Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

China redefines farce
Open Engagement 2011 conference at PSU
Storm Tharp in the lumber room
The Score 2: space to grow
artist opportunities
First Weekend Picks May 2011
First Thursday Picks May 2011
TBA Visual Arts 2011
Bruce High Quality Foundation: Teach 4 Amerika
Act for Japan
Low Lives
"You'll Never Walk Alone", A Testimony of Creative Community, at Worksound

recent comments

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Jenene Nagy
Jascha Owens
Ryan Pierce
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Tuesday 04.05.11

« art school openings | Main | Sound Moves in Color: Nick Cave at SAM »

No Painting Left Behind at Rocksbox

NPLB_from_behind_sm.jpg
Painting by Erin Allen, Keith Broadwee and Issac Gray at Rocksbox

With seventeen paintings from the collaborative efforts of Erin Allen, Keith Broadwee and Issac Gray on the first floor, and another eight (one multi-panel) by the Icelandic group Gotulist i bjorg kassi!, on the smaller, second floor of Rocksbox, ecstatic enthusiasm is evidenced in the sheer number of loose, almost haphazard pieces. Think a two-dimensional version of Paul McCarthy’s “Painter” or “Family Tyranny” without the suggestiveness his props provide. Envision very literal scatology and sacrilege that comes from more sophomoric, if equally troubling subject matter of the master.

NPLB_up_corner_sm.jpg
Install view: Icelandic group Gotulist i bjorg kassi!

NPLBH_install2_sm.jpg
Install view of paintings by Erin Allen, Keith Broadwee and Issac Gray

Exhibiting these two groups together is stylistically appropriate. However, to say that the two floors of Rocksbox Contemporary contain paintings of exuberant immaturity is incomplete without remarking that the paintings themselves are purposefully atrocious. Yet again, in all that such a white-wall ed setting implies, one hardly expects to see depictions of pissing and shitting in such plentitude, so the paintings manage to maintain some level of impact, and to this degree, they are successful. They are not unlike the synaesthesia one might experience in the bedroom of a pouty young male as his demeanor takes on a sardonic glee with the arrival of an audience of several like-minded collaborators. Then someone makes a television show of this scene and calls it “The Kippenbergers.” Each week’s episode is a reworking of the same theme : the kids pull another fast one on their oblivious and stultified parents. It’s something we recognize as part and parcel of the situation comedies that proliferate on American TV but are expected to watch and embrace as our own. Serious art = bad; bad art = too smart to care. Even the equation is banal, but we ‘get’ it, and therefore it is reinforcing... comforting.

NPLB_Brown_sm.jpg
by Erin Allen, Keith Broadwee and Issac Gray

Mimicking Paul McCarthy and Martin Kippenberger, or drawing superheroes and nekked women, does have a place in the development of many young male artists, but the artists at Rocksbox seem too old to be written off as young reprobates defacing textbooks or scribbling on their notebook covers. And in that they are presented in a gallery of some alternative esteem, I feel it is incumbent to find a way to move beyond their circle jerk of angst cum guffaw. In other words, what am I missing?

NPLB_Up_sm.jpg
Install view of Icelandic group painting

Initially, the cavalier method with which the paint has been applied to canvas, coupled with the untoward subject matter of the work by both groups, allows one to be dismissive, but there is a difference in their approaches that make for subtle shifts in a viewer’s demeanor moving between floors. It is by reading the artists’ statements that we begin to garner more clues. Both groups use the word ‘primal’ to describe their approach to painting. For the former group, it is the primal scream via “sex and drugs and rock and roll and life and death and nature.” Everything is up for grabs and refinement is leaving a pretty corpse. Forever young. For the Icelandic collaborators, it is the “gist of” meconium (the fetal feces of the newborn, and a word with an etymology suggesting poppies). Whether or not actual meconium is used (as it is intimated), it nonetheless is the metaphor for the primal first shit (Shit. To say the word feels good.) that represents the world before separation from the womb and the bringing of inevitable pain thereafter. One should start painting at birth, for therein one will find liberation. Spreading paint serves to ease the pain. Fuck the viewer/parent.

Still, if we entertain the notion that the artists’ are being sincere when they state a primal need to make these paintings, then, at least according to Arthur Janov, the founder of primal therapy, there is a real purpose to purging one’s pain and suffering (a pain that begins to accumulate at birth, and in other fields of psychology would be associated with a separation anxiety, or, as in psychoanalysis, lack and desire) in such a demonstrative manner, with no social constraints. Anything less, perpetuates (arguably inescapable) suffering. There is a real sense of exploring this pain upstairs, and following this line, it is a wonder there are not a lot more paintings. Downstairs is more of a debauch, and while certainly not timid, it feels like the artists are attempting to be spectacularly transgressive, indeed, the Bad Boys of Taboo. Crying for attention... love.

Depending on whom you talk to, the attempts at efficiency and efficacy of our nation’s No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has either standardized, and therefore streamlined, the education of our youth in the public schools, or stultified individuality into a bland commonality. One of the main complaints against the governments’ (both state and federal) regarding the No Child Left Behind is that the states set their own standards, and therefore the bar can be set at such a level to guarantee that all but the most hopelessly lost students make the grade. The schools remain funded while mediocrity becomes as an aspiration. (After all, ours is a service economy.)

In that questions of a desired effect versus potential remain throughout that bureaucratic process, the current exhibit at Rocksbox makes much the same mistake. In short, and in the spirit of the exhibit, how might the artists avoid appearing as if the rule of thumb is an ebullient purge of said appendage to a nose with another like digit as butt plug? As it stands, it is difficult to determine whether the ensuing mayhem is liberating or nothing more than an exclamation of a resolute, reactionary alienation masked as an enduring communion of intent. Is this a case of acting out a manifesto that demands either a much younger or more accepting audience that doesn’t have to first consider and get past a lower common denominator; and if this is indeed the point, to what end? How does the recognition of a purgative drive through debased imagery and painting styles give rise to compassion or appreciation within the viewer?

So many questions, when all the artists might be trying to say is that the world has been and continues to be on its way to hell in a hand basket. If so, it seems too simple, just like the paintings, and the only recourse then is to wonder if, even hope, the painting process provided some emotional relief for these artists.

Posted by Patrick Collier on April 05, 2011 at 8:28 | Comments (0)


Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee