Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Resist: Inauguration at Una Gallery
Early February links
First Thursday Picks February 2017
Dead tree media & dead horse flogging news
Post Snowpocalypse Weekend Picks
More Disjecta'd
New Year opportunities
Monday Integrity Links
First Thursday Picks January 2017
Jason Berlin + Alanna Risse at Rainmaker
Saying goodby to 2016
Mid December Links

recent comments

Faure
ST
Faure
rosenak
Christopher Buckingham

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Tuesday 08.23.11

« Two Worlds = Same Universe | Main | Last Thursday August 2011 »

Defending Beauty?

Cloud_gate1_sm.jpg
Anish Kapoor's Cloud Gate in Chicago (photo Jeff Jahn)

Tomorrow at Place the latest Praxis salon discussion presents Jason Brown's Paper "In the Defense of Beauty: The Guise and The Intangible." Grant Hottle's paintings will be on display as well.

Beauty was a hot topic in the mid 90's when Dave Hickey challenged the decades long bias against it in contemporary art with his essay, The Invisible Dragon: Four Essays on Beauty. It was essentially an all out and ultimately successful attack on a lot of French postmodernism theory that had metastasized into a kind of academic koan, one which treated visual pleasure as a kind of intellectual failing. What Hickey most effectively assaulted was the academic conceit rather than the theoreticians themselves and suddenly it was fine to make beautiful things again and craft suddenly stopped being a dirty word... not that Anish Kapoor and Jeff Koons weren't already doing it and artists like Murakami, Hirst, Andreas Gursky, Josiah McElheny and Olafur Elliason eventually removed all doubt. Likewise, the resurgent interest in Ed Ruscha, Ellsworth Kelly, Richard Serra, Robert Irwin and Judd ultimately solidified the argument that beautiful (or relentlessly visual/kinesthetic) work could be intellectually rigorous.

Overall, I'm interested in seeing where this discussion around Brown's paper hinges on and diverges from the art history of the past 20 years and hopefully some discussion of local examples will ensue (Storm Tharp, Jacqueline Ehlis (who studied with Hickey), Eva Speer, Arcy Douglass, Laura Highes, Jordan Tull, Laura Fritz, Midori Hirose, Adam Sorenson, the Appendix crew and James Lavadour are all germane). Lastly, does beauty still require defending and from whom?

Perhaps reading Arcy's essay from 2008 On Form (or from Polykleitos to Janine Antoni) might be helpful?

Place @ Pioneer Place
700 Sw Fith Ave. Third floor at settlement
August 24th
5:30 - 8:30PM

Posted by Jeff Jahn on August 23, 2011 at 21:27 | Comments (5)


Comments

Or.. you could just go in with an open mind and see if the ideas make sense. Yeah, i could listen to Abbey Road before the new Dr. Dog album.. but why not just enjoy it?

Posted by: Christopher Buckingham [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 24, 2011 10:55 AM

"Lastly, does beauty still require defending..."

No. Beauty is -- like painting and representational art -- a perennial hardy enough to effortlessly survive any attempt -- however intellectually rigorous or fashionable -- to dismiss it.

"...and from whom?"

Adventurers who wandered away from the obvious and got lost.

Posted by: rosenak [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 24, 2011 06:08 PM


This is an interesting topic. Yes beauty and aesthetics must still be defended or it might wander into the territory of saying "art is everything or anything" which is dangerous. If art is everything then it is nothing. It has no independent definition. Ultimately it is a defense of truth.

@rosenak: Your last sentence is beautiful.

Posted by: Faure [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 30, 2011 01:02 PM

The paradox of everything and nothing is an interesting loop. However, it does seem more dangerous to start talking about what isn't art as opposed to anointing what is.

Art lies.
That is the truth.

,

Posted by: ST [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 31, 2011 01:08 PM

(@ST) We are definitely starting from different places. It seems there is two lines of thoughts about language. One popular one, right now, is to be very literal about “meaning”. With that, few things meet the requirements to hold their definitions. The other line of thought recognizes that meaning has always been fluid and that there is no reason to give up on categories. Language recognizes naturally occurring categories and simply gives them a name. A group of objects are recognized as similar, (exp. Flowers, subcategory Roses.) With categories there is variety. If everything is everything, it is all neutral grey.

Back to Art… I think Art holds it’s own definition. It is fluid because we are human. Does some art lie? Yes, some Artists are happy with creating the impression of success instead of true success. (But that sound very human too.) For me, Cult of personality art is very boring but the members of the Cult always look like they are having a good time.

Posted by: Faure [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 6, 2011 07:44 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee