Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Giving Thanks Readings
Meet RACC's new leader Madison Cario
November Reviews
Early November Links
Spooky reviews
Countdown to Portlandageddon?
Mid October Links including PNCA/OCAC merger talks
Paul Allen, philanthropist and arts champion dead at 65
Midwest Art Initiative Tour
Haunting October Picks
End of September News
September review cluster

recent comments



Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Openings & Events
About PORT

regular contributors


Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman



Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us


Contact us






powered by


Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a


Creative Commons License

Friday 06.13.08

« Shiro Nakane Lectures | Main | The first Contemporary Northwest Art Awards »

Brighter Than a Thousand Suns

Robert Beckmann
Test House - First Light, 2008
Oil on Canvas
36 x 48 inches
(c) Robert Beckmann 2008

"I have become death, the destroyer of worlds," J. Robert Oppenheimer spontaneously said upon witnessing the first detonation of a nuclear bomb on July 16, 1945. The statement is a slight mistranslation of a passage from the classic Hindu text the Bhagavad-Gita. It is hard to imagine that Oppenheimer's declaration is even an overstatement. The bomb has one purpose: to destroy. But even something as seemingly straight forward as the atomic bomb never remains clear for very long. We can't help but to begin to question ourselves: What does the bomb mean? Why do we feel compelled to build them? Is it protection for ourselves or from ourselves? In a surprisingly direct way, we are confronted with these questions and more when we are looking at Ashland artist's Robert Beckmann's new paintings of the Nevada Test Site that are part of a group show at Jim Kempner Fine Art in New York this month.

A photo from Operation Gable, an explosion similar to Operation Cue, that took
place in November 1951

When you think of nuclear weapons it is hard not to think of the strange vocabulary that was developed in the 1950's to describe it like massive retaliation, collateral damage and mutually assured destruction. The premise is that nuclear weapons keep Americans safe because the result of using even one bomb is so devastating and catastrophic that neither side in a conflict would want to risk a full scale exchange. The result is that conflicts and wars can be framed by these parameters that guide behavior. It was our way of trying to create stability in an unstable world. The bomb becomes a way of ensuring our safety at any cost. A failure to follow the guidelines would result in total annihilation of the whole planet. The result, in theory, is that it would be too risky for a country like the Soviet Union to invade the continental U.S. because of a fear of a nuclear retaliation. They would inevitably be destroyed along with ourselves. This formed the basis of Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.)doctrine. Of course, the retaliation only works if there is a country to strike back against and it is considerably less effective in retaliating against a group of multinational individuals. The result is that by trying to go to illogical lengths to ensure our safety, we become not only extremely vulnerable but the world becomes incredibly dangerous.

Houses were placed at different distances from the blast so that scientists would be
able to study how standard construction methods would withstand the shockwave

These ideas become even more complex when you consider the tests that were performed at the Nevada Test Site in the 1950's and 1960's. Some of these tests were to determine how the United States would survive a nuclear attack. This is where things get a little strange for me. The U.S. does not want to use nuclear weapons because that would result in the destruction of the entire planet but just in case we should test our weapons against our infrastructure: houses, schools and factories to determine their survivability in case of a nuclear exchange. Now the houses and schools were inhabited only by mannequins, a subject also explored by Robert in a different series of paintings. We inevitably become what we fear. The whole program has a circular logic to it: we want to remain safe at all costs even if it means destroying ourselves. Why is it easier to destroy yourself than your idea of safety? If you are willing to accept the possibility of your destruction in the first place, you should realize that you do not need the feeling of safety provided by nuclear weapons simply because they do not make the world a safer place but only considerably more dangerous. The great contradiction is that by insisting on your personal safety (or the safety of your country) at all costs, you make the world more dangerous for everyone including yourself.

