Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Early September Links
Labor Day Weekend Picks
Museumy Links
Wendy Given at Vernissage
Mid August Links
Grace Kook-Anderson in Conversation
Portland Art Adventures
Early August Art News
August must see picks
End of July News
Alia Ali's Borderland at Bluesky
Mid Summer Reads

recent comments




Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Friday 09.30.05

« Shining some light on the collection | Main | The Beginning of the Affair by Jen Rybolt »

Maintain Full Speed

Tudor Mitroi, Staff 5 & Staff 7

The Affair is less than 24 hours away, which means that September has sadly passed and we are launching into yet another overactive month in October. Before we let September slip away entirely, a quick revisit of one of September's standout shows, Inertia 2005 at Gallery 500, an exhibition of 13 artists from across the United States, juried by PORT's very own hyperactive curator, Jeff Jahn.

The premises of the exhibition was to dig up new talent from across the nation, and as a result work runs the gamut, from conceptually-oriented work to pieces driven primarily by good design. Thankfully, the pool of over 100 artists who submitted work for the show was narrowed down to a mere 13 artists, avoiding the mistake of other group shows I've seen at Gallery 500, where an exuberance for the maximal tends to result in cramped installations.

There is no mystery as to why Tudor Mitroi's staffs, painted panels cut into long, thin shapes, appeal to Jahn, who makes medium sized painted panels cut into irregular lightning bolt shapes. Mitrol's works are large, yet have a sense of delicacy difficult to achieve at such a large scale. His two staffs show painted details of maps that outline different courses, one that seems to be a walking route of some sort, the other a driving route that the artist used daily to travel between home and work. One side of each panel is cut to follow the route. The shapes look awkwardly thin, yet threatening, like jagged weapons. They also serve as documentation of the artist's journeys, adding a performative aspect that recalls work by artists like Richard Long.

John Mueller challenges the notion of documentation in Subterfuge, an opaque black bottle housed in a vitrine atop a flawlessly crafted black pedestal. Alongside the black bottle is another museum-like display with a lit x-ray that reveals a play on the ship-in-a-bottle trick. The viewer's complete experience of the object hinges on his or her willingness to believe the artist's documentation. It's an issue with many implications, especially as performance art has created a genre in which one is often forced to experience the piece based solely on documentation. Tom Friedman's 1000 Hours of Staring, a blank piece of paper that the artist has purportedly stared at for the given number of hours, is probably my all-time favorite piece that deals with the issues of fact vs. fantasy and trust between the artist and viewer.


Joseph Lupo, who garnered best of show, and Kristin Skees, who has gained much praise on the street and in the press, both presented formally successful pieces, but I couldn't shake a feeling of deja vu looking at their work. Lupo's oversized receipts, painstakingly reproduced by hand from actual receipts, form a kind of arbitrary biography of the mundane details of the artist's life. Each receipt is convincingly rendered in familiar tones of faded purple and black. They work, but Brooklyn-based artist Ester Partegas created oversized, hand-drawn receipts for her Details series, which I saw in 2002 at apexart in New York. Partegas uses oversized bits of tape to attach her receipts casually across the gallery wall, complete with crooked folds that suggest these bits of paper were once shoved into a back pocket or rescued from the bottom of a purse. As likeable as Lupo's work is, his decision to frame his receipts gave them a heavy-handed aspect that contributed to the fact that I never could quite get over the nagging thought that Partegas did this kind of work better several years ago. It was strong work, just too close to the earlier work of a more established artist, and I'll be curious to see what Lupo presents in his upcoming solo show, which he earned as part of his best of show prize.

Kristin Skees' knitted red Tool Cozies, which lovingly caress the hard metal surfaces of drills, screwdrivers and staple guns, serve as an updated take on feminist art, with an appropriately crafty bent very fitting for 2005. The piece doesn't parse gender stereotypes with any degree of sophistication, but if that's the point, then it's very successful as a kind of shallow and cynical take on what it means to create feminist art right now. One of my former professors at Lewis & Clark, Phyllis Yes, was very sincerely questioning gender stereotypes by "feminizing" objects from the toolshed decades ago. Skees' work can't be sincere, and so it works best as a second-generation feminism that ambiguously rests between a statement on gender and a critique of art about gender. A photograph of a man in a red knitted "Husband Cozy" works better than Skees' actual objects, perhaps because it doesn't toe the line of sincerity quite so closely.

Josh Feldman, Fifi's in the Army Now

Other notable works in the show include Brian Lemond's wall pieces, which uses wood grain to form repeating geometric surfaces. Similar to Elizabeth Blade's illuminated screen and Josh Feldman's excellent digital prints, Lemond's pieces seem to offer little more than really great design sense, but in this case, that's enough. Ken Turner's Blue Door Yo-Yo, comprised of a series of photographs of a woman performing what appears to be a traditional Asian fan dance with a man completing an elaborate yo-yo routine, hinges on formal resonance to explore interactions between high and low performance. Patrick Rock, who is gaining new notoriety around town for his big bouncy wiener at Fresh Trouble, presents two videos, once of a red ball bouncing at surprising speeds along a desert floor, the other a repeating Naumen-esque scenario of a disheveled man opening a beer on top of a Styrofoam cooler before it breaks, again and again.

Inertia 2005 offers an eclectic group of work, no doubt fulfilling its aim of bringing a roster of new names and solid young talent to Gallery 500.

Posted by Katherine Bovee on September 30, 2005 at 8:27 | Comments (3)


I have never doubted that Friedman really did spend 1,000 Hours of Staring at that piece of paper. So, for me, it isn't really about trust, fact, fantasy, etc. Rather, I take it as a statement that share effort & process isn't enough, that the result matters too.

One thousand hours is quite a bit of time--forty hours a week for half a year. However, Friedman spent three years on the piece, which works out to a bit less than an hour a day. I like to think he spent the time meditating rather than simply staring.

Posted by: SimEnzo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 09:23 AM

Oops, make that sheer effort.

Posted by: SimEnzo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 09:25 AM

Because Friedman's work is so exacting, I didn't ever doubt that he actually spent 1000 hours in front of this piece of paper either. However, he purposely avoided providing documentation that would somehow provide evidence, which I think is very significant. I think of 1,000 Hours of Staring as more of a byproduct Friedman's studio practice than a manifesto of the importance of result. Call it staring or call it meditation, but the act of looking is very important for Friedman. In the excellent Phaidon monograph on Friedman, he recounts a pivotal time at graduate school, when he cleared out everything from his studio, boarded up the windows and painted everything white. He stopped trying to make art, instead using his studio as a space in which he would bring in objects one at a time to spend hours looking, thinking, considering this object in a pristine space. I think this type of studio practice is why he is able to reconceptualize objects in a very elemental way.

Other works by Friedman operate in a very similar realm as 1,000 Hours of Staring For example, his piece entitled Everything, which is in some ways the antithesis of his blank piece of paper. Friedman claims that the piece contains all of the words in the English language written on a large sheet of paper. Although it's written plainly in ballpoint pen in front of us, it's nearly as unverifiable as 1,000 Hours of Staring, not to mention necessarily false given the mutability of language. Also, his cursed pedestal - are we to believe that it's really cursed? Where does reality/fact end and fantasy begin in this piece? I just found an excellent interview from 1997 in which Friedman directly discusses this issue of fantasy:


Posted by: keuro [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 3, 2005 09:48 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee