Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Resist: Inauguration at Una Gallery
Early February links
First Thursday Picks February 2017
Dead tree media & dead horse flogging news
Post Snowpocalypse Weekend Picks
More Disjecta'd
New Year opportunities
Monday Integrity Links
First Thursday Picks January 2017
Jason Berlin + Alanna Risse at Rainmaker
Saying goodby to 2016
Mid December Links

recent comments

Double J

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Wednesday 11.23.05

« Buchanan Q & A | Main | Messing with Minimalism »

Danto at PAM

danto7.JPG


Philosophers and critics are notorious for holding onto their intellectual ground at all cost, and Arthur Danto, speaking last Sunday at the Portland Art Museum about the gap between art and life, was no different. Danto described a trajectory in which the differences between art and life were muddled, finally breaking apart completely in the 1960s, leading to our current period in which art is no longer a matter of aesthetics or craftsmanship, but a kind of philosophical game in which a work of art is an embodied meaning. Danto has taught at Columbia's philosophy department since the mid 1960s, and it shows in every aspect of his art criticism.

In Danto's version of art history, the 1960s marked a dramatic shift in which modernism gave way entirely to the pluralism of post-modernism, breaking apart an approach to art making very much based in a single media and ushering in the era of "everything is possible." Artist manifestos and grandiose visions of inciting real change through art were gone. Greenburg's quasi-religious devotion to the idea of art as a quest to find the essence of a single medium (in his case, painting) was no longer relevant. From this period forward, the role of artists shifted - now an artist's primary concern is to generate meaning.

Surprisingly, Danto doesn't come off as particularly jaded or cynical about the state of art, he just approaches art with cool intellectualism - it's an intellectual game, but an enjoyable one that Danto is happy to engage with. He is thorough and brilliant, but interestingly, the consistency of his ideas can seem counterintuitive to his decades-long interest in pluralism and post-modernism. As a philosopher, his overarching ideas come to an intellectual elegance that resembles reality, but ring false when one thinks too deeply about their implications.

Danto ended the lecture with a slide of Shahab Fotouhi and Neda Razavipour's A Few Centimeters Above Sea Level, a bathtub filled with inky water in which several bottles are suspended. Upon further investigation, one learns that there are goldfish inside each bottle, swimming in clean, clear water although surrounded by darkness. It's a work that deals with censorship and the veil. Danto uses this example to describe a system in which artwork as embodied meaning depends on a network of art administrators and critics to disseminate meaning. Danto unconvincingly tries to claim that were it not for the gallery director he would not have been able to uncover the artist's meaning, going on to say that the role of the critic is to uncover meanings for the viewer. It's a rigid system that positions art as philosophical game, leaving the critic-philosopher in the central role.

Looking later at the Fotouhi's website, I learned that the piece also consisted of a video camera which revealed the contents of the bottle, displaying the reaction of the fish inside on a video screen facing out the front window of the gallery. Danto's insistence that there was a possibility for someone to think that the sculpture was simply a tub with bottles falls short. Danto also ignores the greater fabric of social, political and art-world contexts that a work like this fall within. De-contextualized within a philosopher's abstraction of ideas, this example works, but within context, Danto's explanation of the ways in which meaning is manifested doesn't work. Fotouhi and Razavipour's work was a part of a group show at apexart in 2004 with work by Iranian artists - the notion of the veiled woman would be one of the most obvious concepts that would come to mind for a Western audience in trying to find meaning within a show of Iranian artists in New York in 2004. And, the piece surely held a different kind of presence for its audience when shown for the first time in Tehran. Danto is right when he reaffirms the well-entrenched idea that one can no longer rely on the eye alone to experience artwork, but the point isn't just that the artwork is now made up by a complex of ideas, meaning is also gleaned from a very complex pool of ideas and experiences that neither artist nor critic has sole domain over.


Posted by Katherine Bovee on November 23, 2005 at 12:03 | Comments (1)


Comments

Well I think the lines between art and life were actually quite purposefully muddled when the avant garde broke with the academic symbolism of the 1900's... Manet's Olympia appraised the viewer in a cool, "what do you want? I don't care... but you can have it" manner that heightened the subjective experience. Picasso further muddled things with Les Demoiselles d'Avignon by fracturing the picture and meaning through a variety of distortions both ancient and modern.

The funny thing is that those old post modern critics seem to take credit for enhanced subjectivity... They preached a kind of fractured irreconcilable and isolating condition, which really lost its credibility with the WTO riots in Seattle and the demonstrated interconnectedness of September 11th... when the connection between Afghanistan and Wall Street was finally made so plain and simple nobody could miss it.

I agree with Robert Storr (during his Site Santa FE 2004 lecture) that to completely jettison the developments of postmodern theory is intellectually irresponsible but it's equally true that a new paradigm where connections (no matter how subjective on either side) are a big part of how we view the world now. Blame the internet and its interactive component. Instead of post modern isolation it's the multiplicity of connections that can be made and navigated. Sure everyone experiences the world in their own way but just as certainly no man is an island and our circumstances are greatly affected by things that connect to and effect us, both conceptually and on a physical level.

Art as idea is only part of the story, art as a connector is another very important part.

Pluralism and enhanced subjectivity has been the dominant mode since Manet began the battle, Picasso won it and Pollock, Warhol and Duchamp updated it as exemplars. It keeps being updated too with no end in site. The end of art??? Ha! Only a writer making a rhetorical move would wish for such a thing.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 24, 2005 01:29 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee