Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Resist: Inauguration at Una Gallery
Early February links
First Thursday Picks February 2017
Dead tree media & dead horse flogging news
Post Snowpocalypse Weekend Picks
More Disjecta'd
New Year opportunities
Monday Integrity Links
First Thursday Picks January 2017
Jason Berlin + Alanna Risse at Rainmaker
Saying goodby to 2016
Mid December Links

recent comments

SimEnzo

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Thursday 01.25.07

« A Distinguished Guest: Clyfford Still at PAM | Main | Some small scale shows you may have missed »

Glitter and Doom at the Met

Before taking in Glitter and Doom: German Portraits from the 1920s, I visited another of the Metropolitan Museum of Art's current special exhibitions, Americans in Paris.

Sargent_Daughters_Boit.L.jpg
John Singer Sargent
The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit, 1882
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

There, among the paintings of elegant Parisians lounging and strolling, I found the four melancholy daughters of Edward Darley Boit. John Singer Sargent's fluid brushwork transforms the sisters' simple white aprons into dazzling confections, at the same time revealing the vulnerability underlying their awkward poses. There are few other paintings so touched with darkness and anxiety in Americans in Paris. Americans found Paris shimmering and painted it that way, with sunlight bouncing off silk dresses and rippling water at every turn.

The two special exhibitions are appropriately situated; upon leaving Americans in Paris, visitors must descend the Met's great staircase in order to enter the hellish Glitter and Doom. Whores, cripples, profiteers and junkies populate this dismal world. Grey-skinned and dead-eyed, they look like zombified versions of the bon vivants of Americans in Paris.

During the Weimar Era, the interwar period between 1919 and 1933, Germany filled with the living half-dead. Many soldiers returned from war scarred, crippled and missing limbs. Many men were unreparable, and their widows were left to fend for themselves and their children. For some war widows, prostitution--and the emotional numbness that made that profession bearable--was the only option.

08_Dix_The Salon I.L.jpg
Otto Dix
The Salon I, 1921
Kunstmuseum Stuttgart

As World War I ended, Germany underwent a revolution. The German monarchy was stripped of its power, which was transferred to the Parliament. The new democratic government faced myriad difficulties, among them the heavy war reparations demanded by the victorious Allied Powers. The German government attempted to handle this debt by simply printing more money, an ill-considered strategy which soon resulted in hyperinflation. In 1920, a loaf of bread cost 2 Deutschmarks. By June of 1923, a loaf of bread cost 430,000,000,000 Deutschmarks.

While it may have looked like hell, Weimar Era Germany was more akin to purgatory. Freed of a monarchy, the country was in the process of reinventing itself. Obscenity laws were lifted, resulting in unprecedented freedom of expression. But the optimism inspired by this new freedom was undercut by the horrors of war and a chaotic economy. It was under these dire circumstances that Adolph Hitler eventually rose to power, offering a "final solution." Hitler sought to purge Germany of the "degenerate art" created by the major figures in Glitter and Doom as well as the bold formal designs of the contemporary Bauhaus movement and modernist artwork of any stripe.

It's not hard to see why Hitler felt threatened by Verism, the movement to which the Glitter and Doom artists belonged. The more experimental branch of a movement referred to as Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity--literally, "new dispassion"),Verism was the antithesis of the sterile, morally straightforward world imagined by the Nazis. Rawly expressionistic and antiauthoritarian, Verist artists frequently depicted their sitters as "types," representatives of the German social landscape.

03_Dix_Alfred Flechtheim.L.jpg
Otto Dix
The Art Dealer Alfred Flechtheim, 1926
Neue Nationalgalerie, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Preußischer Kulturbesitz

Perhaps Hitler could have found something to like in Otto Dix's depiction of the Jewish art dealer Alfred Flechtheim, an uncommissioned portrait that reduces this sophisticated art lover to a dull, petty hawker of goods. Dix had a personal beef with Flechtheim and the portrait seems to have been inspired entirely by spite. Dix wasn't anti-Semitic; he had many Jewish friends, whom he painted with equal savagery. Dix destroyed the good looks of everyone he painted, excepting himself and his wife.

After enthusiastically signing up at the age of 23, Dix went on to spend more time in the War than any of the other prominent Verists. His art is rawer and sharper than the work of most of his contemporaries, several of whom suffered nervous breakdowns on the front or avoided the war altogether. Dix's brilliance lay in his ability to crystallize and channel his rage into hallucinatory yet blunt paintings that seethe with compromised life. The quintessential Verist, Dix has far more works in Glitter and Doom than any other artist, and his vision sets the tone for the exhibition.

Glitter and Doom contains a large, well-chosen selection of drawings by major figures of Verism, which offer multiple revelations about each of these artists. The Dream of the Sadist I is a scene of gleeful mutilation that pushes Dix's horrific paradigm to a new level. On the other end of the spectrum, his beautiful Head of a Girl is startling for its calm delicacy, so unlike anything else in Dix's oeuvre.

Dix's dystopia-dwellers bear a close relationship to the the figures painted by George Grosz. Both painters portrayed archetypes with distorted features in works with a sinister tone. The condensed depth of field and collage-like compositions used by both men point to the influence of Cubist space and Dada incongruity.

10_Grosz_Grey Day.L.jpg
George Grosz
Gray Day, 1921
Neue Nationalgalerie, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

While Grosz and Dix shared extremely passionate temperaments, their ideologies were quite different. Dix believed that all of life was guided by a creative/destructive cyclical force. He sought intense experience of all kinds and the brutality of his images came primarily out of a simple desire to capture life honestly. Grosz was an extremely idealistic and critical man who, even before the war, had been planning to complete a three volume book on the ugliness of Germans. His multi-figure compositions in Glitter and Doom were made during a period in which Grosz strongly identified with Communist ideals, and they were made as explicitly political statements. Later, a trip to Communist Russia left Grosz disillusioned and he turned almost entirely to landscape painting. One of the best portraits in Glitter and Doom shows the writer Max Herrmann-Neisse in a relatively straightforward painting by Grosz. This dignified portrait of his misshapen friend is a neat inversion of the Verist tendency to distort and savage subjects.

11_Grosz_The Writer Max Herrmann Neisse.L.jpg
George Grosz
The Writer Max Herrmann-Neisse, 1925
Städtische Kunsthalle, Mannheim

Max Beckman's featured paintings of women are beautiful, calm and formally rigorous in a way that seems slightly out of place in this exhibition. His painted self-portraits are another story; I rate them among the best created by any artist, ever and was disappointed to find only two in Glitter and Doom. Beckmann also created large multi-panel paintings of the horrors of war that are among the most impressive works from the 1920s. While these works are not "portraiture" they share a closer relationship to many of Grosz's included paintings than the Beckmann portraits that were chosen for Glitter and Doom. The Verists did such a thorough job of complicating the very idea of "portraiture" that the theme of "German portraits in the 1920s" must have presented a wide range of curatorial dilemmas.

01_Beckmann_Self-Portrait with glass of champagne.L.jpg
Max Beckmann
Self-Portrait with Champagne Glass, 1919
Private collection, courtesy W. Wittrock, Berlin

Christian Schad, who sat out the war in Switzerland, comes closest to literally living up to the idea of objectivity and dispassion implied by the Neue Sachlichkeit name. His smooth, weary creatures seem to exist perpetually in the waning hours of a strange party. Schad was enamored with Renaissance masters, and his work shows traces of the influence of Raphael.

15_Schad_The Count St Genois dAnneaucourt.L.jpg
Christian Schad
Count St. Genois d'Anneaucourt, 1927
Centre Georges Pompidou, Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris

These four artists are the most prominent in Glitter and Doom, which also features work by Karl Hubbuch, Rudolph Schlichter, Ludwig Meidner and several others. While a few of the omissions and inclusions are questionable, the exhibition as a whole does a thorough job of shedding light on one of the most fascinating cultural moments in recent history.


Posted by Jessica Bromer on January 25, 2007 at 7:33 | Comments (1)


Comments

"Glitter and Doom" is one of the most powerful shows I've seen. As the title implies, it delves into a realm of conflicting emotions. I think summing it up as a show that sheds light on a "fascinating cultural moment" does not do justice to the sheer impact & universality it contains. These are not dead, dusty paintings; these are paintings that reach out and viscerally grab you.

On a more intellectual level, I was quite struck by the relationship between Grosz and his subjects... as the placards explained, his patrons were very supportive of his efforts to the point of sitting for what they knew were going to be very unflattering/disturbing portraits.

Posted by: SimEnzo [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 25, 2007 02:51 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee