Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

End of October links
All Hallows Picks
Mid October links and news
Weekend Picks: domestic edition
First Thursday October 2017 Picks
Weekend Picks
Vancouver Arts Summit Video
Artist Opportunities
September quandries
Interview with Jennifer Steinkamp
Bill Will at Lewis and Clark College
First Thursday Picks September 2017

recent comments

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Tuesday 10.27.15

« Weekend Picks | Main | Save the Coliseum »

Substantial Links

The Walker Art Center was nice enough to publish Alexander Blauvelt's catalog essay for their Hippie Modernism exhibition titled Aesthetic Radicalism. It brings up a number of good points though I think the dichotomy he makes between minimalism/formalism and psychedelic art are an unsustainable argument. For example, Smithson was obsessed with Judd's crystaline fragmentation and Judd's own love of John Wesley and Claes Oldenburg's work undermines his argument's premise. He is right in that the art market, most historians and museums did separate them. Hopefully, this exhibition will help break down some of the very bad art history done on so called minimalism the 1960's and 70's. This is the sort of design/art aesthetic/societal movement show we should see in Portland more often too... I curated this show last year.

Artinfo asks if can single venue galleries survive? Good question... answer of course is no. Gallerists must mix and show outside their brick and mortar spaces, art fairs are crucial but oversaturated so choosing the right one or two matters tremendously. The real question is how do you develop a brand and following? Certainly, off site exhibitions and some fairs are a good idea. It is a question of exposure. There is also the question of the kind of art that is easy to share on Instagram and that which is next to impossible to share. Those two modalities are more valuable today but the stuff that falls in between gets hit by the bus that is today's art consumers who either want the very quick or the very slow experience.

Hyperallergic tears painter Josh Smith a new one... not completely underevedly either but it is wrongheaded because Smith is working on something interesting... weakened painting till it is potential sculpture. Still, this sort of review is a kind of honor and they did see merit in a few works. Overall, it isn't a linear thinking dismissal of the work, simply one that matches expectations to what is presented. I think the work isn't terrible but it does remind me why I love Cy Twombly... that's the real takeaway. The work feels like it isn't well rooted, trading pot ashes for trees as it were. The value isn't that the review is necessarily correct but in that his next exhibition and new bodies of work might correct or further heighten this rootlessness in his work so it achieves something stronger. That's why negative reviews are so important, it also means the critic thinks the artist can take it. It is in a way a character test for the artist, gallery, collectors and institutions. If you have character you don't mind having it challenged a bit.

Jen Graves' piece on Paul Allen is a must read but it suffers from the general anxiety Seattle always seems to have over its major art patrons. LA has the same problem with Eli Broad but Allen is special because he's a tech guy. One reason the tech and art world's rarely intersect is tech people like to geek out on very particular details. To art people who by and large follow trends established in the art world this search for obscure/disruptive new trends to create a pet project seems impulsive or capricious but it isn't. Tech people have an edge and for whatever reason most of the art world doesn't have something similar because they do a lot of navel gazing (they follow a particular gallery or style of art and look at CV's first). So, dPaul Allen doesn't surprise me at all. Dealing with foundations and large non profits tends to create situations where things become predictable and dull, it is the way patrons are groomed. Museums and other major non profits are in flux but have always placed too much emphasis on predictable funding sources, which in turn makes them predictable programmatically (understandable but often dull). I've always found that idiomatic individuals... and their whims are what keep cultures reinvigorated. Conversely, most major museums would take a check half as large if they could count on it for 5-10 years in a row. From a museum director standpoint that makes sense but doesn't generate the inspired chaos that being a little more hungry can. It forces one to reach for more than had been considered before. I'm very curios how Allen's Pivot program will play out as well... very little of the art world actually considers how the mind works and putting art and science in such close proximity might be what the art world needs. Maybe it is because I'm a longstanding tech guy myself that loves guitars, sci-fi, art and science too... but I can see why Allen wants to periodically try a new way of interfacing with the public he's still young enough to be looking for the best way for his money and interests to have an effect. He's clearly working on it, and that is a very good thing... it seems personal, not the "just cut a check" way that a lot of patrons participate. Maybe it is the historian in me that can see past the money... remember MoMA, the Menil, the Guggenheim all started essentially from the seemingly capricious and very idiomatic interests of their founding patrons.

Last but not least Brian Libby applauds the city council's decision to renovate the historic Portland Building. The trick will be to get the right architect as most harbor a deep seeded antipathy towards postmodern architecture. Renovations are challenging and they should preserve the way the elevators look as well as the crazy columned indoor gallery devoted to the Portlandia sculpture atop the building. I'd also design a better more inviting space for RACC's highly successful art gallery in the building. Most everything else floorplan-wise can be rethought and a few light wells + modern mechanicals will greatly improve the building, which will need to be essentially gutted and rebuilt.

Posted by Jeff Jahn on October 27, 2015 at 10:36 | Comments (0)


Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee