Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Giving Thanks Readings
Meet RACC's new leader Madison Cario
November Reviews
Early November Links
Spooky reviews
Countdown to Portlandageddon?
Mid October Links including PNCA/OCAC merger talks
Paul Allen, philanthropist and arts champion dead at 65
Midwest Art Initiative Tour
Haunting October Picks
End of September News
September review cluster

recent comments



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Thursday 03.12.09

« Tim Colley @ Rocksbox | Main | Talkin' »

Bridging design issues

New cable stay/suspension combo bridge proposal

I've been wrestling with this new cable stay suspension bridge hybrid across the Willamette River for several weeks now and the designs went public last week. Im not exactly excited about this design but it's an intriguing alternative to the two pure cable stayed designs, both of which seem generic. Still, the effectiveness of the design varies depending on the view.

detail of hybrid bridge

In profile from the middle of the riverr it looks very european and elegant, except that's not how most would experience the bridge.

From atop the bridge as a pedestrian or rider, the design starts to really fall apart. The sense of verticality seems truncated or stubby, more like a pier on the esplanade than a bridge. Some cross members or a more triangular set of towers would help create a greater aspirational sense of verticality. It also doesnt have enough mass to fill out the scale and harmonize the proportions. It simply looks underbuilt.

This hybrid design is supposedly designed to conjure Portland's excellent St Johns Bridge (above) but it lacks the gothic cathedral-like emphasis on the vertical. The St Johns Bridge is the second best bridge design on the west coast, beaten out only by the Golden Gate, the most recognizable bridge on the planet.

The bridge architect Miguel Rosales seems willing to entertain different tower designs like the one above (it's a little too busy but I like the diamond form and the two prongs). Frankly, trying to further ape the St Johns bridge design doesn't make sense to me; it needs more of its own personality. In fact I feel a straight clean cable stay design, without the suspension might be a lot less cluttered, and in my mind CS4 is still the best overall design visually. It competes with the horrible Marquam Bridge and makes a very decisive break with other Willamette bridges.

Portland Architecture did a good job discussing this bridge design as well and this hybrid doesn't seem to tickle the architectural community yet. How do PORT's art and design readers feel?

The height of CS4 or CS2 option isn't such a big deal, being taller than the Marquam Bridge but lower than the downtown skyscrapers is a fine statement to make for the first major US city to build a devoted light rail pedestrian bridge. Would it be very unique no, but CS4 type bridges are exciting when lit at night. Since CS4 is less expensive than the others what if more money were spent on the pedestrian and cycling details?

Example of some hastilly altered "less pointy" CS2 towers

Also, can we see some better tower designs for CS2 and CS4? For example, towers of CS2 design would be improved if were not so pointy, which competes with Mt. Hood's pyramidal profile and looks hokey in a cut rate Jetsons way.

Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge... not great but way better than CS2

Another example, the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge in South Carolina creates a better sense of heighened accomplishment. Bridges, especially Portland bridges are closely linked to civic pride.

North Arm bridge in Canada

Still these designs for Portland are all much better than the new North Arm pedestrian / rail bridge over the Frasier River in Canada, which seems way too stubby with a chunky deck (this is a heavy rail bridge, not light rail like ours).

Hybrid bridge's pedestrian details

I also feel the pedestrian and bike access areas are dull and uninspired on all three options. Though, having the cable stays between the light rail and the pedestrian/bike lanes as on the new hybrid or the wave frame design is superior to CS4's design where there is less separation.

Lastly, the deep grey color is hardly exciting when considering Portland's frequently grey skies.

Wave frame design, no longer under consideration

The previous wave frame design has been eliminated due to cost of steel overrun concerns. Though it was my favorite of the 4 designs we've seen I really didn't think it was extraordinary enough a design to justify the risks.

Still CS4 is the cleanest design of the bunch (probably because similar designs have been refined over an over again). It is the cheapest of the three options but its four piers impact the Willamette River's environment the most.
Also, to echo what others have said design quality is a "practical" decision... as the Marquam has already taught us.

The US goes through binges and purges of infrastructure spending... so we need to build the best possible projects during this coming infrastructure binge. The St Johns Bridge was massively overbuilt but it is a masterpiece worth having. The Freemont is pretty good too.

I'd like to think this new span can at least rival the Freemont. So far it doesn't, and its aspirational correlations to the St. Johns Bridge... especially at the pedestrian experience level aren't even close to being realized, yet.

My sense is Rosales is looking for support to get the details right. Right now they aren't.

Lastly this Willamette span is kind of a dress rehearsal for the Columbia River crossing. My sense is that process has gotten caught up in red herring issues like the number of lanes ...as if the # of lanes is the decisive factor in how green that bridge can be. I think that project needs an architect at this point and Sam Adams can paradoxically take a more assertive role by delegating it to the people who professionally field all of the competing needs and desires such bridges present... architects. A design competition inviting major architects like, Zaha Hadid, Santiago Calatrava, MVRDV and UN Studio (who lost the Aerial Tram design competition), Foreign Office Architects etc. would be good as it would give the public concrete examples and begin to really look at what a 21st century bridge could be.

Or maybe Portland's own Brad Cloepfil needs his first major bridge? In PORT's 2-part interview with him we found out his CAM St. Louis project was actually based on a bridge idea.

If this Willamette span project has taught us anything it's that the level of architect has a major impact on the finished product. Rosales is good but not first tier and the designs bear that out. A starchitect is all about pushing people to demand more. If Portland wants to seriously back up Sam Adams claims of, "A better bridge," he's going to have to get a pretty damn good architect and it will likely define his political future. With a 4+ billion dollar budget the Columbia River Crossing has room in the budget for innovatI've design (I've discussed this all before).

What I'm seeing from the Willamette Bridge options are incremental refinements or nice bridges, not terribly innovative ones.

Posted by Jeff Jahn on March 12, 2009 at 9:23 | Comments (0)


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee