Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Monday Links
Anything but artifacts: John Brodie + F&D Cartier
Museums & Generations
Monday Links
Interview with William Pope. L
Weekend Picks
Guggenheim Mural Restoration
Monday Links
Women In Art for 2014?
Second Weekend Picks March 2014
First Thursday Picks March 2014
Whitney Biennial Links

recent comments

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Wednesday 10.06.10

« First Thursday Picks October 2010 | Main | Second Weekend Picks October 2010 »

Interview with Mark Grotjahn



PAM-Grotjahn-1.jpg

Installation of Untitled (Dancing Black Butterflies) at the Portland Art Museum


Mark Grotjahn's Untitled (Dancing Black Butterflies) is currently on display at the Portland Art Museum until October 17, 2010. The exhibition includes a series of very large drawings with a remarkable tactile and material quality. Mr. Grotjhan is represented by the Gagosian Gallery in New York and Blum and Poe in Los Angeles.


What was it like growing up in California? Did you go to LACMA in Los Angeles or SFMOMA in San Francisco?

I was born in Pasadena, but we moved to the Bay Area when I was nine months old. In terms of museums that formulated, shaped or exposed me to art, it was SFMOMA. Having said that, I did see the first King Tut exhibition at LACMA in the '70s.


Was there anything about growing up in the Bay Area that continues to influence your work today?

I grew up in Marin, and I'm sure being in the redwoods and fresh air was probably good for me. I played baseball.


Were there any artists who were influential to you growing up? What about California artists like Robert Irwin or John McLaughlin?

In my late 20s, McLaughlin became important to me because he made rigorous abstractions and was the first California artist to break out and have an international career. But I read Kandinsky's Concerning the Spiritual In Art at age 15, I liked Paul Klee, and looked at my grandfather's books on Picasso.




Untitled-(three-tiered-perspective)-1997.jpg

Mark Grotjahn, Unititled (Three-Tiered-Perspective), 1997


Is the work that you make in California different than the work in New York?

No, it is exactly the same.


I read that the work you made coming out of school was based in performance art. Are there lessons or insights that you experienced making performance that still inform your work today?

Yes, I always believed that art could be whatever you wanted it to be. But actually doing an interactive, social performance or intervention showed me that that was actually a reality.


How did the butterfly paintings and drawings come about? For me, they have a remarkable tension between these flat colored triangle shapes and a collapsing one-point perspective. It is like a geometric colored field painting and fractured renaissance perspective at the same time. It destroys and rebuilds the perspective in the same moment.

At the time I had just moved to L.A. and I had been doing conceptual performance work in the Bay Area. I opened a gallery with my friend Brent Peterson and started showing and working with other artists. That took care of a lot of my conceptual needs as well as feeling connected to a larger community. And I started to think about why I got into art in the first place. I was always interested in line and color. I wanted to find a motif that I could experiment with for awhile. I did a group of drawings over a period of six to twelve months. The drawing that I chose was one that resembled the three tier perspective, and that is what I went with.




Mark-Grotjahn-Untitled-(colored-butterfly-white-background-6-wings)-2004.jpg

Mark Grotjahn, Untitled (Colored Butterfly White Background 6 Wings), 2004


Sometimes in your work the focal points of the radiating lines are close together and other times they are far a part. Each creates a different type of space. When the focal points are close to each other the lines almost create a coherent perspective. When they are far apart, it is like they are almost two different spaces that have been collaged together. When did you realize that the placement of the focal point of the lines could contain such powerful spatial ideas?

Originally I had no interest in perspective and I don't know that the work does contain those powerful ideas. I changed the focal points because it changed the composition of the works and found that it was visually interesting and worthwhile.


How do you decide on the colors that you use in your work? The work currently on view at the Portland Art Museum is all black and is from your exhibition Dancing Black Butterflies at Gagosian. The black is incredibly deep and rich, always bringing your eye back to the surface. How did you know that the black would work as well as the colors?

I had done one black dancing butterfly before this series. I looked at an image of it and thought it would be interesting to do one at a large scale. I did it, it worked and I decided then to do a series. Halfway through, I realized they would be kept together and that it would be the end of the color dancing butterflies.


When you are thinking about a new series of works, do you work out the series before hand in sketches or drawings, or does the process of the work evolve over time?

Evolve over time, rarely a sketch or drawing leads to a painting.


Despite all of the loaded art history connotations, when I look at your work with the faces I am often reminded of tribal art, especially the faces. For me, the eyes and the mouths often seem dislocated, floating above the space of the work. It reminds me of looking into a forest and seeing eyes looking back at you. While your work is certainly coming out of a different place, were you ever inspired by African or Oceanic tribal art? How did those pieces with the faces come about?

I like the description of the eyes coming out of the jungle. I sometimes pretend the faces are baboons or monkeys. I can't say I've been influenced by African art particularly or consciously except that I've been influenced by artists who have been influenced. Picasso being the most obvious.




Untitled-(Face-742),-2007.jpg

Mark Grotjahn, Untitled(Face 742), 2007


In the Butterfly paintings, the center lines often seem to be diagonals that create trapezoids rather than being parallel to one another or perpendicular to the edges of the canvas. This seems to create a slight instability that allows radiating lines to create more space in the painting. If the lines had been parallel or perpendicular, they also probably would have been relatively inert and created more of a frame or a hard boundary. The diagonal lines in the middle of the canvas also avoid direct references to artists like Barnett Newman and John McLaughlin. How did you develop it in the course of your work? What problems were you trying to solve?

I think you are right about the space that is created. The horizontal and vertical lines are rarely, if ever, horizontal or perpendicular to the edges of the canvas. I think it throws the works slightly off kilter. I was interested in that with the three tiered perspectives. I wanted to throw your body slightly off without making it super manipulative. The butterfly paintings not so much, and they seem to get tighter and more regimented. With this suite of black drawings the only problems I was trying to solve were visual ones. I wanted the works to move. It's why I called them "dancing butterflies". Dancing refers to music, and music to some of the abstract pioneers.




Untitled-(Green-Butterfly-M.-Grotjahn-03-145),-2003.jpg

Mark Grotjahn, Untitled (Green Butterfly), 2003


Posted by Arcy Douglass on October 06, 2010 at 14:42 | Comments (0)


Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee