Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Lectures
Bridge Design Panel
Todd Johnson at PNCA
Politics & Community
Tuesday Links
The Butterfly Effect
Vito Acconci at the Nevada Art Museum's Art + Environment Conference
Goings On
Pointy
Andrea Zittel follow-up
Calling Artists & Curators
Models of Critical Production

recent comments

Double J
Arnie
Calvin Ross Carl
elle4

categories

 

Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Jenene Nagy
Ryan Pierce

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Wednesday 12.26.07

« Holiday reading | Main | 2007 Recap »

2 New condos for the Pearl District: it's design review time

Casey.jpg
The Casey

Ive been waiting for a slow week to discuss these two new condos in the Pearl District. Neither is a product of of the design deficient, "let's put brick on a 10+ story building to warm it up," school of thought.

casey2.jpg
The Casey shows off its unique cladding

First is The Casey, which is the first residential condo to sport a LEED platinum rating so it's very green conscious. The design though has made some people crazy but I wanted to wait until it was more complete before weighing in.

Verdict it's a C+ in my book, basically it's a box with a novel form of cladding. Ive grown accustomed to its unique look and those that dont like it are missing its best asset. The cladding does does make it look very Swiss but the proportions are clunky. Still I have to give it points for taking some chances by not using brick. It sticks out. A C+ isn't bad coming from me, I'm not certain any very recent large building project in Portland would qualify above a B+ except the Tram and people don't live in that. For scale I'd give The Gregory a B- and the totally unimaginative Elizabeth a C- (which is nowhere near as low as I go). Let's hope The Casey's penchant for sticking out will lead to more of that kind of thinking. It's a step in the right direction and the platinum rating doesn't hurt either. What do you think?

Metropolitan.jpg
The Metropolitan

The Metropolitan wouldn't stand out in Miami but it does in Portland's brick clad Pearl District. It has a a LEED silver rating so it isn't amazingly green like The Casey, but it is a solid looking effort, next to an urban wetland park.

Metropolitan2.jpg
The Metropolitan and its neighbors

Comprised of blue and white rectangles with lots of glass it's a solid choice and get's a B-. For comparison the nearby Pinnacle just gets a C in my book and The Wyatt is a D+.

Let us know what you think? In my mind high-rise condos by virtue of their increased visibility must be held to higher standards and no design below a C- should be given a pass by the design commission... then again the landmarks commision are the people who blocked an Apple store, preferring the type of design a Potterybarn spews so I ain't holding my breath. Designs to look forward to are Park Avenue West and Skylab's tower. Yes, change can be scary but if the design is up to snuff like on the tram it will be worth it. The artists in Portland have reinvigorated the idea of what Portland can be but to a certain degree its the developers and architects who must run with that momentum. Only then will the donor and collector bases in Portland grow enough to do the visual arts activity here the justice it deserves.

Posted by Jeff Jahn on December 26, 2007 at 15:09 | Comments (4)


Comments

I am very interested in the older buildings of portland. It is amazing to me the texture, window patterns and molding architects but into older warehouses left on the east side industrial area. I have been drawn to paint them over the last few years and I think the details are prized by other people. It is idealistic that architectures would that now. It is too expensive...
but the bridgport brewing is painstackingly maintained. These buildings are going to be there for a long time why not make them add texture and beauty to the city. I think it would but people at a higher priority to fast building and profits.

Posted by: elle4 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 27, 2007 01:00 PM

It's almost sad that these buildings are even worth writing about, but in an architecturally deprived city like Portland, I suppose it is news-worthy when a building consists of a material besides bricks or steels.

Everyone knows Portland is progressive, unique, blah blah blah, but I'll be damned if we aren't missing that progressive and unique architecture.

End cynicism here. I do really enjoy The Casey building. It looks beautiful in the Pearl skyline, and really separates itself from all the drab grey and brick red. The Metropolitan is also interesting, despite the Eddie Bauer that is ruining the front of the building. :)

Posted by: Calvin Ross Carl [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 28, 2007 04:03 PM

Before reading your comments I said to myself - "Ugly building except for the brick". I don't totally disagree with your C+ grade here. I would give the building a grade of C because millions of dollars, degrees, computers, years of study and time for architects to drive their Crossfires and Boxsters along the water should have generated more than this. Still, the shade of the stonework is critical to the building's salvation, and they did get that right.

Let's remember that this will probably be gracing this portion of town for well into the 2100's. Quality matters.

Posted by: Arnie [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 29, 2007 10:10 PM

I consider the LEED platinum certification in my grading... that's why it gets a C+

The fact that the first Platinum rated residential condo in the USA only manages a C+ is kinda dissapointing, so I'm with you on that.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 06:14 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee