Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Early September Links
Labor Day Weekend Picks
Museumy Links
Wendy Given at Vernissage
Mid August Links
Grace Kook-Anderson in Conversation
Portland Art Adventures
Early August Art News
August must see picks
End of July News
Alia Ali's Borderland at Bluesky
Mid Summer Reads

recent comments

Double J
Calvin Carl



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Saturday 05.27.06

« Last Weekend for you to PMU | Main | The School of Panamerican Unrest »

Roxy Paine's PMU


Roxy Paine PMU (Painting Manufacture Unit) 1999-2000.
Aluminum, stainless steel, computer, electronics, motors, pump, valves, acrylic, Courtesy of the artist and James Cohan Gallery, New York.

Function finds little room in contemporary art, a realm where dysfunction, tension and absurdity operate best. While Roxy Paine's automatic art-making machine—the Painting Manufacture Unit, or PMU on view through Sunday at the Portland Art Museum—could easily fall prey to the cynicism inherent the task of automating the creative process, its functionality saves it from merely becoming an exercise in pure critique.

Paine's PMU is part of a series of flawlessly-built art-making machines that include a Drawing Machine, several SCUMAK (Auto Sculpture) machines and an Erosion Machine. Constructed with an industrial scale and durability, the PMU is built to produce unique, vaguely Abstract Expressionistic canvases. At regular intervals, a red warning light flashes, signaling the start of each painting cycle. A large robotic arm spews white paint in a neatly choreographed trajectory from left to right towards a canvas dangling from the center of a large network of stainless steel frames, tubes and vats. Each layer is allowed a long drying period before the cycle begins again. The finished paintings, which take dozens of cycles and approximately 3 weeks to complete, are completely bare at the top, revealing raw brown canvas. Thickly layered stratas of white paint build up at the bottom of the canvas, forming thick, sculptural mounds of paint that hang off of the surface like stalactites, reminiscent of Paine's other body of work consisting of hyper-realistic sculptures of natural forms.

Paine's PMU is part of a lineage of art-generating machines that date back at least as far as Jean Tinguely's mid-century contraptions. But most are premised on an underlying skepticism of machines or a strong critique of the politics of the art market. Rebecca Horn's kinetic painting machine, entitled "the Little Painting School Performs a Waterfall," is in essence a logical step from her wearable forms and performances, using purely mechanical elements to mimic painterly action. The machine is crude and functions as an inadequate surrogate for nature and the human action of painting rather than as a machine for production. The lesser known drawing machine of British artist Harold Cohen, which dates back to the early 1980s, is based on similar, if more scientific and statistical, attempts to capture artistic gesture, using a combination of artificial intelligence, sophisticated software and customized hardware. Wim Delvoye's recent Cloaca, which is most similar to Paine's PMU in terms of its flawless, industrial-grade construction, does not produce traditional art forms, but instead employs a complex network of mechanics and chemicals to mimic human digestion. The scatological output of this process is sealed, packaged and sold as art.

While there is some degree of absurdity in the very notion of creating an automatic painting machine, Paine's machine differentiates itself because it not only delivers a thrilling performance, but a surprisingly convincing end product. While the tongue-in-cheek nature of his work cannot be missed (Paine even includes an ashtray and beer holder for the imaginary machine operator that is conspicuously absent), Paine carefully sidesteps clear answers to the line of questioning that his painting machine prompts. One can certainly find human-esque behavior in everything from the periodic pauses the machine makes in between "strokes" to the mock-gestural qualities of the paint. But Paine has not created this machine simply to imperfectly mimic human actions nor has he created a machine that obliterates the need for human creation. Paine obviously mocks the masculine gesture of Abstract Expressionism, but the resulting pieces seem less critical than seductive and fashionable. Paine points the way towards a line of questioning about the creative act, market value, and mass production, but at the same time goes to great lengths to improve both his process and his machines. Paine may leave the door open for the viewer to pursue a critique of the art world, but perhaps more importantly engages an uncritical fascination with mechanics and the very nature of the basic processes of creation itself.

Through Sunday, May 28th
Portland Art Museum • 1219 SW Park Avenue • 503.226.2811

Posted by Katherine Bovee on May 27, 2006 at 22:45 | Comments (2)


I can't help but consistently think of wonderful artists such as Thomas Kinkade when I view this piece. Man, I tell you, if there is ever a contest for the best painter in the history of man, the "Painter of Light" will crush all opposition!

Posted by: Calvin Carl [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 29, 2006 03:03 PM

I consider PMU his most important work and you can see how its construction lead him to the stainless steel trees. One thing that I liked about chatting with Paine was his emphasis on machine time as compared to human time and geological time. It has none of the menace of Tinguely's work (early modernism wasn't always hopeful about machines and their effect upon our lives) and I like how it conflates a literal take on Warhol's POP factory with the abstract expressionsists while churning out geological features. The machine is hilarious to boot.

Paine is essentialy an artist interested in the confluence of time and material as mediated both by the viewer and the artist's expectations. With this machine both the viewer and artist get to view the creation of paintings at the same time, breaking down the studio barrier.

Still the creation of the machine that created the paintngs was a more private affair between Roxy and his materials (and research).

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 29, 2006 03:11 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee