Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

City survey left out the Arts, add them back!
Late May Institutional Links
Early May links
Ending April Institutional Links
Weekend Picks
Thoughts on Tuski leaving PNCA
Mid April Links
America's Whispered Truths closing at Archer Gallery
Early April Critique of Institution Links
Spring Cleaning Cluster Reviews
Spring Calls

recent comments




Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Monday 10.31.05

« The Art of the scare | Main | 2 Lectures: Jencks, Hatoum »

McGinness at PICA


That graphic design has seeped into the realm of contemporary art isn't revelatory news and shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody living in Portland. Portland and its environs can boast top design firms like Wieden + Kennedy and ziba; hordes of shoe designers who work for Nike and Adidas, both of which have major headquarters here; and has its very out outpost for the cause of graphic design as art, Compound Gallery, not to mention galleries like motel where you can find plenty of crossover. It has also has served as home base for design stars like Scott Patt, who recently moved away to head up design at Converse.

One of the major graphic designers to storm the contemporary art world is New York-based Ryan McGinness, who treated a packed house in the W+K atrium last Thursday to a barrage of slides detailing his work and practice over the past 6 years. A graduate of Carnegie Mellon, McGinness studied in both the design and art programs, but maintained a separation in his mind between his more practical design work with other studio practice. Working at a design firm out of school, he struggled to establish his art practice, until he realized he could drop his pretensions about art making and just begin to make what he wanted to make.

At this time, beginning around 1999, McGinness began to use a vocabulary of simplified symbols that show off his masterful design sensibility and ability to pare down complex ideas to their iconographic essence. Over time, he has built up to a more baroque aesthetic, layering symbols and adapting a new lexicon of signs that takes their cue from crests and arabesque flourishes. His installations at Deitch, PS1 and Galerie du Jour in Paris combine wall paintings or vinyl cuts with paintings, sometimes intermingling commercial products as well. Although he has recently returned to using a more simplified forms, he has retained this strategy of exhibiting his work within complex, multi-layered installations.

McGinness' work is visually seductive, which is exactly what gives it immediate impact - simply put, it's really sexy work. He imbues his icononography with just enough content to pass muster in the art world, seamlessly intermingling semiotics with art historical references, pop culture and skate culture alike. What's troubling in his work is that he's so dependent on creating complex environments for his paintings and screenprints that function more as a high-end concept store than a gallery installation.

It's as if he wasn't quite able to purge his preconceptions about making art vs. graphic design, and still tries very hard to ensure that he finds justification for being included within the art world. Interesting, the result is that one is unintentionally reminded that the gallery houses commodity. Of course, gallery as store is nothing new - we've seen this at least since the 60s and 70s. But what's new is for the artist to completely embrace this model without any sort of critique. His 2003 Deitch installation, Worlds Within Worlds, began to break away from this, but he still seems caught between a desire to create more ephemeral work and a need to create marketable work.

When asked about the relationship between his screenprints or paintings and the environments he creates to house them, McGinness explained that the environments are destroyed while the prints and paintings are sold. Do these environments act as anything more than just a slick marketing backdrop that aid the consumer/collector in fetishizing the work? Chiho Aoshima, one of the many talents fostered in the house of Murakami, is also firmly embedded within a graphic design tradition, but I would argue that her installations more successfully act as installations, probably because she treats the gallery as white box instead of a temporary showcase for commodity.

This is a question that will continue to define the presence of graphic design in a contemporary art context. But for the immediate future, despite all of this, I must admit I still find myself under the spell of McGinness' visual seduction.

McGinness is concurrently showing 3 solo installations at Deitch Projects and Danziger Projects in New York, and PUBLICO in Cincinnati. His exhibition at Deitch Projects is accompanied by a new publication of the same name, installationview. If you weren't one of the lucky few to pick up your advance copy at the lecture, you can find them at Powells beginning November 1.

Posted by Katherine Bovee on October 31, 2005 at 9:08 | Comments (2)


I agree that I find his distinction between his design practice and his art practice untenable. As far as I could tell his only distinction was that design is a service industry (for another), whereas his art is purely self-indulgent (or to service his own needs). Mostly I was amused by his anecdote where he denied MTV access to his Deitch space, fearing that his installation was going to be co-opted to boost MTV's street-cred/hip factor - excatly how does this differ from giving a talk in the W + K atrium surrounded by nike and adidas designers? I attended the talk hoping it would redeem my opinion of his work (I've seen several installations in person), but now more than ever it seems to function merely as design-porn.

Posted by: thereal [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 31, 2005 11:26 PM

I disagree with your call Thereal. How does not letting MTV co-opt his art compare with his talk? Well, his talk was put on by PICA, not W+K, in fact, I don't think there was any billing about W+K in the material on the talk at all... and of course the audience of a guy who works in the space between art and design is going to be heavily attended by design focused people... So the difference is that two are totally unrelated.

I don't know that the argument of "what is art" has ever really been a very constructive conversation. More insightful would be to simply accept that it is art and then argue over the art itself.

I think his work speaks a lot to a younger generation that is very aware of design elements. (maybe over-aware?) We're bombarded with design to the extent that certain fonts and even ascii characters carry a lot of meaning. Especially the web-savvy! We are hyper-tuned to design, and online the design of things replaces seeing that thing in person. I interact with a lot of people I will probably never meet and when I imagine them I think of them as the colors of their blog or the image of their chat avatar.

Obviously as one of these web-focused people who really enjoyed the work (but found his presentation a bit dry) I felt like I got a lot out of it, and I'm glad to see a "designer" establishing himself in the world of art.

Posted by: kmikeym [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2005 08:52 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee