Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Lectures
Bridge Design Panel
Todd Johnson at PNCA
Politics & Community
Tuesday Links
The Butterfly Effect
Vito Acconci at the Nevada Art Museum's Art + Environment Conference
Goings On
Pointy
Andrea Zittel follow-up
Calling Artists & Curators
Models of Critical Production

recent comments

Double J
rosenak
Sean Casey
Sean Casey
MOR

categories

 

Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Jenene Nagy
Ryan Pierce

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Friday 08.01.08

« Natzlers at MoCC | Main | Last Chance Reviews »

Seattle Public Art Opportunity

seattle-mayor.jpg
From the Seattle Mayor's Office

The Seattle Mayor's Office of Arts & Cultural Affairs wants to purchase 2D art from emerging Northwest artists. Correction: They have a $30K budget, they will purchase more than two works, judged by panel... The pieces will go into the Seattle Public Utilities' Portable Works Collection. The deadline for submission is August 25. For more application details, click here.

Posted by Megan Driscoll on August 01, 2008 at 9:00 | Comments (5)


Comments

"special consideration given to colorful artworks"


While I always appreciate public money spent on art, it's horrifying the way that public art programs often lead to curation by committee - and to really bland public art that couldn't possibly offend anyone's sensibilities...

Posted by: MOR [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 1, 2008 02:05 PM

MOR, you are so correct.

The whole public art process is so inbred and full of cousin-humping it's pathetic.

When will I see some public art with some effing SACK?

Ironically, the only one in Portland is Joan of Arc on Glisan. Whoever guilded that statue, please contact me. I will mow your lawn for free. Seriously. Your work has given me that much pleasure and hope.

Yeah, and don't tell me about Portlandia. It suffers from the same Bartholdi/Michelangelo problem of using men for female models. Too scared of anything feminine or sensual in the public realm. "let's stick with the masculine artspeak bullshit."

Public art should be renamed "committee art" because that, in all honesty, is what it is.

There's no realism, because no one wants to commit to anything "real".

Here's a suggestion for all you public art committe members. Choose an Artist, instead of the "piece". Ask what they need to make their project come to fruition. And give them the money and materials to do so.

Then cross your fingers.

If the piece works, you all can claim credit. If not, the artist will crash and burn. And you can point the blame. Simple enough.

Thank you for allowing me to comment.

Posted by: Sean Casey [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 2, 2008 11:21 PM

Upon reflection, I think some of my comments may have been a little crass.

My apologies in advance if I offended anyone. I'll try to edit myself better in the future.

The lawn offer is still good though.

Thank you.

Posted by: Sean Casey [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 3, 2008 01:09 PM

Hey Sean --

Thanks for the good Picasso quote on that other thread.

Posted by: rosenak [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 3, 2008 09:26 PM

Public art gets people all riled up... no need to apologize really. I really like that Joan of Arc sculpure too, she can pull off the bling.

One thing though, I think Seattle does a MUCH better job of putting ballsy public art in fron of people than Portland does. Chicago does it better than any modern city in the last 60 years.

Portland has changed a lot in the last 10-15 years so the question now should be does the public art Portland puts out there reflect the change in cajones the art scene has experienced? It's natural for the the public art to lag somewhat behind the scene but does the public art simply follow the the real scene's wake? What if it provoked the way Sharf''s tiki totems in the Pearl did nearly 10 years ago? Where are the projects that have similar balls? It isnt an easy thing to start doing. It takes leadership like a paige Powell or Mayor Dailey to make happen. Committee are what they are... if there arent any real leaders on the comittee you can almost predict the outcome.

Hopefully Bruce Conkle's thing for Trimet actually happens? Ive heard about some good things for the I-205/Clackamas light rail line.

Posted by: Double J [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 4, 2008 09:46 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee