).
It also brings up the issue of university art museum's and Portland is really
underdeveloped in that department. Seattle has the Henry, the University
of Wisconsin Madison has the Chazen (nee Elvejehm), Berkeley Art Museum,
Eccles (Logan Utah), Jordan Schnitzer Museum in Eugene, Hallie Ford Museum in
Salem etc... (more)
and French philosopher Jacques
Rancière on Feb 29th... (he's the art world's favorite rockstar theoretician these days and between these two the college is hitting exemplars of the twin poles in art today, aesthetic experience [Turrell] and the search for new forms of social dynamic theory [Rancière].
"Idea Studios will be an ongoing and portable series of conversations,
lectures and performances on the inner workings of the creative process. The
series will feature internationally acclaimed practitioners from a range of
fields and cultures as part of a broader PNCA + FIVE effort to highlight the
importance of creativity in fostering innovation and civic imagination. Venues
for Idea Studios will at times shift from the PNCA Portland campus to other
locales across Oregon, the U.S. and the globe...(more)
Randy Gragg and I have a long history but his history with the city of Portland's
aesthetics goes back much farther than that. Though he wasn't the first to write
about me here, he was the first to pen a review on a show I put together way back in 2001. I remember he asked me, "so who is the ringleader?" My half-idiotic
response was, "I suppose that would be me?" Undoubtedly he thought
I was a yutz but wrote the review anyway (bet he wishes he could have that one
back eh?). Still, some of the art was good and that's all he cared about. Now after
leaving the Oregonian Gragg's the ring leader of the brand new Portland
Spaces magazine a kind of Dwell magazine for Portland. Fist Gragg was an
art critic, then an architecture critic and now he's an editor in a city that
is rapidly reimagining itself. If there was ever a time for such a thing it's
now.
Sure Gragg's departure from the O did prompt some major civic leaders to query
if the O will just abdicate architectural and design criticism altogether but
I suspect they will need to do something to compete with Portland Spaces for
relevance sake. Though Randy and I don't always see eye to eye (mostly because
we differ on important minutiae) I've always respected the guy and like the
fact we offer eachother the opportunity to disagree (critics live for this).
Also, Randy has an excellent nose for news and always seems to know where the
action is... which makes his new Portland Spaces magazine tantalizing.
The inaugural issue of the bimonthly has an interesting modern home by rising
architect Jeff Kovel built for Karen and John Hoke (Nike VP) on the cover...(more)
Eli
Broad's big news in the New York Times yesterday still has everybody
talking. Is forming an independent art lending institution a form of Teddy
Roosevelt style cultural trust-busting (museum as monopolizer) or does it short circuit the opportunities
and dialog of the works joining a larger collection? For example, curators build
museum collections around acquisitions, not available loans. Also, loans aren't
likely to become museum favorites that people can visit for 10+ year stretches
of time (my favorite part of museum going). Still LACMA's
new Broad building will have a strong presence of Broad Art Foundation loans.
Interestingly enough, Portland has a stake in this story as Broad has been
very active with the Portland
Art Museum and by not giving the collection wholesale to LACMA it leaves
the door open for further engagement with Portland's art starved but rapidly
developing cultural ecosystem. Portland has been the beneficiary of the Broad
Foundation quite regularly including the Damien
Hirst and Camouflage
shows at the Portland Art Museum in 2007. Sure we have some good collectors
in the Northwest but no collection North of California on the West Coast can
compete with Broad's, it really helps as a resource.
By creating a lending institution and not mothballing... (more)
DAVID LYNCH IN DIRECTOR blackANDwhite'S LYNCH. COURTESY ABSURDA.
JAN 4, 5, 6 FRI 7 PM, SAT 7 PM, SUN 5:30 PM
LYNCH
US/DENMARK 2007
DIRECTOR: BLACKANDWHITE
This fascinating, indeed "Lynchian," portrait offers a rare glimpse into the enigmatic mind and creative process of the famed director of ERASERHEAD, THE ELEPHANT MAN, BLUE VELVET, and MULHOLLAND DRIVE, to name just a few of his surreal and seminal works. Filmed over a period of two years (by mysterious producers) it follows David Lynch at home and at work on the set of his recent INLAND EMPIRE with Laura Dern and Jeremy Irons... (more)
It's done now but 2007 was a big year and here is how PORT's Ryan Pierce, ex-PORTer
and new Beaverton Arts Comission board member Melia Donovan, Matt McCormick, Micah Malone, Jesse
Hayward and my own dull self rated the year... (more)
PORT and Portland's art scene had a particularly good year in 2007 with a general
expansion of interesting new venues, artists and greater national exposure all around.
In fact, weve had so much exposure outside of the city that Portlander's have
begun to refer the national media as stalkers. Even PORT
ended up in Art in America.
PORT Scoops.. here are just some major stories where we were the first
Portland publication to break the news:
PNCA
makes it's bid for the 511 building, possibly the most important growth
opportunity for art in Portland in the past 60 years. Other media have been
playing catch up to what could be the biggest story of 2008 as well.
Portland Art Museum acquired several nice contemporary objects including a
fine Judy
Chicago and a really nice Gene
Davis (we were the only Portland publication to mention these... but then
again we are focused purely on art... so there you have it)
Here are some of my favorite articles from the past year:... (more)
Most of PORT's staff have the week off so posts will be somewhat sporadic,
so here are some things to yule-tide you over (I know, I know, both the pagans
and the baby Jesus would disapprove of that pun):
Yesterday Roberta
Smith took a shot at the word "Practice" as over-used by contemporary
artists in 2007. I'm with her on this one, one has to have a receptionist
and a lobby to have a practice... maybe it's all the college loans that drive
artists to consider it a practice? It's probably just a nonsensical shortening
of the term studio practice that gets all frothy with other pretensions (most
artists are not particularly good wordsmiths so it is Roberta's job to point this
sort of silliness out). It all reminds me of the original ending of Robert Hughes
The
Shock Of The New where he complained that art had become a vocation not
an avocation... later Hughes wussed out and changed that ending. Still, he had
it right the first time, even if he was wrong as could be about Basquiat (right
about Schnabel though). My greatest annoyance is with the art world's meaningless
use of the word "Authentic." To me its like the yuppie approved packaging
on overpriced ethnic dishes one can find at high end grocery stores. It almost
guarantees it isn't the real thing but it's overpriced status intends to mitigate
guilt while giving it a patina of legitimacy. To use Greenberg's term it's very
middlebrow.
Art Info has a
nice interview with Joel Shapiro, whose work seems to becoming increasingly
relevant and central to the age old (some would say pointless) distinction between
representation and abstraction in sculpture. I love how his later work seems
to activate space through inhabitation. This has always been a key element of
his work but in the last few years he's developed that Picasso-like sureness
and energy about his efforts. I like it much better than David Smith's Cubi
series which I feel were a bit forced (though important). There is nothing
forced about this work, Shapiro is the new Giacometti (as our leading existential
sculptor).
The New
York Times had a bit on starchitects... Is it just me or are the architects
today way more progressive and experimental than the artists? Theoretically,
artists aren't saddled with the same kinds of compromises and restrictions...
so why does someone like Julie
Mehretu seem like a side dish compared to the main courses in Gehry, Koolhaas,
Hadid, HdM
and Libeskind's
work?
So how was Gallery Homeland's A
NW Thang opening at the Ford Building on Friday night? Maybe the more important
question is how was the art?
Answer: pretty solid.
Sure, spatially it was a ramble of large finished hallway spaces and an enormous
unfinished commercial space but the art itself was what I've been hoping for
over the last few years when I've gone to locally focused upstart institutional
shows. Most everything I saw was well done, post MFA quality work. Of particular
note was Cynthia Starr's group project where an entire human cadaver was created
out of knit elements, guts and all. Yes, it's absolutely stereotypical of Portland
and our surplus of knitters (and group activities) but it had an intellectual
reflexiveness I often don't see in other group projects which seem to invite
a lot of participants so a large crowd will show up. Karl Lind's video selections
were... (more)
Overall, the art production for Miami 2007 seemed less fresh and daring than I remember it in 2005 (going to Miami every year isn't necessary) and maybe the art world is too sated. So why not ask... was 2007 in general a lackluster vintage or is it just a fair problem? Also, Jen Graves (who sat this one out) had a good "just that facts" take on Miami
this year from a Seattle perspective. Portland galleries mostly avoided
Aqua and did ok to great this year. Also, after talking to a few Portland gallerists the fairs most of them want to be in are Pulse
or Art Miami.
Overall, Art fair experiences really vary, for example Pulliam Deffenbaugh was at the
somewhat lackluster Red Dot fair and yet did really well so it's difficult to
characterize. The Aquas have some really good elements but need to up the ante
the way Pulse and Nada have since theyve first appeared. Schwanky events, more
diverse galleries and something that differentiates and makes the fair a destination.
Portland's own Affair
at the Jupiter Hotel needs to do the same things just to bring people to
Portland. Which brings us to the question, will there be another affair?...
OK I know more than Ill discuss here but many Portland dealers really want them
to step up and make the event more of a destination or have a completely different
fair under different management. Pairing with TBA doesn't really work, two different
crowds. If it were paired with a vis-arts festival that would be more effective.
a Motel installtion from July 2005
On the news of Motel's
closing last week... Im sad of course, but this wasn't a surprise for me
as Jenn and I have a rapport (As PORT's co-founder and former buisiness partner
she's like the sister I never had). She wanted to concentrate purely on the
gallery when her planned exodus from PORT happened earlier this year (in the
works for about a year actually). There are some things Portland needs to learn from this... (more)
DK Row continues to expound upon his seriously
flawed understanding of non profits and Portland's current situation and this
time out he's heckling Gallery Homeland. In a city where arts patronage
is underdeveloped it takes an armada of small scrappy, completely underfunded
institutions to lay the difficult groundwork for better patronage. It isn't about the money stupid,
it's making headway in the education department. Spaces don't educate, personalities
dont educate, fundraising tallies dont educate... the only thing that educates
is doing good shows for over 3 years (which is the minimum amount of time it
takes to develop a true track record). So with all due respect, give Gallery
Homeland a break from the hackneyed misdirected analysis and pay attention to
the critical worth of their efforts, that is the measure that matters (and part
of why Row's coverage is hurting the development of a better patronage base).
Also, Row's desire for one institution to be "the place" is totally
misguided and too convenient. Portland is too busy an art city to have one central
hub, you only get that in smaller scenes or when giant city governments undertake
something like Yerba Buena. Portland's government and patrons just aren't there
yet, it's still in the hands of scrappy individuals and volunteers. It's actually
a good thing and more interesting than having everyone suck up to 5-10 extremely
wealthy patrons with dubious taste. It's actually a magic moment of art organization
experimentation in Portland. David, your fundamental assumptions are seriously
flawed, smaller more specialized institutions dont seek to dominate, this isnt
sports (want to duke it out in a game of ping pong, tennis or dodgeball, Ill
whup yer ass there too). Personally, I'd rather see 10 150k a year art organizations
than one stale bureaucracy with a budget of 1.5 million... so to that end I
suggest everyone go out and see what Paul and Gallery
Homeland can do at their opening on Dec 14.
Portland's art scene will be well represented during this
week's Miami Art Fair madness with greater visibility than ever before. Portland
galleries and artists are seeminly everwhere this time. Sure, Portland artists,
curators and galleries are already veterans of such fairs but after years being
stalked by the media in the New
York Times, Wall
Street Journal, CNN, Art Forum, Modern Painters and Art
in America etc. it now seems Portland has buzz for being different and it shows
in the art. In fact, art is central to Portland, no other large metropolitan West
Coast city can claim that... (more)
Tyler
Green has been playing a parlor game centered around reimagining MoMA's galleries.
My take is that Americans pretty much needed Alfred Barr to simplify the polyglot
that was avant-garde art for Yankee consumption. Barr's brilliant solution
was Picasso and since he had helped MoMA to acquire Les Demoiselles d' Avignon
the museum was in a good position to make that case. Following curators like
Rubin and Varnadoe picked a different hero artist to key the installation to; Jackson Pollock. The thing
is I believe Americans are now ready for a more complex worldview and MoMA needs to
accept that challenge to avoid becoming not only just a museum of 20th century
art but a museum of 20th century ideology. Personally I agree that Pollock is
a lynch pin argument but I also agree with Tyler that by foregrounding another
giant like Clyfford Still and lesser lights like John McLaughlin it could really
shake things up. Hell, I'd throw in an Andrew Wyeth and lots of H.C.
Westerman's just to flay the monogenic discussion away from just one artist. Westerman
isn't talked about enough, he's actually way more influential than is typically
recognized. I'm all for an allout assault on monogenic thought in America... (more)
The print media in Portland is finally starting to catch up with PORT on the very
exciting 511 building project for PNCA. Here's our initial take, and a tiny
bit from the
O this past Saturday (they've lost a lot by not having full-time architecture
columnist like Randy Gragg). To reiterate, the 511 project effectively creates a high profile arts
boulevard on Portland's North Park blocks (consolidating gains with the Desoto
Building and the Everett
Station Lofts) and if the Post Office moves out by the airport as expected
the additional 13 acres could be developed into an urban cultural boulevard...
a little bit like the Benjamin
Franklin Parkway but with the park blocks instead of the old imperial style.
Also, Brad Cloepfil did the campus' master plan and would almost certainly be
the top choice as architect for this building. Net result, a world-class art
institution effort in the Pearl District. I was at the PDC meeting (there was really no contest between the market and PNCA, the Federal Government controls the building
not PDC and thus only PNCA qualifies to apply). Hopefully, the GSA will see the wisdom
in giving PNCA the building and Portland a boost... let's just say PNCA is pulling out all the stops,
they really want this and it's the biggest news for Portland's cultural
community since I've lived here (8.5 years).
UPDATE* DK Row has chimed in as well now with a pleasantly matter of fact piece... the recent vacation must have quelled his typical need for snark, or maybe it's because this is such an important issue. Still this article doesnt really convey how this is a potentially paradigm changing opportunity.
Nouvel's proposed tower next to MoMA
Jean
Nouvel is designing a new tower next to MoMA. Actually, it will give a much
needed expansion to MoMA's exhibition space by devoting 3 floors to the museum.
This question from the Times' Ouroussoff is key, "Yet the building raises
a question: How did a profit-driven developer become more adventurous architecturally
than MoMA, which has tended to make cautious choices in recent years?"
I consider it an opportunity for MoMA to "grow a pair", so to speak
so please don't let Taniguchi design the galleries?$@! We live in a pluralistic age and
MoMA needs an architecturally pluralistic campus. Don't even get me started abouthow lame this other new york project is.
Last but not least Jerry Saltz is asking important questions about MoMA's lack of female artists. The Portland Art Museum actually does a good job of this currently highlighting Lee Krasner, Judy Chicago, Agnes Martin, Helen Frankenthaler, Lynda Benglis, Hilla Von Rebay, Dorothea Rockburn, Anne Truitt, Kiki Smith and Suen Wong, etc. For once PAM can claim bragging rights over MoMA (and it's something MoMA can easilly correct). Also, when will MoMA do a long overdue Benglis retro? Needless to say balls aren't everything...
My general reaction to this list is it's... solid, somewhat conservative (except for Clifford whom I was rooting for as an underdog) and very Northwest art-ish (aka lots of wood, craft, animals and tree references). For context, more agressively contemporary and less regionally placeable artists like Alex Schweder, Sean Healy, Jack Daws and Chandra Bocci (list goes on forever) were not of the 28 finalists from which these 5 were chosen so this list isn't really a surprise and curator Jennifer Gately has a very tricky balancing act to do. Her statement that she decided on, "works that resonate on distinctively regional yet universal levels," explains things rather well... to me that means a show which big time donor/collectors can be both challenged by and yet find familiar. A completely respectable list, but not bleeding edge... (more)
On Artnet, Hunter
Drohojowska-Philp has taken on the Murkami show at MOCA with lots of nice
pictures. I'm a big fan but it is odd how Ive seen most of this work in other
places (I first saw My
Lonesome Cowboy and Hiropon at The Portland Art Museum in 2000 even). Murakami
still matters but somehow I wanted him to do something more radical than a museum
show, maybe something in a mall instead of moving the mall into the museum?
My favorites will always be the Francis
Bacon works, DOB inflatables, toothed mushroom paintings and the wallpapers.
Establishing an anti-establishment, comparing Rinder and Hickey
So far, the two most influential art shows of the 21st century have been the2002 Whitney Biennial curated by Larry Rinder and Beau Monde: towards a redeemed cosmopolitianism curated by Dave Hickey in 2001. The art-insider-unpopular WB was a fetished kind of amatuerism that was quickly co-opted by the arts system as a style (yet ironically got Rinder exiled), whereas conversely Beau Monde was simply too perfect as an ideal, hyper intelligent yet entertaining art show that sported grafitti art and foregrounded experience (most of the art was also big ticket). Together they signified the death knell of postmodernism (which was all about disassociation and alienation) and the reassertion of both craft and street culture as more important than the academy.
Yet, it is funny how both Hickey and Rinder are anti-establishment and yet so firmly of it. Though considering the fact that Rinder is now a Dean at CCA is more of a true institutionalist, whereas Hickey seems to enjoy the material for writing that the paradox generates. Rinder has a former CCA student show at Liz Leach right now and Hickey has a similar but bigger production show about his UNLV days at the LVAM. At one time they seemed like polar opposites but now they seem like omnipresent sides of the same coin. For example, Paul Schimmel's Ecstacy show at MOCA seemed like a followup to both Beau Monde and the 2002 Whitney Bi.
Now, there is more from Hickey and Rinder as they look back:
Director Gavin Shettler in 2005 at the Portland Art Center's then new home in Chinatown
The Portland Art Center has been attempting to fill an important role in the Portland arts community over the past five years, as a non-profit supporting the development of young artists while bridging the worlds of galleries, museums, and educational institutions. Now they're looking back to the community for support to cover a $40,000 budget shortfall.
Although PAC has achieved some success with grants (a $50,000 grant from the Meyer Memorial Trust and $25,000 from the Lehmann Foundation) they have been unable to meet their sustaining private fund raising goals in Portland's difficult philanthropic environment.
They're currently inhabiting an ambitious 10,000 square foot space, but the rent, although below market value, has become a heavy financial burden at $5,000 per month. As the Goldsmith building's lead tenant, it creates market pressures for developer David Gold and his bank, requiring PAC to scale up financially. PAC currently needs to raise $27,000 for back rent and $13,000 to cover salaries for its two staff members by December 1st. That isn't a lot of money considering the Portland Art Museum raised 40 million dollars back in 2005, but those people have been completely absent as major patrons ($2,000+) for PAC. Shettler describes the situation as, "at a critical point."
Here's an interesting article about Wilhelm
Schurmann on Art Facts (Salvatore Reda pointed it out to me). In particular
I like how Schurmann confounds those who try to categorize his activities and
it reminds me of all those shortsighted people who seem to complain about how
disciplines like curator, artist, collector, critic, historian, gallerist, philanthropists
or board member are blurred together. We live in a true era of pluralism
so all of this boundary blurring shouldn't come as...(more)
Clearly the Pacific Northwest
College of Art is very interested in the property as they currently rent
their space, which does nothing for their financial stability. Being denied
the opportunity to build equity they are subjected to the market forces of condo
development in the Pearl and the situation needs to be addressed soon...(more)
Finally, an art magazine has addressed the varied world of art blogging and PORT was lucky enough to be included in a wide-ranging roundatable discussion put together by Peter Plagens. Besides myself, the cogent voices of gallerist Edward Winkleman, Seattle PI critic Regina Hackett, Libby Rosof and Roberta Fallon of Philly as well as that art blogging machine Tyler Green are present (who once again had the scoop). It is a great article and I'm pretty proud of everyone involved as it presents a whole new world of cultural coverage to some who might not already be aware. I think it also dispells a lot of myths and persues the potential of the format. Most of the panelists seemed to go out of their way to point out other worthy sites as well... (more)
Robert Irwin's Primaries and Secondaries in San Diego
Robert Irwin's Primaries
and Secondaries retrospective, which opened yesterday at the San Diego Museum
of Contemporary Art may very well be the best show of 2007. More substance
than flash, each of the mature works is a pragmatically transcendent experience
and everything is nearly perfectly installed, he did after all have something to
do with the development of the spaces he's using. Instead of the problems even a successful retrospective
often produces, it seems as if no aesthetic and ideological compromises were made and no museum hype or baggage been put in front of the art. In fact, part of the reason Irwin is so good is because his work is not merely being accommodated by MCASD. Instead, he has developed an ethical, aesthetic, philosophical and spatial rapport with the institution. This connection spans decades and it makes both he and the institution look better. It also underscores how radical Irwin is... institutions don't merely take his work into account, they evolve to establish a more meaningful sonority, which is completely different than focusing on ticket sales.
Arcy Douglass will have an in depth review of the show shortly, till then enjoy these images: ...(more)
Frankly, such a generous gift is the only way such a painting by van Gogh could
enter the museum's collection and it's worth many millions (in today's market
5-10 is my conservative guess, but that's rational thinking, at auction it maybe
could have hit approached 15 or more). The Rijksmuseum has the other version
of this work, which features a red ox instead of the black one here. Basically the money doesn't matter, it is the fact that its an important piece for the premier public collection in the state... (more)
Jerry Saltz is the kind of critic who cares about his art scene, he doesn't
just exploit it and his latest piece on the
health of New York's scene is an interesting read. He doesn't just present
the situation as pure doom though, he points out some bright spots and simply seems tired of the lack of radical
ideas.... hardly a problem exclusive to New York. The piece also seems to wish
for many of the things that Portland has (yet the Oregonian's coverage is a
tad over obsessed with our liberating lack of money without pointing out its benefits... there is a middle ground of course). No New York's scene isn't
dead and no Portland isn't the center of the universe but there are lessons
to be learned from both. The secret is simply how to be fresh or even innovative,
then get the credit for it? The words are so simple but the task is daunting.
Proposed pedestrian and light rail bridge as designed by ZGF
Also, what does everyone think of the ZGF design proposal for a
new bridge over the Willamette that was in the Oregonian a bit ago? I think
it is a decent design but top heavy, slightly unoriginal and a little inelegant,
besides the nearby Marquam Bridge is a terrible design and the
reason the Fremont Bridge is so good. The Marquam's bad design almost begs
for something so good that that it is rendered invisible. Besides is "decent"
really good enough for something that bridges OMSI with the South Waterfront
and the
Aerial Tram?... we have a design reputation to uphold and there needs to be a serious design competition. Why not invite
Calatrava, Denton
Corker Marshall, shop,
and maybe Norman Foster to take a shot at this? Besides we have one of the best
bridge collections in the the world, but it needs the highest quality addition. This just doesn't cut it.
Overall, the list is heavy with perceptual experience artists like Ehlis, Jackson,
Fritz, McFarland and Diehl. While Renwick and Slappe tend to create narrative
tableaus with their video installation work. McCormick, Ennis and Lommasson
are more traditional to their medias which are painting, drawing and photography
respectively. Norris, McCormick and Lommasson are represented by NAAU but if
this
last year'sgroup
shows and this list are any indication, the gallery wont look anything like
a sales gallery.
Now all that matters is how the actual shows deliver.
*Update:The
Oregonian has published their digestion of the decisions and I'll refrain
from discussing too many of their factual distortions but one has to be challenged...
Renwick, Lommasson, Fritz and Ehlis are hardly the greenhorns David Row portrays
them as. When Row states...(more)
Just a remider to everyone, it's the last weekend for Wes Mills' Apex show at PAM. Here is Arcy's excellent review. A subtle show but one of the most rewarding exhibitions Ive seen since moving here 8.5 years ago...you just shouldn't miss it. It even plays well with the Ursula von Rydingsvard show.
Yeah, there is a new Chuck Close print show at PAM too that I'm not very excited about.... he was Mr. early 90's and by that time was pretty much coasting on a reputation he had cemented in the late 70's. Still, if you are there why not see it too?
On
The Cusp (from Indianapolis) gives Portland some feedback regardig my
follow-up post regarding the Tribune's big arts special section last week.
Yes, scene-wise I think OTC is right about us being ahead but Midwestern cities
always seem to have better museums and more established non-profits. I'm glad
he picked up on my "focus" argument it is crucial. I hope it catches
on here more.... (more)
Las Vegas Diaspora & Dave Hickey's Homecoming Dance
work by Jacqueline Ehlis on view @ Las Vegas Diaspora
This past weekend, Las
Vegas Diaspora: The Emergence of Contemporary Art from the Neon Homeland
opened at the Las
Vegas Art Museum. Curated by Dave
Hickey. It is pretty much the first show he's curated since the groundbreaking
Beau
Monde: Towards a Redeemed Cosmopolitanism Site Santa Fe Biennial in 2001
and a follow-up on some of his top students like Yek, Tim Bavington, Rev Ethan
Acres, Curtis Fairman and Portland's own Jacqueline
Ehlis. All of whom are personal favs and many of whom Ive curated into shows
over the years. Ehlis is one of the few girls in a guy heavy group and may be
the Agnes Martin ascetic wth a wierd almost Martha Graham physicality of the group. She routinely does work that makes LA's
best related attempts look soft (she's up at 5:00 AM in the studio). Bavington and Philip
Argent are in MOMA's collection., Acres, Yek and Fairman etc. have been widely
shown.
Hickey's students are only part of his legacy. Beau Monde's basic premise was
that visual pleasure (and the viewer's experience) was still important to art, DUH... but
back then POMO theorists had their heads so far up their council-of-trent-like
asses, somebody had to remind them. Hickey's ideas though widely debated at the
time have been pretty much adopted and run with by in shows like, Paul Schimmel's
Ecstacy show at MOCA, Olafur
Eliasson at the Tate...(more)
Also, it isn't news that right now we are institutionally underdeveloped
while having a massive influx of serious talent that has continued unabated
for at least 10 years. The deluge has even increased and others
have noticed. I like it that the author Joseph Gallivan compared Portland
to Leipzig. One thing I've noticed is that people now seem to know the money
to do serious things exists here but hasn't been fully marshaled yet. I also
like how the artists take the burden of educating collectors and donors on as
well. A city built by artists (some world-class) rather than a few patrons simply
importing culture is a very special thing...(more)
Sadly last weekend the studio
of noted Portland painter Michael Brophy burned. Katu
news has the story and blog
sans artifice has more details and pictures. Michael is too nice a guy to have
such terrible luck and another artist Michael Wilson was also affected by this terrible fire. Brophy was to have had 2 consecutive solo shows in December and January at Laura Russo Gallery and according to Vanessa Renwick at least some of the paintings survived. The new works were often radically different than his previous work and were some of the strongest he done to date. If any are destroyed (which seems likely) it will be a terrible loss.
We hope everyone's health and work were spared. Michael and Holly are said to be ok but shaken and staying with relatives. Brophy's studio itself was probably spared the flames but the real question is water damage as the space above was innundated first (oil paintings can survive deluge but there's all the falling debris). One cat survived and two others are presumed dead. Long time friend Paul Green described the scene as "horrible." I'll post more details as they develop, including where people can send their support and well wishes. Our thoughts are with everyone during this difficult time.
*Updates: I took at look at the site yesterday and the damage is pretty extensive and certaily a lot of ireplacable things have been lost. It is eerie how it looks like one of Mike's paintings, which have all been transferred elsewhere to assess their condition and for safer storage. Another cat has turned up so only 1 remains missing and Holly's computer, according to Randy Gragg is, "being dried out professionally." If it is just water damage a lot of the hard drive's contents should be recoverable (let's hope). A tax deductable fund through RACC has been set up to defray some of the rebuiding costs as insurance probably won't completely cover the costs.
Checks should be made payable to:
Regional Arts & Culture Council
Memo: for Michael Brophy studio rebuilding fund
108 NW 9th Avenue, Suite 300
Portland, OR 97209-3318
For example, Jonathan Jones takes a gander at Matthew
Barney and decides he is no Damien Hirst in The Guardian. I agree with that.
Barney's objects are definitely props and don't hold up as well as the films....
and the films themselves are a bit like Salvador Dali's late work...(more)
White Columns @ Affair at the Jupiter Hotel 2007, Photo by Sarah Henderson
Well the big Portland vis art weekend has come and gone. Though it needed
a name (Critical Mass, Too Much Art etc.) the scene was combination of The
Affair at the Jupiter Art Fair, last weekend of Rembrandt at PAM, Ursula
von Rydingsvard at PAM, last weekend of PICA's TBA visual arts, a bunch of openings,
last weekend of Hap Tivey and a confluence of lot of other shows that are up
all month.
Suggestions for art visitors to Portland this weekend
Obligatory photo of Portland Building
Yes, there are lots of out of towners in Portland's galleries this this week
and there will probably be many more by Friday. We even have Jetblue service
so why not visit on a whim? In keeping with that theme some have asked for a Portland art guide so here it is:
There have been a ton of Ferriso interviews here in the last 8 months and PORT will probably do a formal sit-down with him and maybe some senior
staff in the future but we really want things to be settled in more before we
ask those nitty gritty and probably unique to Portland questions. I can say
I know literally hundreds of people who have worked with him in Milwaukee and
Portland and it is almost unanimously enthusiastic about his thoughtful dedication
to the important role of museums. In short Portland has almost Roman civics and Ferriso seems to fit right in here. Museums should lead and challenge not pander to some statistical lowest common denominator audience. That strategy ultimately cheats everyone, while looking great on paper.
It looks like San
Francisco is questioning John Buchanan in the same way we Portlander's were
for years before
he left. The problem is that museum directors shouldn't be preempting their
curators, they are two very different jobs and from our experience in Portland
most would say that John was very hand's on. To quote the late Gordon Gilkey
a curator who predated but passed away before Buchanan's term finished at PAM,
"he's a damn micromanager." I like the idea of Gordon having the last
word.
Tyler
Green has been all over this and I remember our first phone conversation
about John distinctly... let's just say everything I mentioned about JB's style
has come to pass. It is no secret that the serious contemporary art community in Portland really had
a bone to pick with him. Still to John's credit he did create the current Rembrandt
show (which isn't fluff at all), the transformative Greenberg Collection aquisition,
and allowed the Miller-Meigs series of contemporaty shows at PAM to happen. Maybe John can turn it around?
Still, it is a fact... by the time he had left for San Francisco Portland had outgrown him.
Up at the PAMtation: Portland Art Museum continues to redirect itself
The Portland Art Museum has
leaked a smidgen of their major programming for the coming years but the best stuff isn't on the list. There are lots
of gaps and omissions, including a major contemporary retrospective (it is too
early to be discussed yet, curated by Bruce Guenther)... so calling this lineup
a more "regional"
focus as the O does misses the mark. Especially considering recent
acquisitions they failed to note and the lineup for the ongoing Miller-Meigs
series which are not listed (other question is why does the O seem to want PAM to
become so regional or isolationist?). Don't worry that isn't happening, the museum is easilly becoming more internationally relevant, while still being more serious about addressing the regional.
*Update here's a quote from Ferriso: "Our goal in developing this series has been to harness the intellectual and physical assets of the Museum and community to stimulate interest and dialogue around key global issues: past, present, and future. ....This series includes large-scale international exhibitions, some conceived at other institutions, but the majority developed through the scholarship of our own curators."
The Guardian
talks to Rem Koolhaas who is suddenly getting all nostalgic for older housing
options... interesting, it sounds very Portlandish. We like our neighborhoods
but are also starting to add some interesting architecture like the Aerial
Tram. Still it is the interesting residential projects like the Lair
Condominiums that are also proving to be very compelling here. We aren't
reinventing Brasilia,
LA or Manhattan in Portland. New projects by Skylab
could further demonstrate how Portland can have the best of both worlds, vibrant
non-homogenized neighborhoods and interesting design. Um... and how about Calatrava
doing the new
pedestrian, bicycle and light rail bridge across the Willamette river?
Koolhaas provides somewhat of an example for Portland, which has to own it's contradictions without resolving them in a tidy way.
On Artnet Ben Davis dives headlong into the
question of whether the art market(s) need a new form or forms of critique. I agree the Marxist critique does seem terribly inadequate. Art markets are places where contradictions find consummations. I suspect the high prices of key AbEx artists wont fall much even if there is a correction... they are too historically important, rare and central to understanding America to be effected much. Living artists selling for millions will have a different story.
Brittany Powell went art
camping last weekend. Portland isn't like New York or LA, when we reference
the woods and camping it's more legitimate we are litterally 30 minutes from
jaw-dropping wilderness landscapes.
Brian Libby asks SoWhat?
when he visits the new John Ross tower. Libby continues to win cool-points
for conflating JR Ewing with architecture (we gotta be about the same age, some
22 year old is not gonna get why Larry Hackman matters.
Jason Rhoades' Twelve-Wheel Waggon Wheel Chandelier (2004)
After several days in LA and San Francisco I'm blogging from beautiful Ashland
Oregon on my way back to Portland, where I will be installing this
show in the Pearl District.
It was a trip evenly split between art and architecture, including Neutra (ugh
did Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher put that monstrosity up next to the Lovell
Health House?). I also saw great examples by Koolhaas, Mayne, Gehry, Frank Lloyd Wright, Herzog & de Meuron etc.
The must see shows are... (more)
Todd Gibson, who is sitting in for Tyler Green has chimed in on
the inevitable art market correction. I agree Doig as a living artist is
not worth 11 million and may not even be worth that much 30 years from now but
it's quite possible the 72 million dollar Rothko won't lose that much value. It may have been the ridiculously high prices that made that painting available
on the market in the first place. Sadly 72M is clearly out of range for the
Portland Art Museum, yet as the first place to give Rothko a solo show (and
the city where he grew up) it's a shame.. maybe someone will want a 60 million
dollar tax write-off?
How a correction might effect younger artsts who sell for reasonable amounts
between 5-$50,000 remains yet to be seen. There isn't one art market now, there
are several and I suspect the new popularity of art has created a legion of
new collectors who will continue to collect even if they have less $$$ to collect.
That would translate to a weeding out of galleries in New York and a shrinking
of art fairs at Art Basel Miami Beach... but I don't think it will collapse
the sane parts of the market. In fact it might support it. Portland's art economy
isn't driven by hedge funds either, it is real estate, the fact that we don't
have sales tax and old fashioned interested in art for rts sake collectors. If collectors get scared of manipulated
markets Portland will look more attractive as a more genuine art ecosystem too.
Sure a large scale correction hurts most everybody but it wont be fatal for
Portland. Christies and Sotheby's might have some rough seas ahead though.
Developers & Art: what about an Amenity Bonus Program?
Add Brian Wannamaker to the list of Portland developers who add to the art
community here, and now the Tribune has covered his new
Falcon Art Community project.
The list of conscientious players here is long and very important; Al Solheim,
Jim Winkler, Ken
Unkeles, Brad Malsin, Randy
Rapaport, David Gold and a while back Homer Williams was involved in the
Pearl Arts Foundation, which brought us the Kenny Scharf Tiki totems and William
Wegman dog bowl. These developers are partially why Portland is so unlike San
Diego and Phoenix. Still, I believe it is essential that the city find a way
to further incentivise development of live/work and exhibition spaces.
Ive mentioned this many times before but in Vancouver
BC the CAG (Contemporary Art Gallery) found a new home beneath a new condo
tower because the developer received allowances for incorporating that crucial
nonprofit as the anchor tenant (using VBC's
Amenity Bonus Program). It's the difference between a Starbucks and serious
exhibition spaces... (more)
In case you missed it in the NYT's Roberta Smith took on the long overlooked
Peter
Young who has a show at PS.1. It seems fitting that with all the focus on
psychedelia after Dave Hickey's Site Santa Fe show & the 2002 Whitney Biennial that some artists from the 60's
and 70's might get a revival. Yayoi Kusama has already gone through the roof
as have Jessica Steincamp, Chris Johanson, Karin Davie, Tim Bavington and Katarina
Grosse. There is a younger group of artists like Takeshi
Murata and Portlander Shawna
Ferreira too. The Portland Art Museum even has an excellent Peter Young on display (fittingly in the big Greenberg room). The painting was given by the exceedingly sharp-eyed Ed Cauduro... the quality of his Warhols,
Basquiats, Schnabels, Christopher Wools etc. establish him as the sharpest eyed
collector in the Pacific Northwest. He even collected John Chamberlain's first
crushed car sculpture, "Short Stop."
For something less sarcastic... the
Guardian interviews Oscar Niermeyer. Though with all the gushing over Castro and the fawning over Brasilia's exceptional architecture (while avoiding its exceptionally iffy civic design) maybe some serious sarcasm is warranted. It's the sort of power meets buildings problem that often gets architects into trouble with historians and the people who have to live in their creations.
Regina Hackett is discussing animals
in Northwest art. Nothing sarcstic there, animals have been a big deal in the art world since the 90's.
Schama's other programs have been a mixed bag; Van Gogh was a sad dry run for
a made for TV movie and Picasso was a boring basic art historical regurgitation
but his episode on Bernini was brilliant. His episodes on Rembrandt, Turner
and David all offered great scenery and compelling stories that I found inspiring
despite the requisite dramatizations.
Rothko is a fitting end to the series
and I have no idea whether the program will acknowledge that Rothko grew up
in Portland. The effect of Portland's dramatic skies on his sense of color and
use of grey are pretty undeniable, yet sadly the biggest gap in PAM's collection
is indeed a major Rothko (he is depicted in a Milton Avery in the collection though). We do get see some major loaner Rothkos here from time to time though (like his Homage to Matisse last year). The city
was beginning as a sad kind of cultural coma when Rothko left so nobody today
questions his decision to leave. Back then you hd to go to New York, these days
New Yorkers tend to want to move here. It's very different today and it always
strikes me how much Rothko's writings remind me of certain Reed alumni I run
into at Portland coffee houses.
HDTV people can see it at 7:00 PM everone else has to wait until 10:00 PM. I know a lot of Portlanders who dont even bother to own TVs so maybe we can all meet at a Pearl District sports bar and do the unthinkable, subject the monday night crowd to cultural programming!
Well the list of 28 artists for the 2008 Contemporary Northwest Art Awards
is out and 3 to 5 of them will make up the exhibition next June. One will be
awarded the $10,000 Arlene Schnitzer Prize...(more)
Museum of Contemporary Craft exhibition space photo by Sarah Henderson
Ok now that the big opening weekend has ended let's give the Desoto
project some more sober analysis beyond the not underserved fawning weve already experienced...(much more)
Cook'n with PAM (and a look at the latest acquisitions)
One of PAM's latest acquisitions: Judy Chicago's Pasadena Lifesaver, Blue Series #4(1969-70) Acrylic lacquer on acrylic
It is pretty clear now that the Portland Art Museum is a very different institution
than it was in 2005. PAM has taken a decidedly more intellectually engaged
turn since Brian Ferriso took over. Here are some scoops
and other info nuggets regarding PAM's new Director, CNAA, programming and latest acquisitions.... (more)
Steven Holl's new Nelson-Atkins Museum expansion has people raving, be it from Paul
Goldberger to Tyler
Green. I keep thinking somehow that the failure of the Bellvue
Art Museum in Seattle cost Steven Holl the
MoMA gig and we all lost out with a rather conservative museum. Hell, even
the new Seattle
Art Museum (which is basically a lil MoMA) seemed to be created in the shadow
of BAM's sad sad failure. The very best living museum architects are (in no
particular order): Herzog
& de Meuron, Tadao Ando and Renzo Piano because they all seem to be
able to create iconic architecture that is also ideal for viewing art (Koolhaas,
Libeskind and Gehry are way more idiomatic). Is Holl about to crack into the
top tier by being both fresh and subtle?
Also, I Dont Know (an
excellent site I just became aware of) found what I had to say about Bryan Shellinger
useful
for discussing Tomma Abts. I definitely had her in mind as well but I had to draw the
line somewhere in that orgy
of abstract painter namedropping. Always exciting when there is a little
intellectual feedback, thanks... (more)
I toured the Milepost 5 facilities few months ago and this could be great, yes there are rental units as well.
By providing both affordable condos and afforable live/work space this could be a model development. What is nice is they have opted to not over define what all of the common spaces will be used for.
Of course the real trick will be how they determine who gets in. Bad gatekeeping (aka petty and tasteless cronyism) would be disasterous and good gatekeeping (smart people with open minds, good taste and not much pointless drama) could make this a model development.
Ok we are nearing the end of the conceptual phase of PORT's redesign and moving into the actual site redevelopment. The funny thing is it won't look that different when it is done but the refinements and flexibility it will offer us will be quantum.
You should see it by the end of summer and yes we will have bash as an unveiling
+ a somewhat belated celebration of our 2 year anniversary.
Till then check out these interesting bits:
This VIP
garden in Slovenia is frankly awesome, something about plants and architecture
really works. A restaurant or lounge like this would go over really well in
Portland. Ok so the Hanging
Gardens of Babylon provide a pretty good template for this type symbiotecture.
Lastly Jerry Saltz did a good thing by avoiding
the opening hooplah of the Venice Biennale and his take points out a new
direction for him, having the last word rather than the first. Also, Saltz's
recent take on Biennial culture is almost as funny as the whole transforming
robot obsession. Jerry how about a your first broadway musical?.. call it "Biennial."
Kelsey Grammar, William Shattner, Courney Love and maybe Nicholas Cage would
all be good people to play curators.
Allright, I've abused the whole lets turn it into a musical meme enough now.
A reminder to artists, galleries, and event organizers: If you want your opening, event, lecture, etc. to be posted at PORT, it needs to make it to my inbox! driscollm at gmail dot com.
Dates for the Affair at the Jupiter Hotel Art Fair 2007
Simply put The Affair at the Jupiter Hotel is just one of the nicest feeling art fairs I've been to. It's also becoming more of an attractive destination each year for those outside the region.
According to the Portland Art Focus web page the event is supposed to take place September 14-16th, which is during the tail end of PICA's TBA festival. That is a few weeks earlier than last year and resolves a few conflict with other events internationally while doubling up on TBA's draw. We will let you know about the gallery lineup as soon as it is available.
With a relentlessness seen in very few places, Portland's citizenry love to discuss and attempt to define Portland. It is an impossible pastime. Still, as part of our
two year anniversary PORT asked 7 artists to take a shot at picking what is good and or "definitely Portland" about Portland...
"Think With the Senses - Feel with the Mind. Art in the Present Tense." The 52nd Venice Biennale commenced last week, and everybody's talking about it.
I'm going to save my "routine physical" article on the Portland art
and design ecosystem till after Commissioner
Sam's shindig tomorrow night. Till then check in on Winkleman's
Venice compendium. I know a lot of Portlanders that are doing the big European
art junket this year.
Arts organizations are seen as key for tourism and therefore aren't so "dependent" on the larger economic climate, instead they take an active driving role in the overall
economic health of the city. I realize this is preaching to the choir but studies
like this might get the Portland business community more behind arts funding.
Things like TBA, The
Affair at the
Jupiter Hotel, the Portland
Art Museum and all of the exhibitions that regularly
take place here do have an effect,
The latest report puts the total economic contributions of arts activity at
318.26 million dollars, that is up from 262 million in 2001. That said, support
for the arts is hardly keeping up with the massive increases in activity in
Portland and in general the artists are completely under supported... there
isn't even a decent suitcase fund for artists who wish to show elsewhere. Portland
is doing well as a cultural incubator in spite of bass-akwards arts funding
approaches... which plays into Comissioner
Sam's talk tuesday... Im apparently jamming some guitar with Adams Saturday
night for the the Bus Project
"Wheelies" VIP event so this is all interesting.
I'll have a very comprehensive article on the Portland art and architectural
climate/ecosystem on Monday, probably the most important piece of writing I've
ever done.
The creative community in Portland is supposed to be a front burner political
issue so Commissioner Sam Adam's wants your input on, "how to reach Portland's
full creative capacity?" Hopefully this wont be your basic, "let's
listen very closely and do nothing," approach that politicians have perfected
over the years. I'll be there and yes I suspect whoever comes up with the most
intelligent creative sector plan will be the next Mayor.
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
6:00 to 8:00 p.m. (Doors open at 5:30)
Portland Center Stage, 128 NW Eleventh Ave at Davis St.
Hosted by: Sam Adams, Portlands Commissioner of Arts and Culture; Portland
Development Commission; Regional Arts and Cultural Council; and Northwest Business
for Culture & the Arts
Beverages and light snacks will be served. Wine, beer and alcohol available.
This townhall is free and open to the public but space is limited so please
RSVP by Friday, June 8, 2007 RSVP to Polly Birge. If you've already RSVP'd,
no need to do so again.
Today is PORT's second anniversary. It's still a labor of love but being the top
ranked google site for "Portland Art" plus a large readership that doubles
every 3 to 5 months is definitely rewarding. Our goal has been to provide an intelligent,
internationally relevant and critical
voice for the Portland Art Scene. Since the visual arts are one of the key
forces transforming Portland, PORT's role makes it no ordinary blog. It's exciting
how many international readers find the site worthwhile too and being influential
at home doesn't hurt either. (Stay tuned, I'll have Rembrandt post later on today)
Actually, we don't get enough chances to thank you PORT readers and sponsors.
Take a bow... (more)
Ahhh, David Row over at the O blogs has yet
another insecurity filled diatribe on criticism and bloggers... which is
generally spot on in theory, though needlessly reactionary towards democratic
expression. Look, people with little worth as critics don't attract audiences
and have little opinion shaping authority. Yes, newspapers are full of near
useless critics, they also have some good ones (the O's Shawn Levy is good and
Randy Gragg recently left).... elsewhere The LA Times Christopher Knight is
superb as are Roberta Smith and Regina Hackett at the Seattle PI (who should
be lured to Portland... it will take more than breadcrumbs).
Sure, everyone is capable of being critical but a critic is someone who develops
a critical practice with an awareness and responsiblity to the relevance of
the words (even when the critic is just wrong, real critics risk it). I'm trained
as a critic/historian and I remember the 600 level writing course in grad school
as a kind of relentless hypercritical boot camp, but the truth was I was always
thinking, "what does this mean?" Having been raised Lutheran didn't
hurt either, but I ultimately liked the critical part more than the religious
elements.
It is true, good critics are really hard to find and when PORT hires someone
I usually end up with these strange moments where I try to look at the gestalt
of the potential critic and I think, "do they have it in them to do this
month in month out?" The secret is they always have to care about the subject
deeply, then back it up with knowledge... not just a reaction. There is a place
for tour guide wordsmiths but they arent as influential as the critics with
teeth. A critic who isn't into their subject isn't an effective critic.
I'm amadant that PORT's critics have strong art backgrounds but that is just
the starting criteria.
Gursky at Matthew Marks this month
For example of the real deal, read Jerry
Saltz's latest here. I think he's wrong about Gursky's post 9/11 importance,
but I can see how this show looks out of touch. Is Gursky just whistling past
the graveyard? Well maybe, but it reflects the way power and amnesia inducing
commerce do act these days.
Did 9/11 change consumer's appetite for Soma? No.
For example there are the Global
Warming Ready Diesel ads, a kind of reverse psychology ad campaign aimed
at youth's ability to ignore the obvious while not being ignorant. One that
Ive seen in Rolling Stone etc. sports a young, good looking couple cavorting
atop a skyscraper. Below them it appears the ocean has covered the cityscape
in a kind of Neroesque catastrophe (have the polar ice caps melted?) One can
clearly make out that the rich have survived the deluge in party yachts sailing
the ruined civilization. Is Gursky out of touch? not so much as he is in touch
with the out of touch. Saltz is right that it might be getting old and watered
down, but when does a lie that tells the truth really get old? As a true critic
Saltz gets it wrong for the right reasons. As a fan I would like Gurksy to kick
it up a notch because he's gotten a little too close to the Diesel ads so Jerry's kinda right.
PNCA Benefactor To Lead a Major Cultural Breakthrough for Portland
PNCA just received a major gift that will provide the final push in transforming it from a small, struggling school to a major force in the art world. Hallie E. Ford and the Ford Foundation will donate $15 million, twice the school's annual budget and the largest single donation to an Oregon arts institution ever. $10 million will go to building a new artist residency program, which will not only allow PNCA students to work closely with internationally renowned visual artists, it will also bring a network of innovators into Portland. The Portland art scene stands to benefit immensely both from the establishment of PNCA as an important arts institution within and beyond the region, and from the influx of artists and ideas that the residency program will contribute to the community. Read more about the donation, as well as all the recent improvements at PNCA, on OregonLive.
The Oregonian has a bit on the
newest iteration of the Oregon Biennial today, it has resurfaced at the Portland
Art Center. Good move, It is a turning point for PAC because they are known
more for good intentions than authoritative programming and this forces that
issue (Gavin's honest about it and understands this as a growth opportunity).
I'm endorsing it and suggested this obvious move (with some cautionary caveats).
Yes, I've been in on this, which is why I haven't said anything till now (sometimes
scoops matter less than letting things catalyze and develop)...(more)
Rosalind Krauss and Miranda July separated at birth?
In my somewhat differently kiltered mind Rosalind
Krauss and Miranda
July are twins separated at birth... as both explore different aspects of alienation
with piquant clarity. Ok so Krauss is a touch more academic
Krauss is one of the most important Modern and Postmodern critics having written,
"The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths." It
will be interesting to see how she's reacting to these relatively anti-theory
driven (but career oriented) art times. Catch her at the Portland
Art Museum Sunday May 20th at 2:00 PM. $5 members, $10 for everyone else.
July is Western Civilization's 21st century postergal for the early aughts
(look it just can't be Paris Hilton). Of course she's a former Portlander
and yes she is speaking tonight for PICA
at the First Congregational Church from 7-8PM on her new book "No One
Belongs Here More Than You." Amazingly tickets are still available at the
door. $10 for members, $13 for everyone else (so get em early today)
Mark Rothko (who grew up and trained as an artist here in Portland) just
shattered the auction record for contemporary work... he would have hated this.
Some day Portland will have a major Rothko of its own on display, dammit!
Oh well, if his works keep setting records I half expect Rothko's ghost to show
up and get all "Raiders of the Lost Ark ending" on the auction houses.
At the same time it's probably worth the price paid.
Back onto the art, I really enjoyed Peter Schjeldahl's take on Chris
Burden. I like how he highlights how Burden was taking pains to be taken
seriously as an artist. Most artists who admire Burden don't do the same thing,
they just reference his work and do something much easier to do. The difference
between Burden and Burden-lite is a sense of earning the attention by truly
polarizing people rather than just trying to use the conceptual as a form of
insinuation or secret handshake of initiation. Just hanging out or referencing
Burden isn't in the same league. Burden put the viewer on the spot so well you
don't have to have seen it to feel uncomfortable. Successful art is often complicated, great art simly is complicating... a radical agitator like Burden is a great example.
Also, Schjeldahl's
take on Hopper pinpoints why he's such a useful writer (at least on completely
established, major artists), he's an accessible but challenging wordsmith. Schjeldahl
complicates very strong work with equally deserving words. The only wordsmith
better is Hickey, whose just scary even when he's not convincing (which has
it's own curse).
Tyler Green is probably
right, the Hirshhorn is perfect for Wolfgang Tillmans. But is it a crutch? Is the installation the selling point or just packaging for
the blockbuster? Now I dont think Tillmans is fluff he's real good. His more
abstract stuff is consistently dazzling as are some of the portraits and still
lives, but is the entertainer/installer upstaging the photographer from time
to time? Does that matter?...maybe not, since the installations are often so good. Here's what
I wrote on the show last year at the MCA.
It's been ridiculous for several years but the auction house madness continues.
Here is some auction house reading that tends to bore me in interesting ways:
Artnet has a nice report on Sotheby's
278.5 million dollar art-o-rama... completely boring except for the fact
that Lyonel Feininger is getting some respect (he's my Mom's 3rd favorite artist,
but she only likes the cityscapes, her fave is Pierre
Soulages... which impresses me for it's flat out obscurity). Then there were the Christies sales, which Artnet saw as a sobering of the market.
Also on Artnet is Charlie Finch (who usually annoys me), he does
some number crunching on the hedge funders. Sure, doom is coming but probably
in the Fall at the earliest... (it might be years from now though, egad)
Today in the NYT's Carol Vogel, whom I also find really tiresome, took in some
European bargain hunting. Maybe it's only a matter of time before some artist
creates their own sarcastic auction house where sculptures of Tobias Meyer etc.
will be sold at inflated bargain prices to Europeans taking advantage of the
weak US dollar?
A lot of the cooler major collectors I've met hate auctions and I can see why...
and yes lot of the stuff offered just isn't that good (yet goes for a premium).
Auctions aren't about patronage and it distracts from the pursuit of new work
and ideas. The money part bores me and isn't any more surprising than other
silly crowd-feuled behavior like the
Macarana.
Ok most insiders have known about this forever but the Pacific
Northwest College of Art has now officially launched its MFA program, giving
Portland a much needed second MFA. Previously only PSU produced MFA's but PNCA's
program is unique in the region because it is mentor based, which a little similar
to what Goldsmiths
college's does. The 15 MFA candidates have already been selected and will
start in the Fall. Notably, 75% of the candidates aren't from Portland (which
is just about in keeping with the general population of Portland's art scene
these days). The competition should also highlight the need for PSU to get more
serious about its program (which has improved tremendously with little support).
Here's what PNCA says via MK Guth, the new MFA program's chair: ... (more)
Roberta Smith takes on Frank
Stella's continuing slide into glorified mall art. I'm a fan of the pre
90's stuff, somebody stop him... he's become the art world analog of late Vegas era Elvis. Having the Met join in doesn't help.
New Seattle Art Museum opens, designed by Portland architect
Most of you know the Seattle
Art Museum is opening its new wing this week, designed by Portland's own Allied
Works Architects. It opens to the public next Saturday and to members today.
The building itself is pretty conservative and won't dethrone Rem Koolhaas' library
as the most awesome structure in Seattle but in some ways that's good, Ive grown
weary of stunt architecture for museums. Seattle is a city that collects architects
and it is nice that this building is designed to deflect attention to what kind
of art Seattle collects.
I toured the new facilities a few weeks ago with SAM's new contemporary curator...(more)
Brian Libby recaps the
Street of Eames in Portland (aka design obsessed city rapidly trying to
end years of bleh design... related: see
new tram review).
Normally I'm annoyed with focusing on the party and not the art... and I hate
Pabst (because I'm from Milwaukee Wisconsin and Pabst is the beer that made
Milwaukee famous... and it's no longer made in Milwaukee etc) but I just plain
feel like linking to ths PDXFF blog.
Jerry Saltz's latest
article for NY Magazine proves why he's the most important art critic on
the planet. That alone should be enough for you to check it out, but if you
need more; he deals with the pacification of ideas and intent in the art world
right now. Now don't get me wrong, all of the art of today isn't just some liberal
guilt pressure valve for trustfunders but a lot of it is. Why?...because it lacks a
radical impulse. Instead, a lot of today's art is based on ingratiating itself. When other critics simply ignore this problem Jerry gets at the issue, calling PS1's bluff.
Yes, I know I've been giving him a hard time lately but DK Row has picked up
one
of my old saws... why isn't PSU more serious about its art department? Right
now, it's the only MFA program in the city and doesn't have a full time curator
despite having several nice gallery spaces. PNCA will have a MFA starting this
fall and there are (unconfirmed) rumblings that Reed is looking to start one
as well. This puts pressure on PSU to become serious. Also, not to nag but the Oregonian should do more of this, PORT can't do everything and we really try to limit ourselves
to art criticism instead of investigative art journalism.
The Willamette
Week reviews a show at city hall. Note how mixing with artists has become
a political move in Portland? Still, I've yet to see a single politician present anything
convincing in regards to the city truly bettering the arts? Why not be like
Vancouver BC which allowed the CAG
to move to a new space by providing incentives to condo developers?
Yes, someone on the forums at Artdish has noticed that there is a ton
of photography in Portland with Photolucida this month. It's a nice overview
that we dont do here. (PORT's focus is more on in
depth reviews for individual shows).
As I mentioned earlier, the Portland
Art Museum has ended the Oregon Biennial and yes they are evolving it to
cover more of the Pacific Northwest in keeping with its Arlene and Harold Schnitzer
Center for Northwest Art. Last year, curator Jennifer Gately inaugurated the
Apex program which has already produced nice if small shows by Roy
McMakin and Chris
Johanson. Though respectable, the final
Oregon Biennial (also curated by Gately) seemed to be more of a recap or
bookreport of a living scene that is simply too dynamic for any museum to handle
en masse. Instead of leading, it was following with a fine "museum seal
of approval" which is more of a kind of community tokenism that perpetuates a glass
ceiling for artists here. As a reflection of higher standards in Portland it
seemed like something had to change to really make the Museum relevant to the
important discussions in contemporary art going on here. For those who saw the
Oregon Biennial as their one hope, I hate to say it but it wasn't. Many who
have been in them before saw the biennials as nice diversions but not central to their
goals. Whereas something like a Turner Prize gives outsiders something they
can really latch onto. Why not let some less authoritative organization take on the messy task of putting up a Portland Biennial?
Basically, less focused regional shows like Greater New York or the Oregon Biennial
just became tools for galleries as a way to spotlight and accentuate a mass
of artists thrown at a wall and waiting to see who sticks (There are reasons MoMA doesn't host GNY and PS1 does). In New York that's fine
but in the Pacific Northwest (where we have many artists who are superior to
similar East Coast or even California fare) it has resulted in missed opportunities, a lack of clear routes to national exposure and seen as an overall lack of cultural conviction.
The new format is way more focused and has evolved into something resembling
the Turner
Prize and SECA
awards. Its called the Contemporary Northwest Art Awards or CNAA (phonetically
it sounds like "nah" which I think is funny since this is a great
deal more focused and hence exclusionary take on the show). Get used to it people.
Note that the first word is "Contemporary" and the last is "Awards".
To me that implies points will be given for contemporary relevance and excellence...
it's infinitely more competitive, as it should be. It will effect how artists
work in the studio as many will work on more ambitious projects that don't necessarily
pay off in the galleries or many of the more rambling ad hoc group shows here. It encourages
major statements.
The end of the Oregon Biennial and the beginning of something else
The Portland Art Museum is revamping its Biennial program and it looks like
it will expand beyond Oregon. As luck would have it I'm in Vancouver BC right
now and one thing is for certain, no Northwest Biennial could be taken seriously
without inviting them too (Portland and Vancouver have the two most distinctive
and bustling scenes but Seattle has something to offer too).
Ill have details on this development Monday but I've
already brought up the need to make the Oregon Biennial more relevant and influential here... and since the Pacific Northwest is an international zone (Cascadia) with some impressive
art, this just makes sense. Will it be some sort of fawning craft-driven art
glass filled yard sale type show or something more focused, relevant and contemporary? Ill
let you know on Monday when PAM gives details.
As many already know, Sol LeWitt (one of my very favorite artists) died yesterday.
Michael Kimmelman's
LeWitt obit in the NYT's says something about the man who would rather be
about his work and Tyler Green has been keeping
theflame
as well.
Thankfully, there are many opportunities to see LeWitt's work in Portland too.
There is a wide array of his print works on display at the Portland
Art Museum for Jordan Schnitzer's Minimalism/Postminimalism prints show
(it's gorgeous BTW). Also there is a really nice open cube (one of my favorite series of works ever, on display at the Jubitz Center. The Liz Leach Gallery already had a selection of his prints up before the sad news too.
Instead of blathering on about how I love his baroque process driven reductive
art (his conceptualism wasn't so full of conceptual baggage... so it was more
a form of systemic premeditation, which is more akin to engineering). I'll give
you a bit from local artist Jesse
Hayward, whose life was changed while working on a LeWitt project:
"Sol LeWitt brought to focus a process-driven abstraction with conceptual
underpinning and installation sensibility. His work, minimalist and luxurious,
collaborative and depersonalized, demonstrates the depths of abstract thinking
as made real through the heights of public display. Helping execute LeWitt's
WALL DRAWING #214 back in 1991 changed me as an artist. Many young artists worked
on his projects. Many young artists were changed. This drawing was to be made
of "unstraight" lines. As a highschooler, I felt I needed a little
more direction and asked the artist to clarify what kind of "unstraight"
line he had in mind. Was he thinking wildly frenetic or just plane wobbly?
I chuckle thinking now of that situation. He gave me nothing. An "unstraight"
line is an "unstraight" line. For me, it was a moment of tremendous
possibility, the horizons of my life explained through the generous conceits
of a master artist.
LeWitt's lineage is strong and his influence deceptively pervasive. His ideas
live on in Bernard Freize's predetermined process, Sue Williams' abstract logic
and, to make the largest leap, the muralistic sensibility of Assume Astro Vivid
Focus." -Jesse Hayward
I
was the first to write about the issue but it wasn't a big secret, several
trustees of the museum were not happy with it either and we had some funny kvetching sessions about it. Thankfully, Ferriso has a very sophisticated sense of design (among other things) and it's a good thing too because Portland's design industry is huge
and we've been waiting for some up to date design action at Portland's top tier institutions, including the museum.
I'm remarkably recovered from last night's incredible event toasting Portland
artists (what great vibes and turnout, thank you!), here is some stuff to catch up on:
Reed has announced the 2007 Bonnie Bronson Fellowship winner: Laura Ross Paul, congratulations!
The award's ceremony is April
25 at Reed College.
Edward
Winkleman has a post on the "Painting Deathwatch." Hilarious...
personally, I like how Tal R. once described painting as a "zombie medium"
that keeps marching on... of course it's dead. You can't kill it because it is
already dead and the discussion is moot because the zombies are coming to get you! Oh you can
try to fight them but that puts you into a B grade horror movie with a bunch of brain eating
zombies. PORT will have an interview with one of the very best painters (a master
zombie maker?) alive today, stay tuned.
Jerry
Saltz is leaving The Village Voice, after two nominations for the Pulitzer
with no bouquet of flowers... was he being taken for granted in the newsprint world?
His new gig is at New York Magazine. Jerry is the most relevant art critic
on the planet because he takes risks, is willing to get it wrong in order to
get it right and he's relentless. Sure, he's said nice things about me but I
suspect he was trying to get a lot of Portlanders goats as well...he was trying
to out do Hickey and Schjeldhal and it's a mark of distinction that he really gets into the
mechanics of the cities outside of New York when he visits them. His lecture
in January 2004 for PICA (Stuart Horodner's last bit of programming) was the single best lecture weve had in the 8 years
I've lived here. It emphasized one thing, to be a good critic you have to be
decisive and driven in addition to being a comparative aesthetics ninja. Hats off Jerry, there are two types of critics, good ones that constantly
engage/challenge the process and burnouts who use a lot of crutches.
On Friday the O had a lot of coverage on Jordan
Schnitzer's minimalist and postminimalist print show at the Portland Art Museum
(Of course minimalism is a misnomer and fosters a lot of lazy rhetoric but eh
it serves a starting point for discussing; hedonism, Epicurean ideals, material,
systemic production and rules before the home computer became a reality, context
and asceticism). The
cover article on the show was fine, it's unrealistic to expect the O to
be the New York Times and it is an OK primer for newbies. PORT readers might be
bored with it though (treating minimalism is if isnt the omnipresent source
of a lot of yuppie aesthetic porn [come on, you know which design mags] and treats it like some sort of underdog still proving itself).
It's true a book and tour would have been nice, but it is not like that couldn't still
happen (the timeline for a book by the opening would have been too tight though... also I wonder why no mention of the 6 page color publication???).
The better bit is DK
Row's interview with Jordan Schnitzer, his blog version of the story has
expanded content. Maybe some of my grousing might have had an effect???
though one article doesn't reverse a trend that has most of the Portland art
world writing off our largest daily newspaper's coverage. At least it's a good
step.
Two things that never change: money and more change
Ditto on Tyler
Green's boredom with lazy art writing that is mostly focused on money. It's
the ideas and cultural shifts that legitimize art, museums, interesting cities and the writing
about them... not so much the transaction fees (those fade). Saatchi said it best, "The rich will always be with us."
Once that is accepted (the French and Bolshevik revolutions proved it) then
the real work of, "what ideas are being explored, what are the tough questions
of the age, etc." can be tackled. Sure, one has to be a little nuts to
go against the flow, but one also has to be more than bright and talented to
change the flow of that stream.
Also, I felt Holland
Cotter's piece which spurred Tyler Green's words did bring up the most important
point, where is the cultural leadership? Is that kind of leadership a thing
any civilization can entrust to museums? Isn't that the domain of driven individuals
who want to change the world? I loved Cotter's take on cynicism as "exhausting
and pacifying."
Portland from 2001-2003 went through a war between cynics and optimists. The
optimists won (or at least the knee jerk cynics stopped freaking out long enough
to become begrudging optimists who freak out less and ask better questions). Slowly but surely the city's
other organs of culture have been catching up in with the continuing growth
spurt. I'm pretty sure this ride wont be smooth so don't expect anything good to come from mildness or mere good intentions. To survive in the rapidly developing arts ecosystem here, cultural productions in Portland have to foreground an informed passion
and a real esoteric depth (there are no accidents in these departments). Yes, I'm still
working on my piece about Portland now (on Sunday it will be 8 years) and the
main tasks at hand.
Yup, Portland is a hotbed for indie filmmaking, check out the latest with Joseph
Gallivan's article on the Pander Brother's new movie in the Tribune. Note
how the look of Portland is of such importance. The Pander brothers, Arnold and
Jacob are artists as well and I had drinks Sunday night at Thatch
a newish Tiki bar festooned with Arnold's awesome velvet paintings along with
a bunch of former Trader Vic's statuary.
Surprise surprise, the Oregonian
doesn't get Chris Johanson. It's the kind of regionalist reactionary coverage
we have come to expect from the O (ok they do a good job with voyeuristic photography like Crewdson etc.).
For a more balanced take this is what PORT
wrote last month. I think the installation part of the APEX show is one of
the better ones Ive seen him do.
Johanson at his best is a brilliant poet and not so much an outsider as an inside leader of an international trend in valuing indie cred sincerity
(always a difficult thing to gage). It is related to the WTO riots. What is
sad is that the O failed to explore why Portland is appealing to Johanson and
thousands of other artists... the city is one giant conscientious objection
to the second half of the 20th century. 100 years from now Johanson (along with
Basquiat) will be seen as a voice to contend with in a sea of meganational and
yuppie aesthetic slickness. (I'm coming up on my 8th anniversary in Portland
and I'll be publishing a big picture piece this week discussing that very thing).
The Mercury's
review of the Johanson show also makes some nice points but I felt the childlike
angle infantilized the work in a way that leads to readings like that in the
O. Johanson's less a child and more like someone who shuns refinement for refinement's sake.
The best bit of art writing published this March was Peter
Schjeldahl's awe inspiring take on Robert Ryman and Franz West etc. He's
great, even brilliant with Ryman but gets Murakami wrong of course. Murakami
is uber-whoring the drama in a very professional/insidious way that makes the
drama very nihilistic. He's basically outflanking the idea starved art world
along with Schjeldahl
in the process. Why? because he has gotten a lot of credit for the last great
idea (the complete flattening of consumption and culture, best showcased at art fairs). Also, I'm enjoying
their new website design too, much better and more linkable.
I'm curious about how people in the art community will react to the front page
story in the Oregonian about
some creatives being edged out? Clearly gentrification is a double edged
sword, combining higher rents with an opportunity for better arts patronage. The devil is in the details on this issue.
I'd call it a cultural distillation process and the city's character is at stake, the
weird part of Portland needs to get distilled and weirder as well. The real
corner to turn here is patronage and that means the word sophistication needs
to come into play amongst developers, politicians, RACC, collectors and the
press (especially the O). Art for populism's sake (which panders to an assumed
audience rather than challenging it) isn't enough, it takes challenging art
programming, which is frankly a lot weirder than work that merely gestures at
populism while hoping it will somehow to help creatives.
Sophisticated artists aren't just a little different, they are extremely idiosyncratic.
Portland is blessed with a lot of very serious artists and the city government
has made a lot of noise about this. Still, little has been done. In fact the
Everett
Station Lofts (circa 1989) are still the best
hotbed for emerging visual arts culture in town. Here's a prediction, whoever
wins the next mayoral election will do so because they actually have a truly
sophisticated arts plan that goes beyond minor gestures.
Prince Claus bridge by UN Studio
Also, the I-5 bridge is too important to nickle and dime or second guess like
this story
in the Tribune. We need a design competition (Calatrava, Foster, UN Studio
etc.) federal funds and an attitude that this will shape the region for the
next 70 years. Why not plan on spening 8 billion plus and do it right. This requires big thinking not hunting for a bargain, it will
cost us sorely in the long run if we don't.
My opinion on such discussions is short and sweet, those who wallow in the
regionalism thing beget more wallowing regionalism, it's a defensive self-perpetuating
cycle that becomes brittle and trite. I've said it a lot, "on the Internet everything
is local." The art wold has never been so regionally level and one's focus determines their trajectory (not to say you wont have to work hard if you are in Portland or Seattle).
Also, the Northwest and Portland
in particular are indicative of a different kind of America and people are flocking
here to find it, it isn't regionalism it's a kind of lightning rod and a conscious
decision to find a new way. Really, it's a leadership thing now and the TAM biennial
missed the mark there, once again giving Seattle reason to mock Tacoma. I hate being right about these things. Was
the show just a ploy to get Seattle to pay attention? Also, though the Portland
selections are fair it definitely doesn't give one any idea of the scope of
things that are going on down here, if anything it sidesteps the most active
art scene in the two states. I think the show could be important but the cramped
potpourri curatorial model didn't make that case. To be fair, TAM has been doing the best job of collecting PNW artists of any museum in the area. They have even been giving them coherent solo shows, which is partly why this show has sparked so much dissapointment...(more)
Sneak peek at the new Museum of Contemporary Craft
Main gallery, Museum of Contemporary Craft
Yesterday, director David Cohen gave the press and other culturalists a tour
of the Museum of
Contemporary Craft's still unfinished 15,000 sg ft. facilities on Portland's North Park
Blocks. The main gallery will have soaring 22 foot ceilings and an impressive
overlook. The other galleries are more intimate but no less refined. I'm thrilled
that they are keeping the old glass as its irregularities produce cool visual
distortions of the outside world activating the viewers perceptual acuity, which can
then be trained on the exhibitions. The museum will also have a climate controlled
archive and preparation space. The renamed
DeSoto building is a commercial condo so the museum and other tenants will
own their spaces.
Other features include a community room for meetings and a 3,000 sq foot outside
"events" deck for all of the tenants. With other tenants like Bluesky, Augen & Foelick galleries as well as a new photography gallery by Charles
Hartman it should further solidify Portland's core of easy to walk art spaces
on the west side. Another plus, most of these gallery spaces have soaring ceilings
with lots of light, something sorely missed since the demise of the original
Savage Gallery whose space was better than most in Chelsea.
The new Museum space will open July 22nd and their last shows in their old space run through March 11th, so last chance.
It's been an interesting week up in Seattle with critic Matthew
Kangas coming under a full scale ethics probe on the Stranger's Blog (the
SLOG) for requesting artwork from artists he reviewed. I find this practice
very distasteful. I even dislike the constant use of art auctions and other
situations where artists give up work for fundraisers. It's predatory and Im
not just speaking for myself here, a lot of dealers and artists in Portland
have absolutely had it. Good cause or not it's promoting a culture of pressuring and leaching
off of artists (in a developing art economy like Portland it undermines markets unfairly).
Portlander's pay close attention to Tyler's
take on the the Albright-Knox Gallery in Buffalo. It is the exact opposite
situation of the Portland Art Museum, which needs to reach out to the ever increasing
young/savvy art conscious workforce that Portland continues to attract (we are
gaining rather than than losing to larger cities like New York and LA). My sense
from our jam packed lunch a while back is that PAM's
new director Brian Ferriso is well aware of this situation and plans to act
in the near future...it has been years since a major contemporary show at the
museum (Though Roxy Paine, Hirst
and Kehinde Wiley are more than just hors d'oeuvres, call em brunch?).
Also, stay tuned for my review of one of those transplanted upstate New Yorkers
today.
The Portland Tribune reported last week on a
smaller supplementary I-5 replacement bridge. I dislike this idea intensely
as a cost saving measure. Ive heard figures like, "20% of US trade passes
over the I-5 bridge each year," so skimping doesnt make any sense. Look, for such a project the fed's should
be on board, especially since with light rail it would have such an effect
on interstate traffic/commerce. Underbuilding is flat out stupid. I live on
N. Interstate and I see the traffic snarls daily and it hasn't even gotten as bad
as it will get. It's also the most major public works project to hit the Northwest
in decades. Time for a design competition; Foster, Calatrava, UN Studios etc...(more)
Oh a curatorial
final four, although a lot of interesting curators are missing; Robert Storr,
Phillipe Vergne (who missed the boat by not visiting Portland for the last Whitney
Biennial show) and Michael Darling?... why not add in Tobias Meyer for sheer
lunacy?
I pick:
Lynne Cooke, Paul Schimmel, Thelma Golden (Whitney Biennial coming up, maybe
it will be a relevant one) and Hans Ulrich Obrist (who openly acknowledges that
artist curated clusters easily out pace curatorially defined constructs... which
is what you find in Portland but you just cant ask one curator who to see)
Tyler Green has picks too
(dude no way can Higgs take Bonami ... sorry Matthew you are too much of a "dry"
specialist to win this corrupt bourgeois competition)
Maybe you weren't in New York this weekend for the Armory show, maybe you were?
PORT's Amy Bernstein was there on assignment and we will have something from
her "too much art" weekend shortly.
Despite the increasing real estate development and institutional maturation (for example Small A Projects was just accepted into NADA) Portland is still unique for being mostly defined by its people and I'm happy to report they have a rapidly increasing international reach. The artists are still the
most influential and controversial force at work here and it will probably be
that way for the next decade as...(much more)
A little butterfly told me, Damien Hirst has a new show
There is a convenient scandal brewing, did
Damien Hirst rip off artist Lori Precious?... uh no but check it out here. Let's
just say, ideas, butterflies and even PR stunts get recycled all the time. Kinda
neat how Hirst isn't having this show in New York this Armory weekend huh? I'm a huge fan and though
I doubt this was orchestrated directly it's a testament to the guy that people think he's capable
of it (well he is, but why try when this kind of stuff can be almost counted on). The title of the show is "Superstition."
It is a show title I wanted to use someday... arrgh, but it's totally appropriate. Also, PORT's own rather involved Damien
Hirst review will be up tomorrow.
Jen Graves at the Stranger has reviewed
the Northwest Biennial at the Tacoma Art Museum. I saw the show this past
weekend and I pretty much agree with her assessment, except the Schweder had
kinda disintegrated by the time I saw it. Ive seen most of it before in...(more)
I'll be posting that list of Portland artists with shows outside of town in 2007
that Ive promised (maybe later today). Till then:
The Guardian
is claiming that Liverpool is like San Francisco with greyer weather? Ha,
that doesn't sound anything like Portland at all does it? Actually we don't
want that kind of title here and the fact is Portland is kinda the anti San
Francisco. Which is why in 2005 the Norton collection's curator remarked to
me, "All of San Francisco's best artists are moving to Portland."
It isn't just Harrell Fletcher and Chris Johanson... there are a pile of others
like Patrick Rock, Jesse Hayward, Brittany Powell, Emily Counts, Todd Johnson
and even Brenden Clenaghen ...etc. (it's a huge list) who all have done stints
in SF only to settle here.
Sure, Portland has similarities to an older San Fransisco but it's different,
we arent a financial center and we are more of an alternative to the mistakes
of the second half of the 20th century. Ideologically the PDX thing is something completely different. Add in over 10,000 artists to the mix
of a city this size and see what happens. The city is a rebel base and I think it's increasingly dfficult to talk accurately about Portland art without looking outside of Portland. To that end, PORT's Amy Berstein will be covering The Armory etc. this week in New York.
*Update: Matt McCormick just jogged my memory, he was in the Liverpool Biennial... see why the Portlanders outside of Portland post has taken so long to come out! (PDX-ers feel free to email me with updates before I publish the list tonight)
Nicolai Ouroussoff of the NTY's has denounced
the so-called Freedom Tower in his strongest words yet. I absolutely agree
and have stated many
times before how it is a massive failure of imagination. The only thing that
can do real justice to the site, city and nation is a much better design. A clumsy
restatement of the empire state building with a blast shield doesn't cut it. I
know it's probably too much to ask of the current President but if the state and
local governments can't get a developer of a national historical site to do it
right it's time for the national government to step in. (then again could they
do better? ....uggh it's times like these that I actually yearn for LBJ...
yes that is what it has come to)
On a more local public art front Portland
Public Art, The Portland Tribune and the
Mercury have been on top of the evolving failure of the dragon sculptures
in Portland's Chinatown from early on... (more)
By now PORT readers, you have read Jenn's announcement that she is leaving the
publication to focus on her excellent gallery, Motel.
This is no surprise between the two of us and we have been implementing a slow
phase out of her essential role for over a year. No drama here, just change
PORT isn't where either of us spends the majority of our time. Others who can
devote more time to this small scale but successful and innovative publication
will be stepping in to help take it to the next level. I will continue in my role. It's just a natural growth situation that we saw
coming a long time ago.
PORT itself is more successful than ever with over 25,000 unique individual
readers per month and is the top ranked site when you Google "Portland"
& "Art." Recently, the Walker
Art Center's blog singled us out as one of the 10 best art blogs on the
planet wow. Many of you come back daily and we are grateful for your eyes.
With those numbers and reputation weve looked at how to grow the operation
from its current small (but influential) scale to a slightly larger one. To those ends we are
going to be hiring at least 1 new critic + adding some new sponsors, both big
and small. In other words, weve both been doing PORT on the side and its business now demands some attention and fresh management divisions. What wont change is our focus
on presenting critical
content and information about art both locally and internationally. Thank
you Jenn, you've been