Robert Beckmann
Test House - Fire, 2008
Oil on Canvas
18 x 24 inches
(c) Robert Beckmann 2008

In Test House, we never get to see the actual nuclear blast in these paintings. It is always waiting just outside of the frame. We only get to experience the effect, the deliberately devastating result of any nuclear blast. The blast itself bathes the house in an other worldly light for a few microseconds before it dissolves. In Test House, time slows down, a microsecond becomes an eternity and the paintings generate an unexpected gravitas. When everything slows down, we are allowed to examine the experience holistically. We see that the whole struggle is motivated by the most basic human need of protecting ourselves and our family and the result was a weapon that would destroy life as we know it, for everyone. The recognition of our desire for dominance and stability in an unstable world and the fear that someone else would use the weapon before we could. As time slows down, we can look at the experience from all sides. We are allowed to learn as much about ourselves as about what the test site means about our country. The longer that I stood in front of Robert's paintings the more I was bothered about whether the event that represented the worst part of our secular selves, was not in some deeper way profoundly sacred.

Joseph Campbell thought that all battlefields were offerings to the great Hindu goddess Kali. Kali is the goddess of time and time is the great destroyer. Time inevitably levels governments as well as mountains. You could say that time is the manifestation of everything that is impermanent and fleeting whether something survives for five minutes or 5000 years it must all end sooner or later, it is the nature of our existence. Time is inevitable. Change is inevitable. As human beings, we naturally want to avoid suffering. We crave the permanent and the eternal especially to prevent more suffering or loss. We are even willing to fight wars to ensure that we do not suffer. Whether wars are fought out of anger or safety of family and home, both experience are equally impermanent because there will inevitably be another conflict. Campbell felt that the battlefield was an altar to the goddess Kali because it was the vivid demonstration of everything that makes us human. It is the embodiment of our struggle against the transient nature of our existence. Even the light from the battlefields of a nuclear exchange evolves from a secular to a sacred light. The light is radiant proof of our humanity, our flaws and our folly.

Close up of the mushroom cloud from Operation Grable, November 1951.
Joseph Campbell thought that the mushroom is the embodiment of the
Hindu Goddess Kali, the goddess of change and death

In the mid 1950's at the Nevada Test Site, it was common for houses to be built at different distances from a nuclear blast to study the survivability of different types of housing. As part of Operation Cue in May 5, 1955, houses at differences were filmed being exposed to a nuclear explosion to see the potential effects on any occupants. Basically, they wanted to find out how far you have to be from a nuclear blast for the infrastructure of a city to survive. The houses and schools were called euphemistically "Survivor's Town" by the test program but "Doomstown" by the workers. We have all seen the famous images of the house being obliterated by the shock wave of a nuclear blast. The images echo in our collective consciousness and belong to all of us. It describes some essential quality of what it means to be an American. Here is the clip on Youtube:

It is hard to deny the symbolic significance of destroying houses. Everything gets twisted around, we are destroying exactly what we wanted to protect: our family, our home, ourselves and our way of life. The reason that I am writing about Robert's painting is that even though the images belong to all of us, the vision is his. His paintings are a meditation on the impermanent, transient nature of our existence. Ultimately the paintings are much more than images of the Test House, they become about the way that we experience our existence, about what it means to be human. Rather than leaves flowing down a gentle country stream, we are confronted with the blast of the radioactive shockwave but the result is the same. We can hear the gentle Hindu mantra: everything is impermanent; everything is without self. The transient nature of our existence is revealed in still images from 14 seconds of film footage that are framed forever in these paintings.

One of the houses from Operation Cue that was located 7500 feet from the blast
as it stands today

If we began the text quoting Hindu scripture, maybe the best way to end is with certain symmetry by quoting a different text:

Asato Ma Sat Gamaya
Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya
Mrityor Ma Amritam Gamaya
Om Shanti Shanti Shanti.

(Lead Us From the Unreal To Real,
Lead Us From Darkness To Light,
Lead Us From Death To Immortality,
Let There Be Peace Peace Peace)

- Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.3.28.

Robert Beckmann
Test House - Concussion, 2008
Oil on Canvas
18 x 24 inches
(c) Robert Beckmann 2008

Posted by Arcy Douglass on June 13, 2008 at 10:07 | Comments (0)


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?

s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee