Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Brenna Murphy at Upfor
Mike Rathbun opening and talk
Monday Link
PAM hosts Wiki edit-a-thon
Mark Morrisroe one night show and book release
Kartz Ucci, a force for new media art RIP
Monday Links
First Weekend October
Friday Links
First Thursday Picks October 2013
Tuesday Links
Jorge Pardo talk and dedication today

recent comments

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Saturday 03.10.12

« Friday Links | Main | There is always a bigger rock »

Vastness: Joe Thurston and Arcy Douglass

In this month of Rothko's vast personal spaces populated by nothing but color and texture two current Portland artists, Joe Thurston and Arcy Douglass (a PORT contributor) have also found a way to tap into a related sense of the endless. In fact, they are two of the most convincing solo shows by living Portland artists in recent memory. Yes, people make a big deal of group shows, mostly as a kind of social event but it is solo shows such as these, which ultimately determine who is who. In this case both Thurston and Douglass, though in different places in their career have shown themselves to be A-listers who conceive and execute in a relentless way that a lot of academics simply cannot. For living Portland artists they constitute the best two shows up in March... nothing else is even close.

Thurston101_sm.jpg
Joe Thurston's Nothing Leading Anywhere Any More Except to Nothing (all photos Jeff Jahn)

Though they couldn't be more different, Thurston (the hermetic) and Douglass (the systemic), they do share is a strategy of self similar events (if not objects proper) with the net result being a maze like configuration that is both easy to enter and leave when the time comes.

Thurston's show Nothing Leading Anywhere Any More Except to Nothing (new sculpture) is exactly what the title promises, an exhibition of indistinguishable obfuscations, feints and cyphers with no real key and potentially no answers to decode. In many ways it resembles a Chinese philosopher's garden and as one walks amongst the expertly distressed crates... they look like things too antiqued for their modern utilitarian form. Is it mold or water damage? It reminds me of the Chinese Scholar's rocks or Gongshi, which are farmed over time to create their air of weathered ancientness. This false ancientness, which still takes considerable time, patience and eventually true ancientness is similar to Thurston's latest show.

Thurston3_sm.jpg

In fact, for this show Thurston was very interested in cypsistic camouflage (using a uniformity of nonspecific surface treatments, like cheetah spots) to obliterate clues as to what each packing crate might have once held and what it might still hold. I'm told one of the crates held a de Kooning at one time. In many ways this is the first convincing de Kooning related piece since Robert Rauschenberg's Erased de Kooning. Thurston's erasure constitutes an obfuscated maze of possibilities... and you know it no longer holds anything like a de Kooning, just air... or maybe some of the odd stuff Joe has accumulated in his various studios over the years.

It also highlights the way minimalism tried to distance itself from its precursors by treating the surface not as "perfect" as many imperfectly believe but as simply reveals nothing... ie... no distractions. You can always tell when someone doesn't really understand Judd when they hyper-focus on his surfaces. It is a red herring, the truly important part is how the innate quality of the materials shines forth while nothing is particularly noteworthy or terribly fancy... technically that's more Anish Kapoor, Damien Hirst or Jeff Koons' thing. In a way Thurston is reverse engineering these crates, which in "some cases" protected important art objects so that their original air of mystique is complimented by an equally mysterious by less specific surface. He's essentially turned it inside out, except that it is a double falsehood. I like this... it is almost a form of artistic counterintelligence masquerading as contemporary archeology.

The net effect makes walking amongst the pieces akin to skulking about a warehouse or a crypt and there is an endless sense of wonder at play here. In fact it is so well done that one doesn't know whether the specifics of the crates was more interesting before or after the art making process, whereby each crate simply becomes a volume. In many ways this keeps the viewer from lingering very long on one piece as each other is pretty much just as interesting as the last... which then forces the viewer to consider their path (one of my favorite existential/meditative tricks). Once path consideration becomes a focus the personal mass/volume orientation dance to art piece mass volume orientation dance begins. Think square dancing for scholars and and you have a good indication of what this show does so well.

Lastly, this is a huge departure for Thurston who in the past created very textured abstract forms for walls and one senses major life changes at work. There is a sense of packing up and beginning again here which is something most mid career artists have trouble doing. They get too stuck in their own history and successes, which Thurston doesn't seem to be too mired in. In the end for an artists whose colors have always been so bold and integral to the success of his works this new non-hierarchical brown uniformity shows just how versatile and comprehensively capable he is.

tenThousand2_sm.jpg
Arcy Douglass' Ten Thousand Things at PCC Sylvania


Arcy Douglass' Ten Thousand Things at PCC Sylvania's Northview Gallery pulls off something I wish we would see more of in Portland, a classic one big gallery = one big piece style show. The idea here seems simple, present video of 10,000 dots which vary in size and perceived luminosity on a second to second basis. It forms a large non-heirarchical field that is at once vast and approachable (not unlike Rothko who is one of Douglass' favorite artists). This field flickers like the night sky and it is difficult to take in when viewing the whole thing.

Up close the magic expands as the viewers own shadow creates a disruption in this computer generated universe. In fact if there are other people viewing up close with you they become camouflaged with the same dot pattern that resembles being scanned into an early 80's video game... but instead of Tron, the feeling is decidedly Kubrickian. In those close quarters the individual dots reveal the individual pixels at play and the screen door effect of the projectors actually heightens the sense of grid mapping at work here. Not unlike the way your GPS enabled phone tracks your whereabouts and signal strength.

TenThousand4_sm.jpg
Ten Thousand Things (detail)

Overall, if Douglass' last solo show tied to evoke vastness by taking millions of years to watch in entirety this one succeeds even more convincingly because even if it repeated every hour I doubt the human mind would be able to perceive it's repetition. In a way this new strategy is a more generous kind of program, which emboldens the viewer to explore. Also, in a a move reminiscent of other influences Bruce Nauman and Rem Koolhaas, Douglass has included several rolling chairs.

Rolling chairs are generally for offices, not the contemplation of the infinite but Douglass harnesses the often unrequited promise of freedom of movement these chairs possess and lets it free. In fact, this show though stoic and shrine-like lets you get off your feet and experience the work without the full load of gravity's pull on the entire body. Bruce Nauman did something similar for the first iteration of his masterpiece Mapping the Studio I (Fat Chance John Cage). When the second version of the piece installed at Dia Beacon the chairs lost their wheels and the piece lost a certain freedom as well. For Douglass' piece the chair's effect isn't crucial, simply revealing... we perceive our route making and existential state more than a little bit through our feet! When I view this show standing, I'm a hunter, choosing which dot to track or not. When I'm off my feet I'm more like a baby and pay more attention to the way the room shifts and the way the lights are not pure white... in fact they have halos of color when blooming. It is all very Kubrickian, which still means... something rather good and special is at work.


Posted by Jeff Jahn on March 10, 2012 at 19:48 | Comments (0)


Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee