Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Resist: Inauguration at Una Gallery
Early February links
First Thursday Picks February 2017
Dead tree media & dead horse flogging news
Post Snowpocalypse Weekend Picks
More Disjecta'd
New Year opportunities
Monday Integrity Links
First Thursday Picks January 2017
Jason Berlin + Alanna Risse at Rainmaker
Saying goodby to 2016
Mid December Links

recent comments

Double J
melia
Double J
jerseyjoe
lsd

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Thursday 08.10.06

« PAM acquires video art from Biennial | Main | Drop in if you are in the neighborhood? »

Weekly Web Roundup


computer-woman.jpg

Though it may have seemed that the recent question about those selected for the 8th Northwest Biennial in the comments area was sloughed off, it got me to thinking. Often the question of gender comes up when a list like this comes out. In an effort to allow ourselves to judge the quality of the work rather than the quantity of men vs. women, I thought I’d try to gather some visual information.

Below is the list of artists; each name linked to one of the first sites upon “google”ing their name. It looks as though Oregon’s biennial outdoes Tacoma’s for the battle of the sexes. 17/34 (Oregon) vs 15/41(Tacoma). Though their numbers are smaller will the ladies of the Greater Northwest kick as hard as they do in Oregon?


Victoria Adams

Juan Alonso
Daniel Attoe
Jay Backstrand
Justin Colt Beckman
Nicholas Brown
Cris Bruch
Buddy Bunting
Sally Cleveland
Judy Cooke
Claire Cowie
Mark Danielson
Susan Dory
Joe Fedderson
Ellen Garvens
John Grade
Victoria Haven
Patrick Holderfield
Denzil Hurley
Sarah Jane Lapp
Anya Kivarkis
Mack McFarland
Mark Takamichi Miller
Steven Miller
Jeffry Mitchell
Brian Murphy
Natalie Niblack
Nicholas Nyland
Mary Ann Peters
Jim Riswold
Phil Roach
Alex Schweder
Michael Spafford
Juniper Shuey
SuttonBeresCuller
Lisa Sweet
Keith Tilford
Marie Watt
Sherrie Wolf
Robert Yoder
Claude Zervas

In other news, Jo Jackson has a review for her show at Kavi Gupta in Chicago on Artkrush.

Gretchen Bennett, one of the stronger participants in the recent inClover show, gets a shoutout from Visual Codec.

Posted by Melia Donovan on August 10, 2006 at 22:08 | Comments (12)


Comments

The quality of work is of course a first concern, but it can never be the only concern when art is being made by women and either not seen or not written about. Or sold at a fraction of the price for a similar work made by a male. The statistics are in and they don't look good. Hurrah for Jennifer Gately to get past that, on top of pulling off an engaging show.

Posted by: lsd [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 11:52 AM

Ive always felt that female artists dominate Portland's scene both quantitatively and qualitatively. Only very recently have some of the guys really stepped up, Sean Healy, Brendan Clenaghen, Bruce Conkle, David Eckard, Brad Adkins even TJ Norris etc...

But with people like Pat Boas, Chandra Bocci, Jacqueline Ehlis, Ellen George, Linda Hutchins, Dianne Kornberg, Laura Fritz, Judy Cooke, MK Guth and Vanessa Renwick all in top form its tough to argue that women aren't the backbone of the scene.

What I find most annoying is that besides Jacqueline Ehlis none of the women really get the same kind of "major event" or "star" press focus (maybe its because Ehlis decided she had to speak out and she's become a leader because of it). Still, the press loves to print articles about loudmouthed men in Portland and I suppose that is an archetype I helped set up (hopefully my contribution has been qualitative) but I'm annoyed that women are treated as a quieter force in town.... when the truth is MK Guth and many others are very vocal... it just never ends up in print.

I think PORT could do something about this, email me some ideas. If you want to send some statements Ill compile them as a single post.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 01:21 PM

The statistics also point to the fact that more MFA's are awarded to women. So, if one were truly going to cater to numbers a strict division down the middle still doesn't cut it. The most disappointing and stupefying inclusions in the biennial are all men. Cut those and the numbers would be closer to the statistics.

Now, what about gallery representation in the city? Who's selling? Who's promoted? What's the gender division in the commercial spaces vs non-profit?

Posted by: melia [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 02:08 PM

From where I stand, the most disappointing and stupefying inclusions in the Biennial seem to be equally distributed. I wouldn't make a note to check out the solo shows of 25 or more of the 34 people in the show.

Posted by: jerseyjoe [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 02:22 PM

ok, i over-spoke. my apologies. looking back at the catalog, there are 3 women and 6 men i would have cut from the show. regardless, i find this tack of argument to be quite tender. it's easy to get irate and distracted. from my point of view it's better to talk about the work.

which-getting back to the matter at hand-have you taken a look at the sites? some of it is really exciting. some of it, again, stupefying. what motivates the choice?

Posted by: melia [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 03:36 PM

What motivates your decision to cut 3 women and 6 men? Your answer is likely the same or close to what the jurors for the Tacoma Biennial would give.

Posted by: jerseyjoe [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 05:26 PM

good point. aesthetics, i suppose, for myself. the jurors, however, have to have additional motivators-commerce, social particpation, politics, etc.

the question i'm interested in at the moment concerns the function of the biennial. what purpose does it serve?

Posted by: melia [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 06:36 PM

In the case of the Tacoma Biennial, artists were encouraged to include press packets. But if certain artists are not written about, that could definitely play into the element of choice. The committee looked at all kinds of things, not just images and work.

Posted by: lsd [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 11, 2006 06:39 PM

Historically, the Biennial is the most well-attended, most publicized, and most debated art show in the state. For some, being included in the Biennial acts as a gateway to finding local or regional gallery representation and a greater audience for their work.

On the flipside, it's kind of goodwill gesture by the museum towards the regional art-world. Patrons of local galleries might begin to support the museum if they see that the work they support is also supported by the museum, and vice versa.


Posted by: jerseyjoe [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 12, 2006 11:24 AM

Really, quality is what matters here, any omnibus regional art biennial should be able to cover all of the demographics and still be provocative. In theory, biennials are also just a sample of the best that is available. Also, they aren't necessary in order to get gallery representation. In fact the area is littered with unrepresented artists who have been in Oregon and Northwest biennials. Frankly, the gallery system only works for some types of artists.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 13, 2006 11:58 AM

First off, I donít think the contents of biennials are the best thatís on offer, Jennifer Gately says as much in her catalog essay. When the selection is by jury it is not the best--just whatís on offer.

To be sure a regional biennial certainly holds the goal to catalyze as well as to capitalize. Bolstering a local arts economy might be a part of the goal as well. Certainly, the biennial catalog acts as a research tool for inter/national institutions like the Whitney. Looking through the Whitneyís library catalog ( http://library.whitney.org/ ) and doing a broad search for biennial I found listing after listing of regional and sub-genre biennial catalogs.

The first biennial was the Venice Biennale, started in 1895, according to the Oxford English Dictionary of Art, for I could find no other comprehensive text on the subject of the history of biennials as a contemporary event. Sao Paulo then Paris soon followed with some regional American biennials beginning in the postwar era. Actually the Venice Biennale lost steam and revitalized after the war as well. So, the biennial, by and large, is a postwar phenomenon with a blossoming of regional and sub-genre biennials within the last two to three decades-mostly juried, with an entry fee. Concurrent to that you have a rise in the number of institutions that house contemporary art collections and a rise in the number of MFA programs.

If 900+ people, from four states are vying for 41 spots and 700+ from one state are applying for 34 spots it seems that something is out of balance. Institutions can only collect so much. Galleries can only show so much. Supply is up-demand is down? I havenít been keeping up with Dave Hickey lately but 6 years ago in a lecture he gave at Hunter he predicted a collapse of the contemporary art institution beginning with the MCA in Chicago. With the proliferation of new non-profits and arts oriented organizations sprouting locally, coupled with the influx of artists-neglecting the education of a consumer culture seems like energy misplaced.

Posted by: melia [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 13, 2006 08:04 PM

I don't always agree with what Hickey says (his general dismissal of nearly all institutions being one example ...but damn can the man write) but I think he was speaking more to the idea of institutionalized mediocrity.

He and I are both from the Weimar school of thought, that it takes close knit groups of highly astute individuals with strong personal associations to get anything worth while accomplished. Great things dont happen by chance.

Hickey's essay "my Weimar" is probably the best when it comes to understanding where he is coming from.

That said there was a prolifration of non-descript "art centers" nationally during the 90's. Many of them have failed, most recently Con-Works in Seattle. Part of there problem was (to paraphrase Disraeli) they were so comprehensive that nobody could comprehend them.

Wheras, small, and genunely innovative "communities of desire" (Hickey's term) can accomplish great things... it's still a stuggle. Later on once there is a track record an institution can expand.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 14, 2006 10:13 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee