Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

City survey left out the Arts, add them back!
Late May Institutional Links
Early May links
Ending April Institutional Links
Weekend Picks
Thoughts on Tuski leaving PNCA
Mid April Links
America's Whispered Truths closing at Archer Gallery
Early April Critique of Institution Links
Spring Cleaning Cluster Reviews
Spring Calls

recent comments



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Thursday 09.22.05

« Required Reading | Main | Raad at Reed »

Jen Rybolt on Meow Meow at TBA


From the moment she fluttered onto the stage-dressing gown clutched around her, her short dark flyaway bob bracketing crimson lips-- Meow Meow held us captivated. Was it her childlike giddiness? Her manic starlet hysteria? Her worldly, womanly curves? Or that in her query, "What is Love," she seemed to be asking another question entirely?

In all the sensation that we were watching a treatise on Love in the form of a burlesque, Meow Meow managed to instill her entire presentation with a sense of foreboding and desperation. "Ne me quitte pas," she entreats, demands, wails throughout the set. "Do not leave me." Even so, we the viewers are often left, hanging between words and the sound of her breathing in silences that stretch into discomfort.


The first encounter the audience had with Meow Meow made us wonder if the show had actually started. M.M. wandered onto the stage in said dressing gown, and apologized for being delayed, for having to talk to her mother, and for having to indulge her mother by dancing. Her entire demeanor was that of a grade-schooler trapped in a woman's body, especially as she began dancing along with what looked like footage of a decades-past performance of Swan Lake. Her eyes were always to the screen, as if for cues, in an appropriate dress-had it been zipped up all the way. Left hanging loose in the bust as it was, she looked even more like the small girl playing an important game of dress-up, someone trying to fill the shoes of forgotten dancers.
The almost-theme of the woman-child continued through the set. M.M.'s character (how close she is to this character in reality I do not know) is of the cast of tempestuous starlet, needy and demanding and jealous, and still somehow sympathetic to the viewer. We gathered that she had been in Love, and that (presumably with the phone call she received on a bright red old-school telephone that made her scream in bloody horror) she had lost that Love. This girl-woman (a little Dietrich, a little Garbo, a little Crawford) proceeded to put us through a series of 15 "scientific" questions "experts" had come up with as ways we can tell if we are in Love. She would read them to the audience, quickening in pace and pitch as she moved from one question to the next, until you couldn't understand what she was saying for the spleen involved.

Abruptly, she would leave off talking about Love to demand her Stuff, and to testify to her Love of her Stuff. Indeed, M.M. wandered off stage (as she was prone to do throughout the set) and came back with a weighty golden chain linked around her ankle-she moved to the center off the stage, sat on the ground in her slinky gold lame dress (there were costume changes throughout) and started to haul the chain in, dragging steamer trunk-loads of Stuff on-stage after her. The chain seemed cumbersome but she didn't mind because it was attached to her Stuff. This was just one of the many metaphors that seemed to be drawn around the question What is Love?

At another point, Meow Meow seemed determined to make the audience (or at least representatives of the audience) Fall in Love with her in 30 Seconds. She gave them lollipops, made them suck on them in time to an old burlesque standard, and then did a strip tease (both on and off their laps) involving 7 pairs of underwear and 3 brassieres. She seemed disappointed with the results.

I left feeling that I had watched something that wasn't about Love so much as about the gap that Love sometimes leaves, and how we don't really know what Love is even if we're swimming in it. Is Love corporeal, that we experience with the flesh? Is it spiritual, only existing in our mind's eye? Does the subject of our Love rank as highly in our esteem as the sensation of Love itself? What is it about Love that makes us content to sit in the shadow of our Desired's dog, if we cannot bathe in the light of our Desired themself? Taking a closer look at the spectacle I'd just witnessed (which was capped by Meow Meow removing her short dark bob to reveal long blonde hair), I almost think that the periods of silence and waiting in the piece were more instructive than anything else- we were left alone to wonder at her intent, as she had been left alone to wait and wonder after receiving the mysterious phone call.

My Mouth is a Wonder (a marvel of what?)

My Mouth is a Whore (who does it satisfy?)

My Mouth is an open Wound (what seeps from the rawness?)

Jen Rybolt is a PNCA student and guest contributor to PORT.

Posted by Guest on September 22, 2005 at 1:26 | Comments (0)


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee