Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Resist: Inauguration at Una Gallery
Early February links
First Thursday Picks February 2017
Dead tree media & dead horse flogging news
Post Snowpocalypse Weekend Picks
More Disjecta'd
New Year opportunities
Monday Integrity Links
First Thursday Picks January 2017
Jason Berlin + Alanna Risse at Rainmaker
Saying goodby to 2016
Mid December Links

recent comments

Double J

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Monday 12.18.06

« Required Reading | Main | Truitt things have never been said »

Pierre Huyghe at Portland Art Museum

pierre_huyghe_dreaming.jpg
Pierre Huyghe, This is not a time for dreaming, 2004, Live puppet play and super 16mm film, transferred to DigiBeta. 24 minutes, color, sound, Photo: Michael Vahrenwald

If the story of Modernism is in large part a story about progress, then its contemporary re-telling is necessarily about failure. Pierre Huyghe's This is Not a Time for Dreaming chronicles parallel stories about the creative process, at the same time giving form to the failures implicit in both narratives. Commissioned by Harvard University to create a work commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Carpenter Center for the Arts – the sole building by Le Corbusier in the United States and one of only two in the Americas – Huyghe delved into historical records and archival documents to provide source material. The resulting work took the form of a puppet show set to music, performed with a cast of custom-built marionettes and filmed in a pod-like stage that Huyghe constructed as a temporary appendage to the Center. The 16 mm film documenting the performance has been included in solo shows at the Musée d'Art moderne de la Ville de Paris and Tate Modern, and is currently on view as part of the Miller Meigs contemporary art series at the Portland Art Museum.

Plagued by his struggles to create a piece under the bureaucratic auspices of a commission, Huyghe fashions a duel narrative that interweaves the story of the work's creation with the story of Le Corbusier's experiences designing the building. The film is at once narrative and dreamlike, portraying the inception of both projects, the creative process of both artist and architect, their struggles in realizing their projects, and the outcomes. Le Corbusier is portrayed both as the sympathetic subject of the puppet show and as an omnipresent, though at times oppressive, source of creative inspiration for Huyghe. Throughout the narrative looms the figure of Mr. Harvard, dean of deans, an ominous insect-like black presence that embodies the burden of tradition and history that taints the commissioners of both projects as well as Le Corbusier and Huyghe. Called upon to create a piece about the Center, Huyghe responds by subverting the mythology of Le Corbusier and Harvard, creating a narrative puppet show about the struggles inherent in the creative process. In Huyghe's hands, the celebrated building by Le Corbusier is less a beacon of Modern ideals then a symbol of incomplete gestures and unrealized ideas.

The Carpenter Center for the Arts was conceived in the mid 1950s as an architectural project that would reflect the utopian vision of synthèse des arts. The fusion of art and architecture is further enforced by the film's soundtrack, most of which is excerpted from works by French composer Edgard Varèse and Greek composer and architect Iannis Xennakis. Varèse's Poème électronique – an early sound-based installation played through over 400 speakers – was composed for the Philipps pavilion at the 1958 World Fair, designed by Xennakis under the direction of Le Corbusier. In early plans for the Carpenter Center, Le Corbusier included auditory and temporal elements, reminiscent of the cross-disciplinary nature of the Philipps pavilion, that were never realized. Throughout the film, Huyghe references the architect's original plans for the building, which included electronic bells that would regularly broadcast from the building, as well as his idea that seeds dropped by birds flying overhead would eventually cause greenery to sprout, embellishing the concrete surfaces of the building with organic growth.

Huyghe also relays the story of Le Corbusier's compromise to the design of the building itself, which underwent many modifications in order to fulfill the expectations of its commissioners. In one scene, Le Corbusier is depicted in heated negotiation with Mr. Harvard over the Center's design, as the building transmogrifies before their eyes. Huyghe's film consistently returns to the notion of artistic compromise, and in doing so, hints at the failure of Modern idealism. This is Not a Time for Dreaming is not the first work by Huyghe to reference Le Corbusier. Huyghe's Les Grands Ensembles (1994–2001) casts two high rise postwar apartment buildings – inadequate imitations of Le Corbusier's social architecture – as the film's main characters. Their spectral volumes communicate silently through flickering lights, a strangely poetic musing on Modern alienation and the failure of progressive thought to result in viable urban programs.

Through the retelling of the story of Le Corbusier's Carpenter Center, Huyghe gives voice to the architect's unrealized visions for the building. By devising a puppet play – a mode of entertainment and an enclosed narrative form – and constructing a temporary stage, Huyghe creates a physical and conceptual place for these ideas to be re-enacted. Huyghe's singular vision dominates the narrative, a nod to the singularity of Modernism. At the same time, he undermines his own power as storyteller. Huyghe relies on metafictive devices, telling a story within a story about the creation of his own piece. One is never left unaware of the mechanics of storytelling. The strings of the marionettes are clearly visible and the camera's point of view changes arbitrarily throughout the course of the film, at times revealing the sides of the stage, the walls of the theater and silhouettes of the audience members' heads. The final scene, "Epilogue as prologue," is a dense monologue by Liam Gillick – the British artist who uses architectural forms and theory as an integral part of his work – as read by a bearded Harvard professor. Here, Huyghe completes the circularity of his narrative, ending the film precisely at the moment that the play (and thus the film) begins. It is the only part of the film that employs words, providing a statement that is at once a practical introduction to the characters, a disclaimer about the subjective nature of such a project, and a self-contained critical text about the film of which it is a part of.

Despite the self-conscious, hyper-aware nature of Huyghe's piece, he does not completely disavow the artistic process. While the creative process is shown in a parasitic relationship to the institutions that support it – much like the relationship of Huyghe's temporary stage to the Carpenter Center, or Huyghe's project to Le Corbusier's legacy – it is not depicted as an entirely futile exercise. The play may be, as the epilogue explains, "A set of relations with no dialog. A communication by proxy." But in the end, relations are made, buildings are constructed, commissions are completed. In the fourth act of the play, Le Corbusier is shown shortly after a dream sequence in which skeletal models of the architect's previous buildings float dreamlike above his head, providing creative inspiration for the first sketch of the Carpenter Center. The film cuts to an extended scene of the bespectacled architect performing a soft shoe routine to "Le temps des cerises," performed by Charles Trenet, the French Frank Sinatra. The song – a nostalgic and bittersweet love song written in the 19th century by Jean Baptiste Clément just before the Commune de Paris that would later become a song of resistance during WWII – is about the time of cherries, the point between spring and summer and a signal of change. In Huyghe's film, it evokes the time of creative inspiration, a moment of fertile artistic and conceptual indulgence before an idea's realization in the physical world.


Posted by Katherine Bovee on December 18, 2006 at 13:19 | Comments (1)


Comments

Katherine,

Just for the sake of breaking out an old saw, Ive always rejected the idea that modernism was about only about progress. Picasso's Les Demoiselles was clearly an anxious painting about change and unresolved context. Same with Mattisse's Red studio. Same goes for Pollock's classic works or even Leger menacing plastic constructions.

But yeah, to sell modernism to an American audience Alfred Barr defined a much narrower and more digestable model that looked a lot like "progress". (I loved it earlier this year when Elderfield displayed a diagram called the torpedo at PAM.) Barr's legacy is part of the reason MoMA has such an identity crisis these days (maybe they need to comission Huyghe to do something?).

Huyghe seems to have refined Matthew Barney's pagentry, marrried it to wonder, logistics and bureaucracy and created a wonderfully reflexive and nearly upbeat body of work. It's the French version of optimism so to many Americans it might seem pessimistic.

It's interesting because European reviews of his shows (particularly the Tate show) note the optimism and Americans focus on the pessimism.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 18, 2006 03:22 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee