Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Resist: Inauguration at Una Gallery
Early February links
First Thursday Picks February 2017
Dead tree media & dead horse flogging news
Post Snowpocalypse Weekend Picks
More Disjecta'd
New Year opportunities
Monday Integrity Links
First Thursday Picks January 2017
Jason Berlin + Alanna Risse at Rainmaker
Saying goodby to 2016
Mid December Links

recent comments

Garric Simonsen

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Thursday 07.21.11

« Boundary Crossings | Main | Surveying Northwest Regional Surveys Part II »

Forest for the Tree Farm (Part I)

craggy_tree2_sm.jpg



PAM hosted a panel discussion July 17th with the title "Northwest Awards & Biennials." The short blurb on PAM's website read: Bonnie Laing-Malcolmson moderates a lively discussion about Northwest art and how best to recognize the art and artists of the region. This followed a series of Tweets I had a couple weeks prior with @pamcollections about this topic after that person wrote, What does "Northwest Art" mean to you? I'm really interested to hear what you guys think. With no real discussion ensuing (just an agreement that a discussion was needed) that addressed my concerns about the concept of "Northwest Art," I certainly wanted to attend the panel discussion, as it seemed to promise some insight into criteria. However, I must say that in the end, I was pleased when the subject was all but avoided - maybe even deemed wise to forego such a determination - for the hour-plus long presentation, instead focusing more on the mechanics of mounting exhibits such as the Contemporary Northwest Artists Awards now on display at PAM, or the Tacoma Art Museum's Northwest Biennial. (Rock Hushka, Tacoma Art Museum's Curator of Contemporary and Northwest Art, was a panel member.)

Although the CNAA is not a biennial, per se, it is a regional event that happens every other year, and draws on art from Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. (Tacoma Art Museum’s Biennial excludes Wyoming.) I mention this partly because I would find it slightly humorous if there were actually two different biennials for a given region. However, the fact that there are two very similar events that culminate with entirely different artists who make the cut begins to address some level of impracticality in suggesting that there may be a way to "recognize the art and artists of the region," for curatorial perspectives obviously vary, as must the mechanics behind the selection process.

The key is the cull. Hushka referred to it as a connoiseurship, twice. A very small number of people decide who are noteworthy artists within the region, and within that decision making process, there might be an attempt to elucidate what one determines to be an idiosyncratic nature shared by those artists. It is wholly a curatorial process, and therefore necessarily exclusionary as to other factors that might be considered. For instance, landscape painters might be entirely disregarded when markers for a different theme are posited. The same applies to any call for a Northwest aesthetic: it is necessarily a subjective call, and to insist on mailing down such a notion may end up somewhat reductive or even positivistic.

Pursuant to questions in the last portion of the discussion, Bonnie asserted that, in fact, Oregon artists are different than artists in other states in the region. One may assume that Washington artists are likewise different from artists in Montana or Idaho. This in itself speaks to the likelihood that there is not an overarching theme to Northwestern art. Yet, she went on to say that the artists do want to know what artists in neighboring states are doing. The third panel member, Beth Sellers from Suyama Space, seemed to echo this sentiment by suggesting that the multiple state format of these exhibitions opens up a dialogue among the artists in order for them to compare and contrast what is going on in the different states. If, then, there is a regionalized, predominating influence that develops from this curiosity and consequent dialogue, it might very well be the same type of influence that an a'tist derives from an art magazine or by perusing other artists' websites from any and everywhere. Trends do happen.

Yet, there is an 800-pound guerilla that must be addressed: Northwest artists are surrounded by Nature's 'majesty'. We gaze upon it, relatively speechless and barely aware that our presence has a contingency. (Nature in and of itself eludes meaning yet inspires, and this, I might suggest, is also why we find so much abstract art in the Northwest, but I will eave this for discussion at a later time). It presents a context regardless of whether we choose to embrace or displace its influence; and we recognize it in everything from landscape paintings and photographs to the construction at Terwilliger Curve or the long line of earth-moving equipment just north of Wilsonville on I-5.

CNAA3_sm.jpg
2011 CNAA's


Three of the artists in the CNAA exhibit directly engage the landscape in painting, photography and sculpture. Regardless of the media and materiality, it all fits nicely within a well-established tradition, a canon, if you will, and is, albeit contemporaneous, anything but contemporary. As for the rest of the selected artists, no doubt some of the work in the CNAA exhibit may be 'new' to the museum and may be barely within the threshold of acceptability for the wider audience wandering up from the Car exhibit, but all of it has its precursors elsewhere, some dating back hundreds of years. (Historical surveys may be where a curator might have better luck determining a regional aesthetic.) And I rush to say that while there is absolutely nothing wrong with this kind of exhibit, and that all of the artists are accomplished, please don't call it 'contemporary'. Call it a ‘celebration of excellence' or something along those lines,

Finally, this might be why there was an initial promise to suss out a Northwestern, regional, aesthetic: to make more of something than what it is. Like nationalism, there is a desire for a sense of pride we share for our region, and a concomitant need to insist that there is something special about this group with whom we identify. We feel safe, chosen, even if in our hearts we know it is illusory. It is also variously known as boosterism, and it sells. No doubt all three panelists are acutely aware of this and that is perhaps the reason the panel discussion felt more like an apologia for what was marketed as one thing yet ended up largely being about something else.


This is Part I, Part II is a survey of Northwest surveys


Posted by Patrick Collier on July 21, 2011 at 12:32 | Comments (1)


Comments

Would like to respond more in depth and less in fragment. But, time.... that excuse.

I speak from the perspective of a regional artist with a family history in the NW dating back 4 generations; many of us were and still are artists, mountaineers, ecologists, conservationists and political activists.

In my opinion you see more derivative works in areas of greater competition. To see any signs of an over-arching NW theme, you must give a fair look into some of the more remote areas and smaller metropolises.

The point made in this section; "Historical surveys may be where a curator might have better luck determining a regional aesthetic," is spot on. There's a great history surrounding relationships between NW artists. I've had conversations w/ veteran NW artists and curators who talk of days when they'd travel to Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana routinely in support of colleagues and to establish relationships with new talent.

Imagine that…

The NW is unique, we even have our own primate. Not to mention one of the most complex native art styles in the world. We're also more than capable of producing stand-out, big name artists of all kinds and genres. Our visual and performing artists portfolio is fucking stunning.

Most interesting is the mention of the "800-pound guerilla." Artists I know who have long histories here, embrace the closeness they feel with nature through their work. It's an idea that (through my own experiences) is hard for people to talk honestly about. Why? Maybe because for some discussing nature parallels with discussing god, or spirituality. There are serious faux pas' surrounding the idea of god or spirituality in art. It's taboo! You start inserting your spiritual beliefs in an artist statement and immediately you loose, about everyone.

Regardless, nature is the NW. We're steeped in it historically, metaphorically, socially, culturally and politically. Why not artistically? Look [there] and you'll find the answers to all the ambiguities. I've watched my work develop through many stages and there is always some formal lesson I've learned from being aware of my natural surroundings.

It's great to have writers this dedicated to an area. A blog like this in NY would have 20+ comments. Thanks for your hard work and sincerity…

Posted by: Garric Simonsen [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 26, 2011 01:19 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee