Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Interior Margins: A Question of Language
Artist | Architect John Holmes
Monday links
Weekend Goings On
Interior Margins Conversation II
Sandra Percival leaves YU
10th NW Biennial at Tacoma Art Museum Opens
Tina to Williams
Memory and Anonymous
Monday Links
Lupification at Archer Gallery
Op Ed

recent comments



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Friday 12.09.11

« Interior Margins conversation | Main | Monday musings »

Friday links

Well, the art world's still in the predictable post ABMB entertainment/money confluence backlash mode but as I pointed out just before the East Coast/Saatchi started publishing screeds... it really does matter how the artist and institutions lay the ground rules (Alfredo Jaar requires carte blanche). Here's the latest:

Anselm Kiefer (sometimes one of my favorite artists) believes art is, "not entertainment." Well he's right when it comes to his art, but there is certainly room for entertainment in art... for example Paul McCarthy's and Richard Serra's sheer audacity is entertaining. By simply suspending the humdrum of the everyday an artist can create big A "Art". In Kiefer's case he's working within an exceedingly serious historical discussion and his show at Tate Modern along with the New Clifford Still Museum are foregrounding a much needed counterpoint to the sometimes grating follies of art. I like to think of it as very responsible "older brother art". Maybe I'm just projecting... I am the oldest in my family so; Still, Judd, Newman, Serra, Martin and Kiefer all appeal to my "seriousness" fetish. Which isnt to say I don't enjoy classic Damien Hirst, Murakami, Tracey Emin and Jason Rhoades as art brats who fulfilled the need to laugh a little bit at how we fetish seriousness/higher aspirations.

Linda Yablonsky addresses the Miami hangover directly.

Edward Winkleman addresses Yablonsky and does a nice job of discussing the 99% and the influence of money. Though I think he's wrong about the naming rights superseding the work that director's do in the history books. For example if the Menil's can't overshadow Walter Hopps legacy in the history books... then no one can! At the Portland Art Museum both the current Robert J. Pamplin Director Brian Ferriso and his predecessor John Buchanan are discussed a lot more as watershed arts leaders than the man who endowed their position and he owns a newspaper! Perhaps that's why Eli Broad wanted Jeffrey Dietch? Whatever other complications exist he's one of the few people Broad can't overshadow. If a director is overshadowed by a patron, it means the director just isn't all that noteworthy or innovative. If anything the patrons today are less noteworthy than they were in the recent past, which possibly is lowering the bar for some directorships?

In Portland Art Museum news the same anonymous donor who funded a temporary curator of photography position has fully endowed it with a 2 million dollar gift. Great news but because I am a scold there is a HUGE lesson worth repeating. If this is a jaw dropping bit of philanthropy for other Portland art institutions to comprehend... it isn't. Yes it is noteworthy but the gift happened because PAM has had a very clear institutional plan where a patron can see how the institution is growing up and deepening its commitments. Rather than some shot in the dark the funding was an inevitability, which then asks specific patrons to step up. PAM has a wish list of other endowment opportunities here. You see, when other Portland institutions are purposefully difficult to comprehend, major gifts become incomprehensible. The argument that institutions have failed because of physical plant costs is only partly true... in the case of PAM, PNCA, Bluesky, Cooley Gallery at Reed, Hoffman Gallery at L&C, OCAC, Newspace and even the Museum of Contemporary Craft improving and owning their spaces (while simultaneously doubling down on programs) has forced the issue with patrons to find a way to save things they love. It's simply tough to love or even make a case for saving that which is standing still and not developing. Being elusive is not a good idea for any major funding initiative. I know the money itself is more meaningful to some other publications but the how and why here are much more important.

Posted by Jeff Jahn on December 09, 2011 at 12:09 | Comments (0)


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee