Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Giving Thanks Readings
Meet RACC's new leader Madison Cario
November Reviews
Early November Links
Spooky reviews
Countdown to Portlandageddon?
Mid October Links including PNCA/OCAC merger talks
Paul Allen, philanthropist and arts champion dead at 65
Midwest Art Initiative Tour
Haunting October Picks
End of September News
September review cluster

recent comments



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Sunday 08.01.10

« Tabor Robak's Quarterback at Appendix | Main | Monday Cinema »

Sol LeWitt Wall Drawing at PAM

The wall drawings of Sol LeWitt, though dated by more than a decade, still resonate with the current artistic community. Sol LeWitt was a courageous artist with powerful insights as to both the workings and processes of art. He questioned drawing, painting, and sculpture unabashedly and directly with explorations of simple geometric form, color, and line. He also had the foresight to create work that would continue to spawn beyond his own lifespan, leaving us with gifts like Wall Drawing #304 currently on view at the Portland Art Museum.

Sol LeWitt Wall Drawing #304

The construction of LeWitt's drawing in the Schnizter Sculpture Court was completed by Nobuto Suga and Aaron Doyle. For six days they worked on massive scaffolding carefully following LeWitt's directions and diagram. Every measurement and line required careful communication between both artists, as well as constant attention to LeWitt's instructions. The artists' process represented a union, which I found had a great deal in common with the subjects of LeWitt's work. Their cooperation spoke metaphorically to the interlocking shapes patterned on the wall behind them.

Aaron Doyle on the scaffolding

LeWitt's work eloquently questiones the boundaries of art by separating the artist's hand from the product while maintaining indirect control of the marks. LeWitt disengaged personal history from his subject matter and mark during a time of heightened expressionism. LeWitt utilized a systemic pseudo-scientific approach to making art, relying on mathematical patterns and logic instead of politics or personal evaluations. The idea of removing emotional and environmental influences from the work would become vital components of both Conceptualism and Minimalism.

The beauty of LeWitt's art, aside from its aesthetically pleasing form, resides in its commanding simplicity. In fact one need look no further than the title "all combinations circles, squares, triangles, rectangles, trapezoids, parallelograms superimposed in pairs" to know what the work is about. Verifying that all combinations are indeed present is task easily accomplished by most any viewer. Yet one still feels gratified from the satisfaction of double-checking LeWitt's math. Such accessible subject matter is inclusive to even the most inexperienced museumgoer, an admirable trait in any artist.


Though simple in its form, LeWitt's work is indeed layered with implications about authorship, originality, and our definitions of painting. His wall drawings in particular expose relationships between the physical manifestation of an object and its conception, as well as the rigid nature of a paintings' support.

LeWitt's directions for wall drawings complicate the viewer's location of the art itself. Is the art in the wall drawing or the detailed instructions LeWitt created some forty years ago? Does the diagram become art once it has been made tangible or is the concept of the work a piece of art in of itself? LeWitt's inquiries approach fundamental structures of drawing, from conception to realization, and force his audience to reevaluate the boundaries of art.

A painting's inherent flatness concerned LeWitt, which may have led to the evolution of his wall drawings. He saw awkwardness in the separation between the canvas and the wall, opting instead to have the painting directly placed on its environment. By doing so LeWitt manifests an idea without building an object/artifact. Instead, the painting becomes part of the architecture of its environment, lacking both the mobility and lifespan of a panel or stretched canvas.

Aaron Doyle and Nobuto Suga

Because LeWitt's wall drawings may be created ad infinitum one cannot help but wonder where the original and the copy exist. If the drawing has already been painted on a wall is the next iteration simply a copy? What happens when two versions of the same wall drawing exist? Perhaps all iterations are copies of the schematic LeWitt designed, yet most viewers probably would not consider the small piece of printer paper covered with dimensions and directions to represent the work itself. LeWitt believed that the wall drawing was required to realize the idea, which implies that the original must exist in the drawing itself, as the conceptualization has only the potential to become a fully functioning work. It may not be far off to suggest that each time the wall drawing is resurrected an original copy exists.

In discussion with fellow PORT star Arcy Dougless about production, reproduction, and lifespan of LeWitt's drawings, Dougless noted that one of the key aspects of LeWitt's wall drawings accurately manifesting was the amount of tolerance in mark he allowed its producers. Because LeWitt used the hands of others to realize his ideas, he was forced to decide what kind of tolerances he would allow. There was a period early in his career where he was admittedly over-optimistic about who could execute his ideas, and he was ultimately forced to reserve the production of his concepts to qualified draftsmen. Currently, the Sol LeWitt Foundation oversees the production of wall drawings, employing a team of artists who have received specific training in their execution.

Nobuto Suga wiping white crayon off his straight edge

What Dougless was unearthing is the idea of permanence. Let us take the example of a copy machine. Instead of using a master copy to duplicate our work, we use each successive copy to make the next. Over time information will be lost due to imperfections in scanning and printing. Interestingly, LeWitt's wall drawings attempt to break this seemingly natural phenomenon of information degradation by embracing the forces that decay the original. LeWitt understood that people would always have slightly different inclinations as to how they make marks. His solution was to create a culture surrounding the production of his drawings infusing core thought processes that could be passed down through generations. Nobuto Suga is living evidence that the culture has been preserved, having learned his techniques from an artist who worked directly with Sol LeWitt.

Sol LeWitt's diagram for Wall Drawing #304

The ephemeral nature of the wall drawings' existence eschews a plethora of questions about authorship and ownership. Most would agree that Wall Drawing #304, even after having been completely drawn by Nobuto and Aaron, is still a Sol LeWitt. Yet LeWitt will never see Wall Drawing #304 as it is presented at the Portland Art Museum, and never knew of its existence in the first place. Truly this work could not be made without an entire team of people carrying LeWitt's legacy making each member as integral as LeWitt himself in the realization of the this particular work.

Much in the vein of Duchamp's fabrications, LeWitt not only relied on others fashioning his ideas, he created work that was empowered by its delegation. He used a system that was straightforward and honest yet devoid of personal biases. His wall drawings foretold the integration of architecture, design, and art, while his conceptual applications begat an entire movement. What I will cherish most about LeWitt though, is his inherent inclusiveness. His ability to welcome people, be it through accessible subject matter or the physical production of his ideas, unifies the art world and the general public, two communities that are all too often separated by a lack of faith in each other.

Posted by Jascha Owens on August 01, 2010 at 15:40 | Comments (0)


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee