Nathaniel Shapiro at PNCA's Izquierdo Gallery
Last year I noted Nathaniel
Shapiro as one of the most promising new artists to the Portland art scene
In just under a year he's proven why with a stark and beautifully
laid out show in PNCA's Manuel Izquierdo Sculpture Gallery
. The gallery hours
are M-F 9-5 and Sat-Sun 10-3 but PNCA's III-D building is often locked so you'll
have to press the red buzzer at the inside door to get let in. Have patience,
someone will eventually come. Needless to say PNCA needs a student gallery attendant
here, they used to have one when I first started visiting this space.
all the trouble and yes Shapiro has another separate piece in the Swigert Commons that
I'll avoid here just because it's mostly an excellently executed exercise in wit and rather unrelated.
Titled "The Way of Progress" Shapiro's most convincing show to date consists
of only two installations, neither of which utilizes any gallery lighting because
they provide their own light sources.
The first piece is a corner installation consisting of a stool and a white cabinet filled with unused full spectrum lights stored too high for anyone who isn't
over 6 feet tall. The full spectrum lights have a nice light blue color that
gives them a more charged visual presence. Below them is a typical shop stool outfitted
with active fluorescent light tubes for legs. It's a pretty clear metaphor for
opportunities or ideas (light bulbs) that can only be conceptualized when they
are placed within sight, even if it is still technically out of reach at the moment.
The stool would be the metaphorical remedy that makes the light bulb opportunities
available, but the legs being "light" makes them seem only theoretical (ie. look dont climb).
The second and much more visually arresting piece incorporates a single extension
ladder in the main gallery space. Like the stool its structural rungs have been
replaced with fluorescent tubes. The piece is perfectly executed and is the only
light source in the room. At the top of the ladder is a dangling light fixture
with one of the blue bulbs, and like the ones in storage is not active. It's a very poetic and complete show that still looks like it is being installed, nice touch.
Is this a jungle gym for the mind? Myself, I read it as an art piece designed to conceptualize
the experience of industrial (flavin-esque) light as a stand in for potential human activities.
This works particularly well as an art piece installed in an art school
it's a highly effective a form of institutional critique and celebration and
as a mental test pattern. Its an invitation for the eyes and mind.
As an institution PNCA has come a long way
7 years ago they were struggling,
now they have bursting enrollment #'s, a bid for the potentially Portland
paradigm changing 511 building
, the 15 million dollar Hallie Ford endowment,
great international caliber shows/residencies like Beth Campbell
by James Turrell and the upcoming Jacques
. Still the school requires a home (they don't own any property,
hence the importance of the 511 building bid with the GSA). The solution is
simple, they need an aggressive fundraising campaign so they can expand the
facilities and endow teaching positions (to pay better salaries which are also
needed). Currently, their renter status is hurting their financial makeup and
keeping budgets slimmer than if they were building equity rather than hemmoraging it.
Such a capital/endowment campaign (which is clearly underway) would give PNCA back
some of the institutional patina they lost when they split from the museum and
allow them to fill out their somewhat vestigial institutional organs
are kinda like a well fed caterpillar that has made a big cocoon and is
preparing to emerge. The fact that they have so many connections to old west
hills money and new design oriented businesses in Portland means they are just
as capable as PAM was to grow up. It's their time
and everyone including
their professors like Shapiro feel it.
Shapiro, has channeled the zeitgeist at the college (and Portland's art scene
in general) better than anyone in recent memory as his work is first rate execution,
while seemingly waiting for the main event. Its pensive work that will probably
will grow just as exponentially as it did in the last year. It is fascinating
to watch and PNCA has become the most exciting hub of artistic activity in the
city. Shapiro is a great asset to the school.
(Show ends March 3rd)
Posted by Jeff Jahn
on February 22, 2008 at 11:34
| Comments (6)
A couple years ago, when I was running the PNCA Student Council, we had a lighting salesmen come in to propose some new lighting solutions for the school. The salesmen proceeded to get very excited about a specific fluorescent tube, and sincerely stated it was "the wave of the future." This was a running joke for quite some time at PNCA, about how everything was "the wave of the future." I couldn't help but think that Nate's show was a formalization of that quote. I don't believe he ever heard it, but his show art certainly helping PNCA become "the wave of the future."
He also has an installation in PNCA's main building as well, which I believe is titled "Unlimited Minutes, Text and Picture Messaging." It's interactive, so go play with it.
Posted by: Calvin Ross Carl at February 24, 2008 12:48 PM
We would like to inform you the art web gallery " J-COLLABO.COM" which
is created by creators working mainly in both USA and Japan. Please access
this website in your free time. http://www.j-collabo.com We are planning to renew
the web site around mid of Feb. We'll have the new page "Art Blog List" in it.
We are collecting the blogs which is very sophisticated and high quality.
We would also be glad if you can allow your website to put in it. Is it OK that we
can put your web address in our web site? Please let us know if it's OK.
With sincere thanks.
Posted by: J-COLLABO at February 24, 2008 10:31 PM
Although I don't entirely disagree with Jeff Jahns' estimation of Nathaniel Shapiros' potential as an artist I do have a more critical response to this particular installation.
In part the poetry of the work is reinforced by how poorly light is generally used in nearly every local art venue no matter what kind of work is being displayed. Light is a powerful tool that can lend an emotive atmosphere to pretty much any object when used to optimum effect. The history of its usage to manipulate the experience of art is extensive. Personally I became aware of this strategy while wandering though a retrospective of the work of Christian Boltanski in the late eighties.
That said Shapiro does broaden the use of this device to include metaphor and implied narrative (with the viewer as protagonist). To elaborate on one of the points that Jahn makes- I consider the greatest strength of these pieces to be the tension between the desire to physically interact with them (after all they are metaphorically and literally images of human ascension) and the understanding that doing so would destroy them. The concepts on their own are unremarkable and the irony somewhat obvious but the experience of their presence can lead to rich and knotty flights of thought. For me it is the invitation to the body that gives this work what potency it has.
To advance as an artist I think Shapiro needs to cut himself free from the tightness of his concepts. The sensual and aesthetic qualities of these pieces only marginally save them from being merely over-worked one-liners. The relationship between craft and concept does work fairly well here, but I think repetition of the formula without taking exploratory risks would lead to the usual dead-end of performing insignificant variations on a prematurely limited vocabulary. .
This isn't a criticism of this particular show but I never imagined that the extension chord would become a sculptural cliche.
One more thing, and this is addressed to Jeff Jahn, I invite you to join me in boycotting the use of any form of the word exponential in any context outside of mathematics and science. It isn't a misusage but has become overused to the point of impotency. I would even prefer the dumbness of something like "he is a billion times better than last year". I'm picky like that.
Posted by: beardfallacy at February 25, 2008 03:28 AM
and the word "dumbness" isnt overused?
I suppose I can compromise and use the phrase "exponential dumbness" somewhere but that seems forced.
I agree, Shapiro pulls this one off mostly through the poetry of his installation which invites the viewer (not novelty of concept). Still, I appreciate the fact that he is essentially testing a very simple metaphorical conceit with an incredibly stark installation, he isnt pulling any punches and the fact that it looks like an install in progress just makes it all the better.
When confronted with works like this I often think about Greek sculpture and thay ambivalence they seem to exude. This is one really wonderful .show, because I normally can't stand this kind of didacticism. Ambivalence and didacticism are strange bedfellows.
Posted by: Double J at February 25, 2008 09:44 AM
I just gotta quibble with your quibbling. The alleged overuse of the word "dumbness" is not comparable to the overuse of the word "exponential". The word "exponential" when not used rhetorically, as it is above, is a formula for a geometric kind of growth and does not always denote fast growth. Being relational it can be used to describe slow growth over long periods of time. Rhetorically it is a hyperbolic expression of fast growth. The problem with the overuse of hyperbolic figures of speech is that they lose their power of exaggeration and become ineffectual cliches. Just consider the word "masterpiece".
The word "dumbness" having a relatively simple and clear definition lacks such rhetorical use and will retain it's meaning whether it is overused or not.
I usually don't like to spend this much time responding to sophistry but my dvd player is broken.
Posted by: beardfallacy at February 26, 2008 04:27 AM
Just so that every post I make isn't an incitement to argue, I appreciated your reference to Greek sculpture.- it helps restore my faith in viewers when they make intuitive analogical leaps, especially when the association is based on presence and atmosphere or any of the other qualities that can't be tamed by rationality. Yours felt just right and it wouldn't have occurred to me (not the fact that you could be right). I am also always happy to here another person express disdain for the didactic as a dominant element in a work of art - I'm paraphrasing so I hope I'm not putting words in your mouth or a foot in mine.
Being nice makes me sleepy so I'll stop and go get mad at something else.
Posted by: beardfallacy at February 28, 2008 04:23 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
. Now you can comment. (sign
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by
the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear
on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)