Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Giving Thanks Readings
Meet RACC's new leader Madison Cario
November Reviews
Early November Links
Spooky reviews
Countdown to Portlandageddon?
Mid October Links including PNCA/OCAC merger talks
Paul Allen, philanthropist and arts champion dead at 65
Midwest Art Initiative Tour
Haunting October Picks
End of September News
September review cluster

recent comments

james curran



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Friday 02.25.11

« installation, animation | Main | RAW 2011: Geographies »

Jay Steensma at Pulliam Gallery

Jay Steensma - JS465 Untitled Bird

There are degrees of "have-to" when it comes to making art, perhaps regulated by a self-consciousness that all artists have in various manifestations. It is somewhere on this continuum that distinctions are made regarding who is the outsider, the hack, the naif, the fine artist, or the Sunday painter. All are false as generalities, as a sum total of mitigating factors are often compromised in order to categorize.

Even so, what criteria must be met to call someone an outsider artist? Is the status retroactive, meaning should one have any formal art training at all, can the given circumstances of one’s life nullify that training and accumulated knowledge of art history? Does a pattern of socially alienating behavior achieve the same effect? How does one market a long-deceased, University of Washington trained devotee of the Northwest School who was also bipolar? With muted colors and sparse composition, or a lack of pretense with a corresponding economy, in a way, Steensma embodies the spirit of the region and his time; nor can I imagine a more rugged individualism than that found in mental illness.

But this latter sentiment is borne out of romanticism, similar to the notion that madness is in someway divine. Never mind the pain and isolation it engenders. That is not to say the mad artists — geniuses or otherwise — are not out there, as artist Jean Dubuffet's Musée de l'Art Brut in Lausanne, Switzerland indicates. According to Dubuffet, the extreme alienation of mental illness is the domain of the pure artist, and the culture-at-large are the swine who wouldn’t recognize the pearl if it hit them in the face. The discomfort goes unrecognizable for the sedate cultural consumer who readily nullifies the imbalance of any extreme passions imposed upon them by focusing on the lines and colors and, ultimately, a consensus. On the other hand, to think there is a greater percentage of undiscovered mad masters than artists who shop for groceries at WinCo may be wishful thinking; yet, both types might be just as alienated from the Inner Circle. What is rare, despite the mythos surrounding the genius of insanity is someone who thusly disabled and still manages to pursue a constructive outlet as well as be given the time of day. More often than not, it takes a village for recognition.

Bird of Prey (Wartime) , 1991 Housepaint on Paper Bag

I knew nothing of Steensma or his work when I saw his "Bird of Prey (Wartime)" at Pulliam a couple months ago. Yes, it has the tropes of crude media that one is accustomed to seeing in a lot of outsider work; yet there is a dynamic quality to his mark-making that to my mind put the work on par with a legion of action painters from the second half of the last century. Still, a body of work may not be as inspiring as one particular piece, yet that one outstanding is what may pull the viewer to more carefully consider the larger body of work.

There are three general observations that can be made from Steensma's paintings at Pulliam: The bird and fish paintings portray the animals on the same aspect, head to the left; the cottage paintings depict the same building, squat with one window and a door; in general, Steensma appears to favor a limited subject matter. We are thereby forced to consider content, which seems just as important to Steensma, if not more so, than the act of painting.

It may not be out of line to suggest that Steensma is working with and through some totemic issues, the repetition making the strongest case for such speculation. A reason beyond an affinity for birds and fish, the repetition of these particular motifs eludes me, The houses are another matter. Wesley Wehr, in his memoir, "The Accidental Collector: Art, Fossils and Friendships" (2004, University of Washington Press), writes that Steensma returned to Seattle after a stay in Belmont, Washington. It is also known that Steensma was born in Idaho. One of his house pieces in the current exhibit is titled "Idaho," and Pulliam's website shows two more house pieces entitled, "Belmont" (1994) and another, "Belmont Relic" (1991). Steensma seems to be painting stand-ins for memories.

Belmont Relic , 1991, Housepaint on Paper Bag

Make that four observations, or rather, another aspect of the same repetitive nature: the use of the word "relic". Awash in memories, perhaps fond of simpler, purer times, "relic" not only refers to something old, but also the remains of saints. Much of Steensma’s work that is not represented in the Pulliam exhibit is of religious reliquary, which brings me to observation number five: the letters/word "ECO" in many of his paintings. Given the time period, primarily between 1990 and 1994, it is doubtful that they have the same meaning as they carry today, namely, being short for 'ecology.' Given the religious subject matter that enters into the work, it may be more likely these letters represent 'ecce' or a shortened 'ecce homo', the suffering Christ crowned with thorns. To Steensma's credit, the desire to make these types of inferences draws one closer to his work, and perhaps his world.

JS99 Bird - graphite, charcoal, archival paper

Ultimately, one gets the feeling that Steensma, known for knocking out these works by the thousands, while working on one piece, is already anticipating the next. The work is not so much considered as driven. Either that, or with a new-found audience for his work, production was incumbent, even affording a shift from working on paper bags to stretched canvas and Arches paper. (The inventory of Wehr's papers at the University of Washington library lists over 200 of Steensma works in the collection, 95% of them from 1990 and later.)

It is hard to determine which is the most prominent aspect of Steensma's career: the return of an artist after a long and debilitating fight with mental illness, the sheer volume of the work he made in the final ten years of his life; or, the establishment of a market for the work. After all, the repetitious nature of Steensma's work might not play so well if he were an artist not known to suffer with a psychosis. In his context, Steensma's totems function as sort of a purifying mantra, a meditation to empty an obsession. Most likely, it is a combination of these factors that provide a human-interest story that captures our imaginations more than the nearly obsessive repetitious nature of his work. This is not to say that Steensma art lacks merit. As rough-hewn as it may be, the dynamic quality of much of the work parallels the obvious enthusiasm with which it is made. These factors are what have made Steensma a deserved staple of several Northwest galleries; yet, the familiarity that comes with the multiple venues may give audiences an assurance that the work is collectible while at the same time distancing them from this artist's plight.

Through February 26th at Pulliam Gallery

Posted by Patrick Collier on February 25, 2011 at 1:59 | Comments (1)


Well, Patrick, you bring up many new thoughts for me. At any rate, I like the Steensma samples.

Posted by: james curran [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 24, 2011 10:19 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee